Jeannette Chong Aruldoss (image – Archilex Law Corp)

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, at an Institute of Policy Studies dialogue held on 2 July 2015, was asked if he believed in instilling a ‘culture of respect’ through court proceedings impedes the building of a vibrant economy.

PM Lee replied:

“You want people who stand up, we don’t want people who scrape and bow. But if you don’t have a certain natural aristocracy in the system, people who are respected because they have earned that and we level everything down to the lowest common denominator, then I think society will lose out … If you end up with anarchy, it doesn’t mean that you’ll be delivered with brilliance.” (Emphasis added)

download (6)Jeannette Chong Aruldoss, a member from the Singapore People’s Party and candidate for Mountbatten SMC, rebutted Mr Lee’s arguments via a Facebook post yesterday.

Ms Chong argued that in this day and age, instead of focusing on aristocracy, we should focus more on “closing the gap” in order to take advantage of the new global economy.

While I respect PM Lee, I fundamentally disagree with him.

If one reads PM Lee’s quote in context, he is speaking of an aristocracy in the sense of a ruling elite based on ‘merit’, as opposed to the aristocracy of hereditary titles one would automatically associate with the House of Lords in the United Kingdom.

The danger of Singapore being led by a ‘meritocratic elite’ is equally dangerous, if not more dangerous than an aristocracy or Lords and Ladies because it perpetuates an insidious myth: that those at the highest rungs of society are there because they are somehow ‘better’ or more deserving – somehow more ‘meritorious’.

The virtue of meritocracy might have held some truth in the early founding years of our nation. However, after decades of economic progress, the second and third generation offspring of those better off have gathered in-built advantages that helped them get an early head start. (For a simple illustration of the myth of meritocracy, click on this link:http://thewireless.co.nz/articles/the-pencilsword-on-a-plate )

In a 2012 paper, a group of leading economists noted [1] that income inequality in Singapore was being exacerbated by declining social mobility. They highlighted the problem that the current level of social mobility “is no longer adequate to give young Singaporeans from lower income backgrounds a chance of moving up in life”.

While PM Lee is largely correct in saying that it’s unlikely we’ll find brilliance out of anarchy, it seems like he is making a straw man argument. Not supporting a ‘natural aristocracy’ does not necessarily lead to anarchy. PM Lee’s response falsely forces people to choose between one and the other.

Ultimately, the reality of the new global economy is the fact that retaining Singapore’s leading economic role in the region and position on the world stage will depend on our ability to broaden our leadership beyond a narrow elite and tap our strongest resource: each and every citizen of Singapore.

In order to do so we have to stop using terms like ‘aristocracy’ and instead focus on closing the widening gaps in society.

I’m very sure that we’ll be much better off by involving all Singaporeans in charting Singapore’s future together, whether you belong to the meritocratic aristocracy or not.

Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss

[1] Background paper for the Singapore Perspectives Seminar 2012 entitled “Inequality and the Need for a New Social Compact” co-authored by Manu Bhaskaran, Ho Seng Chee, Donald Low, Tan Kim Song, Sudhir Vadaketh and Yeoh Lam Keong
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

受不确定性因素影响 今年就职空缺料下滑

人力部今日(20日)指出,鉴于今年的不确定性前景,新加坡今年的就职机会预计将会进一步下滑。 人力部长杨莉明今天在发布该部门2019年就职机会报告后指出,报告显示就职机会数量减少是因为雇主更为谨慎地招聘情绪。 雇主谨慎态度致空缺减少 去年的就职机会只有5万2900个,比2018年的6万3300少了超过一万,但是各个领域,尤其是正在增长的领域,仍然有就业空缺。“主要的工作机会来自信息技术、医疗保健、业务发展以及销售领域。” 杨莉明在脸书上帖文指出,调查发现疫情以及全球经济放缓所影响,得到有关的结果并不令人意外。“2019年的就业机会整体而言较少,但是增长领域仍有很多就业机会。鉴于2020年的不确定性,我们预计就业机会会进一步下滑。” 人力部指出,2019年中有约42巴仙的就职机会,是基于业务形成和扩张而新设立的职位,情况与2018年相似。 增长性领域,包括信息与通信技术、专业服务、金融与保险服务业、批发贸易、以及医疗保健等领域的就职机会比例,比平均水准来得高。而软件、网络和多媒体技术开发人员和系统分析人员、商业和市场销售主管、业务开发经理、护士以及医疗保健助理的市场需求也不断增加。 雇主更看重应聘者经验态度 包括软件、网络和多媒体技术开发人员、商业及市场销售主管在内的PMET职业空缺中,将近一半的雇主更加注重技能、工作经验和态度,而不是学历。 人力部在今天的发布会上说,对于职业空缺,缺乏专业技能也是雇主拒绝聘请的普遍原因。 而非PMET空缺则主要是因为工资和预期不匹配所致。 当局,除了学历,雇主更加注重应聘者的技能、工作经验和态度。…

International human rights lawyer, M Ravi gets back his practising certificate after four years

In a Facebook post on Friday (5 July), international human rights lawyer…

Sylvia Lim’s second letter to residents, informs them of TC surplus

The following letter was published on the Workers’ Party website. SECOND OPEN…

选前布局? 民主党访陈清木“热情讨论未来计划”引猜测

上周五(10月4日),新加坡前进党秘书长陈清木医生、民主党主席淡马亚和秘书长徐顺全,不约而同在脸书分享合照,双方也直言有针对即将到来的选举进行讨论。 陈清木医生在脸书写道:“上月,我很高兴出席工人党举办的晚宴,而在这个月,也很高兴能和民主党同席。感谢民主党赠送该党的竞选纲领。我们对于未来也有热情的讨论。” 至于民主党秘书长徐顺全也在个人脸书分享,该党成员进行拜访居民活动,在荷兰-武吉知马选区也拜访了陈清木医生(后者也是该区选民),商谈有关选举的计划。 随着选举局在上月4日宣布,已召开成立了选区范围检讨委员会,各党在这个时间点前后紧锣密鼓地拜访群众、做好备战选举工作,已是不争的事实。例如前进党在8月3日甫举办党推介礼,即马不停蹄展开一系列活动,包括讲座以及上月29日的走访群众活动,一次就拜访了29个选区。 据了解,即便前进党拜访的选区中,也有民主党正耕耘中的选区,不过前进党在走访前都有礼貌知会,似乎各反对党间存有一定的默契。 一些支持者看好较具实力的反对党能组成联盟,在即将来临选举中抗衡执政党。事实上包括工人党、前进党、民主党等都已不是首次互相伸出橄榄枝展现友好示意,在《网络公民》举办的募款晚宴上,各党一同现身出席,也能看出一些端倪。 陈清木医生本人在未成立前进党之前,曾于去年7月受邀出席民主党午餐聚会,会上本土七个反对党聚首,当时坊间就在揣测陈清木会否当上“盟主”,成反对党统帅迎战李显龙为首的人民行动党。 至于工人党在一个月前举办的国庆晚宴,陈清木亦偕同该党党要一同捧场工人党活动。 故此,从近一年的事态发展来看,民主党拜访陈清木,双方甚至“热烈讨论”有关选举的计划,也就不太意外。至于他们不久后将推出怎样的备战大计,我们就不得而知了。 这段期间工人党也没闲着,除了照旧应付国会议事辩论外,在选区亦积极打好基本功做好服务工作,以及拜访选民,在工人党脸书专页最新的贴文,则显示工人党前党魁暨阿裕尼集选区议员刘程强,到市场和巴士转换站等地拜访居民: 另一方面由林鼎领导的人民之声党,也似乎正积极经营蔡厝港、丹绒巴葛、巴西立榜莪、惹兰勿刹等选区,林鼎本身也积极发表政论,逐步增加在选民间的印象。