Najib Razak (image – Wikipedia)
Najib Razak (image - Wikipedia)
Najib Razak (image – Wikipedia)

The evolving scandal involving Malaysia’s Prime Minister Najib Razak, who has been accused of pocketing money from 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), a strategic development company wholly owned by the Government of Malaysia, hit closer to home yesterday.

Some of the funds, the total which which allegedly amounted to US$700bil, has been said to be parked with a bank based in Singapore.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore on 8 July said that authorities were “in touch with their Malaysian counterparts” on investigations into 1MDB. “We are committed to assist within the full ambit of our laws. As there are ongoing investigations in Malaysia, it is not appropriate to provide more details.”

Even as a task force raided 1MDB’s office on 8 July to investigate the matter, Mr Najib has maintain that he was innocent and that the charges were trumped up by his political opponents to unseat a democratically-elected Prime Minister.

The controversy has been rumbling in the background in Malaysia, but the bells sounded when the Wall Street Journal launched an accusation indicating that it has documents to prove its allegation, and subsequently released flowcharts and bank documents to show transactions in March 2013, December 2014 and February 2015 that purportedly ended up in Najib’s accounts.

1MDB logo WikipediaMr Najib had denied the accusations. “Accusations by the Wall Street Journal are malicious and supported by certain quarters in the country with the purpose of forcing me to quit as prime minister and president of the United Malays National Organisation,” he had said.

Mr Najib to date has instructed his lawyers to consider action against WSJ over its report.

But not all were convinced by his stand. “If he had been defamed and you know you have been defamed, you instruct your lawyer to take action,” said Democratic Action Party National Advisor Lim Kit Siang. “You don’t ask your lawyer for advice, correct?”

Mr Naijb’s Cabinet has largely stood by him, with Ministers calling for restraint until clarity could be established.

“Right now the taskforce is investigating the matter,” Malaysian Youth and Sports Minister Khairy Jamalluddin was reported to have said. “Until the taskforce comes out with the result of investigations, it’s too premature to comment about anything else.”

“I think no one is above the laws of the country, but let the laws and investigations have its due process,” said Defence Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein. “Let’s not speculate and be divisive among ourselves, especially during this Ramadan month, and accuse someone who might be innocent.”

Mahathir Mohamad (image - Wikipedia)
Mahathir Mohamad (image – Wikipedia)

Members of Malaysia’s opposition parties were less supportive. Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, wife ofopposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, who had been jailed on sodomy charges, had urged Mr Najib to take the “gentlemanly” route by taking a leave of absence while investigations are carried out.

Pakatan Rakyat’s vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar had also indicated that the party will file a civil suit to nullify seats won by Barisan Nasional in the last general election, as the WSJ report indicated that funds from 1MDB were used for its BN’s general election campaign.

“The person who has shamed the country is Najib and his 1MDB. Before this, the country was never ridiculed like this, with such allegations that remain unanswered until now,” said former Malaysia Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, suggesting that Mr Najib should step down and criticising his Ministers for defending him.

Dow Jones & Co., which publishes WSJ, said that they “stand behind (their) fair and accurate coverage of this evolving story.”

Adapted from media reports.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

《海时》将情义之家影片加自家水印 惹争议急撤短片!

本地客工组织情义之家(HOME),在本月9日上载采访律师阿尼尔的影片。阿尼尔在近期备受关注的印尼籍前女佣巴蒂胜诉案件,担任巴蒂的辩护律师。阿尼尔在影片中阐述在本地工作缺乏保护,他们的声音已被忽略,也阐述巴蒂案件辩护过程面对的各种挑战。 情义之家是在法庭作出裁决前一周录制,并在判决后,于前日播出。不过,本地英语大报《海峡时报》,竟将有关短片稍作编辑,加上自家《海时》商标水印,就直接发布到该报的官方脸书专页! 事件引发不少读者不满,本地学者Stephii Chok就在脸书斥责,《海时》把情义之家的原影片进行编辑,而整体设计让读者看起来,会误以为是《海时》制作的。 她强调,影片始终是情义之家的知识产权,《海时》若要采用也应该事先征求情义之家的同意,又或者直接分享有关影片链接即可。 她也指出,巴蒂一案的审讯是在公开法庭,从国家法院的审讯开始至巴蒂被判刑,《海时》本可同时采访控辩双方说法, 包括巴蒂和辩护律师阿尼尔的说词,但在过去却只放大检控官的论述。 但如今为了追求点击率,《海时》却直接使用情义之家的影片,有剽窃之嫌,令她不敢恭维。 Dear The Straits Times,…

Attempt to smuggle 525 cartons and 250 packets of assorted duty-unpaid cigarettes foiled by ICA

525 cartons and 250 packets of assorted duty-unpaid cigarettes were discovered in…

CAD, MAS, ACRA launch joint investigation into Hyflux’s current and former directors for breach of disclosure and non-compliance accounting standards

The Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) of the Singapore Police Force, the Monetary…

HDB to upgrade 230,000 flats with more contemporary and better quality fittings

Residents whose Housing Development Board (HDB) flats are eligible for upgrading under…