Jeannette Chong Aruldoss (image – Archilex Law Corp)

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, at an Institute of Policy Studies dialogue held on 2 July 2015, was asked if he believed in instilling a ‘culture of respect’ through court proceedings impedes the building of a vibrant economy.

PM Lee replied:

“You want people who stand up, we don’t want people who scrape and bow. But if you don’t have a certain natural aristocracy in the system, people who are respected because they have earned that and we level everything down to the lowest common denominator, then I think society will lose out … If you end up with anarchy, it doesn’t mean that you’ll be delivered with brilliance.” (Emphasis added)

download (6)Jeannette Chong Aruldoss, a member from the Singapore People’s Party and candidate for Mountbatten SMC, rebutted Mr Lee’s arguments via a Facebook post yesterday.

Ms Chong argued that in this day and age, instead of focusing on aristocracy, we should focus more on “closing the gap” in order to take advantage of the new global economy.

While I respect PM Lee, I fundamentally disagree with him.

If one reads PM Lee’s quote in context, he is speaking of an aristocracy in the sense of a ruling elite based on ‘merit’, as opposed to the aristocracy of hereditary titles one would automatically associate with the House of Lords in the United Kingdom.

The danger of Singapore being led by a ‘meritocratic elite’ is equally dangerous, if not more dangerous than an aristocracy or Lords and Ladies because it perpetuates an insidious myth: that those at the highest rungs of society are there because they are somehow ‘better’ or more deserving – somehow more ‘meritorious’.

The virtue of meritocracy might have held some truth in the early founding years of our nation. However, after decades of economic progress, the second and third generation offspring of those better off have gathered in-built advantages that helped them get an early head start. (For a simple illustration of the myth of meritocracy, click on this link:http://thewireless.co.nz/articles/the-pencilsword-on-a-plate )

In a 2012 paper, a group of leading economists noted [1] that income inequality in Singapore was being exacerbated by declining social mobility. They highlighted the problem that the current level of social mobility “is no longer adequate to give young Singaporeans from lower income backgrounds a chance of moving up in life”.

While PM Lee is largely correct in saying that it’s unlikely we’ll find brilliance out of anarchy, it seems like he is making a straw man argument. Not supporting a ‘natural aristocracy’ does not necessarily lead to anarchy. PM Lee’s response falsely forces people to choose between one and the other.

Ultimately, the reality of the new global economy is the fact that retaining Singapore’s leading economic role in the region and position on the world stage will depend on our ability to broaden our leadership beyond a narrow elite and tap our strongest resource: each and every citizen of Singapore.

In order to do so we have to stop using terms like ‘aristocracy’ and instead focus on closing the widening gaps in society.

I’m very sure that we’ll be much better off by involving all Singaporeans in charting Singapore’s future together, whether you belong to the meritocratic aristocracy or not.

Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss

[1] Background paper for the Singapore Perspectives Seminar 2012 entitled “Inequality and the Need for a New Social Compact” co-authored by Manu Bhaskaran, Ho Seng Chee, Donald Low, Tan Kim Song, Sudhir Vadaketh and Yeoh Lam Keong
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

吴家和发起 周日办探讨CECA、人口课题集会

失业者互助网站 Transitioning.org创办人吴家和(Gilbert Goh),于来临的周日(11月3日)下午4时至7时,在芳林公园发起集会,欢迎关注移民课题、新印全面经济合作协定(CECA)的民众,踊跃出席。 根据吴家和在昨日发布的贴文,海报上写着“让新加坡再次伟大”,以及“对CECA、拉美斯(Ramesh)和690万人口说不”。 海报上的拉美斯应是指近期因为停车费和公寓保安起政治的印裔高管拉美斯。相信是不满到访友人被征收10元停车费,他回呛保安人员,“我花了150万元买下这个单位”。然而他与保安争执的视频瞬间在社交媒体传开,其态度亦引来许多民众非议。 拉美斯已在今日向有关保安人员道歉。 至于总理李显龙曾在2015年的一次访谈,所谓690万人口实则是制定基础设施的指标,即国内建造铁路、房屋等,有能力应付690万人口为依据。 吴家和在脸书呼吁道,不管是失业者、就业中或不满意现有体制,都欢迎出席,而如果是保安人员,无任欢迎,希望能听听他们的想法。 基于当天预计可能下雨,天气会转凉,现场也将准备热美禄让老人家暖暖身子。 在另一则贴文,吴家和表示目前有500位群众表示将出席或有兴趣出席。他补充也邀请了新加坡前进党秘书长、前总统候选人陈清木医生出席。 陈清木曾在今年8月3日的前进党推介礼致词,呼吁重新检讨新印全面经济合作协定。 “我们需要政府公布CECA的表单,证明究竟多少国人从该协议受益?有多少印度专才前来工作?” 陈清木也认为,政府不能只关注GDP成长,也要有适合经商环境和支持SME和本地企业。…

2018 is Singapore’s Eighth Warmest Year on Record

Singaporeans faced the eight warmest year on record in 2018 as the…

傅海燕为“反霸位运动”站台 惟被指过去曾“霸”红格车位

文化、社区及青年部长傅海燕日前出席日行一善理事会举办的“友善嘉年华”(Kindness Carnival)活动,活动期间也为“反霸位运动” (Anti-Chope Movement)宣传站台。 “反霸位运动”的创办人张瑞旂,上周四在脸书帖文表示,对于能邀请到部长为“反霸位”醒觉宣导站台感荣幸 ,并上载与部长的合照,标记#antichopemovement。 傅海燕作为活动的荣誉贵宾,对类似宣导活动表示赞赏,他认为是在提倡更多礼貌行为。他表示“希望友善文化不要仅限于活动中,更多的是将友善文化融入到社会当中,将新加坡朔造为包容和谐的环境。” 张瑞旂也提出“反霸位行动”的缘由,“一开始我对于”霸位“行为感到非常困扰,所以我决定展开宣导行动,希望能够由此而得到一些改善。” 他认为,霸位并非日常生活的一部分,而是一种贪小便宜的自私行为。而霸位出现在各个角落如摊贩中心、咖啡店、快餐店等地方。 有别于高级餐厅,这些地点让民众享有廉价美食,那么免费提供给顾客们的座位,就理应是先到先得,等待位置,而不是将各种东西放在座位上占据。 他呼吁,“请不要霸位,这是非常不礼貌的行为“。 傅海燕曾出现占停车位行为…

I don’t know how to vote, but do you?

This note was first published on the author’s Facebook page. He has…