Yee
Yee
Yee

In a letter to the Prime Minister on Saturday, a group of members of the public, which include parents and prominent members of the community, have expressed concerns over the “harsh treatment” of 16-year old video-blogger Amos Yee.

“We are writing to register our deep concern as citizens and as parents, teachers and other adults who work with children and young people, over the State’s prosecution of Amos Yee,” the letter, endorsed by 77 signatories, said.

“Besides the negative impact on his well-being and that of his family, the harsh treatment he has faced creates a negative environment for all younger members of our society.”

They also urged Mr Lee “to honour Singapore’s commitments under the Convention on the Rights of the Child to always act with the best interests of the child as a primary consideration in all actions undertaken by public institutions.”

“We are aware of the negative aspects of Amos’ communications,” the letter said. “Nonetheless, we are troubled by the State’s harsh reactions to them, including the prosecution’s request for reformative training lasting at least 18 months.”

The group said it hopes the letter “will be received in good faith – as a demonstration of our commitment to just and reasonable processes, and our shared concern with the State toward the safe-guarding and nurturing of our young.”

The letter is also copied to Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Home Affairs Teo Chee Hean, Education Minister Heng Swee Keat, and Attorney General VK Rajah.

The letter is the latest to join in the call for the release of the teenager or to express concerns about his treatment by the State. The United Nations, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have all called for the youth to be released immediately, and protests in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Malaysia have also taken place in support of the boy.

Singaporeans will also be taking to Hong Lim Park tomorrow (Sunday, 5 July) at 4pm to lend their voices to the call to free Amos Yee. (See here.)

The teenager would have been in remand for a total of 55 days by the time of his next appearance in court on 6 July. It is expected that he will be sentenced then.

Here is the letter to PM Lee in full:

The Prime Minister

Mr Lee Hsien Loong

Republic of Singapore

CC: The Minister for Home Affairs

The Minister for Education

Attorney General

04 July 2015

Dear Prime Minister,

We are writing to register our deep concern as citizens and as parents, teachers and other adults who work with children and young people, over the State’s prosecution of Amos Yee. Besides the negative impact on his wellbeing and that of his family, the harsh treatment he has faced creates a negative environment for all younger members of our society.

We trust and hope that this statement of our concerns will be received in good faith – as a demonstration of our commitment to just and reasonable processes, and our shared concern with the State toward the safe-guarding and nurturing of our young.

In considering our letter, we also urge you to honour Singapore’s commitments under the Convention on the Rights of the Child to always act with the best interests of the child as a primary consideration in all actions undertaken by public institutions.

We are aware of the negative aspects of Amos’ communications. Nonetheless, we are troubled by the State’s harsh reactions to them, including the prosecution’s request for reformative training lasting at least 18 months.

Many of us have been working to nurture our young to take ownership of and participate in matters concerning the wellbeing of Singapore society. As reflected in changes in our education system and programmes targeted at young people in recent years, we want young Singaporeans to be empowered to articulate their thoughts and to present and defend their ideas, even if we disagree with them. As you said only this week, “You want people to stand up, not scrape and bow.”

To learn to conduct themselves, including to forge norms around mutual respect and civil disagreements, young people need to feel safe. Likewise, to continue to encourage our children or students to think creatively, to be active participants in their learning journeys, to enthusiastically stake their claims on social matters, we too have to be assured that such parenting and pedagogical practices will not bring them harm.

The prosecution of Amos Yee has already undone some of the progress we have witnessed among young people, and the prosecution’s call for reformative training threatens to undo even more. Growing up with access to rich sources of information as well as outlets for expression, young people have great potential for being engaged citizens. While we may not agree with everything that they say or do, we must ensure that they continue to feel safe in venturing out, and that making mistakes will not mean they will be punished in ways that compromise their well-being and/or stigmatise their futures.

We are deeply concerned by information circulating in social media that Amos has been shackled and subjected to treatment that is generally meant for mature offenders charged with more serious offences.

Moreover, whether or not Amos Yee has mental illness and/or autism, we are concerned that the use of physical restraint and institutionalisation in response to his alleged condition(s) will contribute to the stigmatisation of young people with mental illness and/or autism. Mental health and autism-related needs should be met on a welfare-centred basis, not treated as inherently threatening or violent.

As Amos’ sentencing is due to take place imminently, we ask that the State discharge its prosecutorial functions with caution, sensitivity and generosity in its position and treatment of the child.

While all persons, including young people and children, should learn to respect other members of society, prosecution and detention is not the best way to teach/learn. Witnessing the severe consequences faced by Amos and his parents, many young people will hold back from genuine engagement and exploration; parents, teachers, and other adults who work with our youth will be wary of encouraging young people to be courageous and unafraid of making mistakes. We can make every claim to encourage independence of thought and creativity, but if our actions reveal an inability to tolerate non-conformists, young people will view our exhortations to speak up as mere platitudes. This will be a deep loss not just for Amos and his family, but also for the future of Singapore society.

Yours Faithfully,

Adlina Maulod Denvy Lo Priscilla Chia
Aishah Othman Dickson Su Rachel Zeng
Alfian Bin Sa’at Elaine Ee Ranjana Raghunathan
Alvin Tan Cheong Kheng Elia Corina Dorine Shelley Thio
Andre Goh Eng Kai Er Sheena Kanwar
Annamalai Kokila Parvathi Faeza Sirajudin Siew Kum Hong
Audrey Wong Foo Jong Soon Siew Meng Ee
Aw Yang Xun Georgina Lee Soh Seok Keim Shirley
Bernard Lim Chee Guan Goh Li Sian Stephanie Chok
Braema Mathi Indira Arumugam Sun Koh Boon Luang
Carlyn Law Jialiang LIm Sudhir Vadaketh
Catherine Lim Suat Hong Jolene Tan Tan Joo Hymn
Chan Wei-Yin Jaclyn Jolovan Wham Tan Pin Pin
Cheng Seow Wee Michael Kevin Chua Tan Tarn How
Cheng U Wen Lena Lim Siauw Chong Teng Qian Xi
Cherian George Little Ong Teo Liak Theng
Chong Ja Ian Lau Seok Yee Teo You Yenn
Chiong Ai Ni Irene Liew Kai Khiun Thiagarajan Kanaga Sabapathy
Chng Nai Rui Lo Dening Thirunalan Sasitharan
Chng WeiJie, Ivan Low Peter Cuthbert Thum Ping Tjin
Choo Zheng Xi Lynn Lee Wee Sheila Moira nee Wilson
Christina Lee Mandakini Arora Wong Pei Chi
Colin Goh Yong Ping Malvina Tan Woon Tien Wei
Constance Singam Ngiam Su-Lin Yogeswari
Damien Chng Ong Keng Sen Zubaida Ali
Dana Lam Yoke Kiew Prashant Somosundram
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

打包不适任Yes Man进国会 林鼎狠批集选制

人民之声创党人林鼎狠批集选区选举制弊病,把不适任的候选人,和民望较高的资深候选人打包在一起,藉此获选当上国会议员。 林鼎在上周五的脸书贴文,比较我国和英国西敏寺议会制度,指出在英国,即便保守党的后座议员,会把国家前途优先于党的利益,敢于抨击和反抗,该党领袖特蕾莎梅提出的脱欧议程。 在西敏寺制度下,后座议员无政府官职,也不偏反对党,他们坐在下议院的前台(即执政党席位的后座),新加坡的议会制度,也是取材自西敏寺议会范本。 林鼎直言,只有当所有国会议员,在议会表决时把国家利益摆在党利益之前,议会民主才能正常运作。这正是英国保守党后座议员展现的代议士素质! “即使知道他们的行为可能让党失去政权,但选择在国家大义前,放下党派成见。” 讥行动党后座议员成“Yes Man” 他不忘抨击人民行动党后座议员,在议会中只愿当“应声虫”(Yes Man)。结果,整体议会素质灾难性地下降,议会辩论差强人意,议员们糟糕的出席率也落人笑柄。 他说,正是饱受抨击的集选区选举制,把不合格的人选送进国会,才导致今日议会素质崩坏的局面。 为此,他扬言人民之声若得以执政,将废除集选区制度,铲除掉这个议会民主的毒瘤。 在林鼎的另一则贴文,则强调铲除精英主义、落实直接民主的重要。他对教育部长王乙康,认为新加坡必须成为一党制国家才能生存,不敢苟同。…

Bukit Panjang SMC political broadcast: SDP and PAP candidates’ differing points on LRT construction

While speaking at the first constituency political broadcast for Bukit Panjang SMC,…

Singapore Contractors Association appeals to government that they cannot afford to bear the cost of testing migrant workers

Employers should not bear the cost of COVID-19 swab tests for migrant…

The man at Waterloo Street

Andrew Loh meets an old man selling tissue paper outside the temple.