lianhe wanbao

By TREmeritus

Lim Teck Choon (59 years old, unemployed), sold his 3-room flat at Blk 18 Bedok South Rd for $310,000 in December 2010.

The buyer, Ms Hani, was unable to meet the deadline and the sales and purchase transaction was cancelled at one point in time. Subsequently, she managed to get a loan, and was allowed an extension to complete the transaction.

After the delay, Mr Lim was unwilling to proceed with the sale on the original terms and wanted compensation or an increase in the sales price.

However, the sales transaction was completed and since then Mr Lim and his wife have refused to move out of the flat. They have been fined $2,500 for failing to comply with a court order to do so.

Last Friday (26 Jun), Mr Lim told the Chinese media that he has received a letter asking him to move out of the flat on the same day by 2.30pm. But he was firm about staying put and said, “They will take my flat over my dead body.”

When a reporter from the Chinese press arrived at the flat, it was found that the items inside were not packed and there was no indication of Mr and Mrs Lim’s intention of moving out.

Later, at about 3 pm, a group of 5 persons consisting of the bailiff, lawyers and locksmiths, armed with a Writ of Possession, arrived at the flat to take possession of it. A commotion ensued and the police had to intervene.

Seeing the group of people coming to take possession of his flat, Mr Lim opened the iron grille gate and started shouting at them.

He told them that he was suffering from cancer in its final stage. He had sold his flat to get some cash to buy Chinese herbs for his illness. But after selling the flat, all the proceeds were locked up in his CPF account and he couldn’t touch a single cent. As a result, he refused to move out of his flat.

He shouted, “You want me to let you have the flat, but I didn’t get the money! I have appealed to the minister.”

When the police arrived, Mr Lim didn’t calm down but continued scolding. In the course of the commotion, Mr Lim dashed towards lawyer Mohd Ibrahim and tried to push him. As the lawyer dodged Mr Lim, Mr Lim lost his balance and fell. The policemen then quickly stepped in to block Mr Lim.

A minute or two later, after making sure that Mr Lim posed no harm to the lawyer, the policemen helped him to his feet.

As Mr Lim refused to budge, the group went away after leaving the court documents behind.

Mr Lim said that he is suffering from end stage cancer and is not afraid to go to jail. He repeatedly said that he has nose cancer and the cancerous cells have spread to the lymph nodes. He is a person waiting to die, he said. The doctor told him that it is a miracle he is still alive.

He said that the last time the lawyer came to his flat, his wife was so agitated that she had an epilepsy attack. Subsequently, the lady buyer got a court order for Singapore Power to cut off his electrical and water supply. Also, the police have entered his flat to remove his belongings. All these things made him angrier.

One may not “see the money” after selling one’s HDB flat

An HDB flat has been touted as an asset which can help one’s retirement. Many Singaporeans like Mr Lim think so too. Many people think that selling their HDB flat will help them get out of financial trouble.

On the contrary, Mr Lim’s case proves that selling one’s HDB flat does not necessarily give one cash.

Mr Lim, a man with a terminal illness, needs cash to seek treatment for a chance to live the last chapter of his life with dignity. He thinks he can do so by cashing in on his sole asset: his HDB flat. Imagine hia horror when he finds out that the proceeds of sale which he so desperately needs, are locked away out of his reach because of the CPF Minimum Sum requirement.

Presently, those who are 55 years old on or after 1 July 2015 must set aside a Full Retirement Sum (i.e. Minimum Sum for those with no property pledges) in one’s CPF account of $161,000.

It’s sad that Mr Lim who is suffering from terminal illness isn’t allowed to use his own CPF money for medical treatment. What is the reason for this?

It’s no wonder he is prepared to go to jail because in jail, he would at least enjoy free medical treatment as an inmate.

Will our Minister of National Development Khaw Boon Wan make an exception for Mr Lim?

What do you think?

This article was first published at TREmeritus

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Foreigners boost Singapore economy, says PM Lee

With Singapore winning its first Olympics medal in 48 years, the issue of foreign talents is again brought to the fore. The Government insists that foreign talents is good for the economy. But does it bring other problems which are being swept aside?

凯发永久债券主理商 金管局:星展银行无不当行为

凯发集团在2011年和2016年分别发售四亿元优先股和五亿元永久证券,星展银行(DBS)是这两批证券的主理商和承销商。不过,金融管理局表示,该银行在销售上述证券的安排上并没出现不当行为。 金管局是回应彭博社的询问,指出星展银行作为凯发的永久证券主理商,符合监管要求,进行了尽职调查,以确保在发售说明书上,有披露有关开发的相关重要信息。 金管局举例,星展银行有提醒投资者,在购买前应,必须详读说明书。 “所有投资都有风险,”金管局补充,“凯发财务陷困导致投资者损失就是一例。” 此外,金管局也解释,通过自动提款机认购政权的做法,从1993年就开始了,为投资者提供便利来认购新股和债券。 目前,随着凯发宣布终止与印尼财团SM投资的重组协议,凯发向投资者们保证,仍会继续寻求可行的策略,在法庭监督下完成重组过程。 凯发也可能继续争取保有大泉水电厂的所有权,或向高庭再申请延长,原本4月底即将到期的债务延期偿付令,不过相信届时必须提出很好的理由,证明该公司能提供更好的替代方案和避免清盘。 不过,凯发也曾指出,无法保证该公司能成功找到新的“白武士”,或为重组计划找到其他替代方案。 日前,新加坡证券投资者协会会长杰乐则告诉《海峡时报》,已和凯发总裁林爱莲取得联系。据后者表示,董事会将尽快联系之前与SM投资一起参与竞标凯发的其他有意投资方。 凯发董事会需要一些时间与这些潜在投资方协商,并希望能有一些时间和空间寻求其他方案,避免凯发清盘。  

SGC: Tripartite partnership can help preserve Singaporean workforce during pandemic

As the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic worsens, the more than 8,000…

Safety netting put up along parts of Changi Jurassic Mile following recent incident of woman hit by stray golf ball

Safety netting was put up along parts of Changi Jurassic Mile on…