Lee
Lee
Lee

In remarks reminiscent of those he has made in the past, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said the Government would go “extinct” if it helped those who voted against it “first”.

“If we take the view that if you voted against me, I should help you first (as) that shows my largeness of spirit, then I think you will go extinct as a government,” Mr Lee said.

He made the remarks during a dialogue on Thursday hosted by Washington Post columnist, Fareed Zakaria, at a Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) conference titled, “Singapore at 50: What Lies Ahead?”.

Mr Lee was responding to Mr Zakaria’s opinion that Singapore was one of the only developed economies in the world that has not transitioned to a multi-party liberal democracy.

“We are a multi-party liberal democratic system,” Mr Lee said. “The outcome is not what you would like to see, but that is what Singaporean voters have decided.”

A month before the general election of 2011, Mr Lee also made similar remarks about how those who voted against his ruling party, the People’s Action Party (PAP), would be left at the back of the queue for government programmes.

A student at a ministerial forum at the National University of Singapore (NUS) had asked Mr Lee, who was the guest speaker, why residents in opposition-held Hougang were being penalised when it came to upgrading programmes by the Housing and Development Board (HDB).

“The answer is that there has to be a distinction. Because the PAP wards supported the Government and the policies which delivered these good things,” PM Lee told the 1,200 students in the audience.

“Between the people who voted and supported the programme and the government, and the people who didn’t,” he explained, “I think if we went and put yours before the PAP constituencies, it would be an injustice.”

Mr Lee’s remarks then created a huge uproar, with many criticising his government for discriminating against Singaporeans based on who they voted for, and for using taxpayers’ funds to induce or coerce political support.

Yahoo Singapore, April 2011
Yahoo Singapore, April 2011

“I thought that as PM, he was there to represent ALL the people, without favour or preference,” said one commenter online. “He is not the PM of just those he voted for, but for each and every Singapore citizen, including those who did not vote for him or his party… How can the PM say that if you vote for PAP, you get nice chocolate cake and coffee, but if you vote for other party you only get water and biscuit?”

Another person posted: “Upgrading is not delivered solely based on policies. It is driven by money from the reserves. The money comes from the people and not from PAP.”

The PAP saw its vote share slide to its lowest ever at the 2011 elections, which also saw it lose a group representation constituency (GRC) for the first time. The party also subsequently lost two by-elections following that.

The Government has had to tread a tight-rope since then, especially when it came to discriminatory government practices or policies.

Channel Newsasia, April 2015
Channel Newsasia, April 2015

This could be seen just three months ago, in April, when the Minister of Social and Family Development, Tan Chuan-Jin, struck a seemingly different tune, and said the Government “will work for the people, regardless of who they vote for.”

“I think one of the things we have always believed in is to try and do the right thing. It is really important for us as a small country and I think we will continue to do that,” he said while on a visit to the opposition constituency of Aljunied.

The theme of inclusiveness has been a recurring one in government ministers’ speeches for the longest time.

In fact, on Tuesday, Mr Lee reiterated his government’s commitment to building such a society which, he said, included being gracious towards each other.

“We really want a society which is cohesive and graciousness is an important part of this,” he said at another dialogue at the Singapore Management University.

“Graciousness meaning we are about each other, we feel for each other, we are not just in a rat-race, but we are in a team together.”

He said that despite competing with each other, we also have to “work together, we feel together.”

“I think graciousness therefore is an important part of this,” he said. “You do not want to be a place where you are rich, you live in one little circle, if you are poor, you are cut out from that circle. We are all Singaporeans together, we all eat at hawker centres from time to time, we all visit the same places, even when we go on holiday, we do not go on such drastically different places for holiday and we meet each other overseas. That is the right sort of society we want to be.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

民主党申请要求撤回更正指示 遭人力部驳回

新加坡民主党在上周五(3日)向人力部长杨莉明,申请要求撤回针对该党三则贴文发出的更正指示。 不过,昨日(6日)人力部发文告,表示经过谨慎考量,认为民主党的申请没有充分理据,故此拒绝撤回指示。不过,文告并未详细解释,民主党的申请为何理据不足。 民主党拟诉诸法律行动 对此,民主党也发文告回应,人力部也无法为他们的决定提出理据,并反驳该党提出申请时,也已列出详细理由,包括人力部数据分析和该党贴文的对比。 该党也透露有意诉诸法律行动。 上月14日,人力部透过《防假消息法》办事处,援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),针对民主党的脸书贴文和文章,发出要求更正指示。 人力部反驳本地PMET的就业率自2015年实则逐步增长;且并没有出现本地PMET裁员增加的趋势。 民主党则指出,该党文章指的是“失业”( “unemployment”),却被人力部误植为“裁员”(”retrenchment”),张冠李戴,该党却为此被人力部指控发布“虚假事实”。

Revocation of Hong Lim Park as “unrestricted area” till further notice

The 2013 Order designating Hong Lim Park as an “unrestricted area” under the Public Order Act has been revoked this morning.

内政部拟修改交通法令 违规驾驶刑罚或加重

在修改公路交通法令的建议中指出,被判罪严重违反交通规矩的驾驶者,可能面对更严重的刑罚。 内政部今天(2月21日)指出,严重的违法行为包括了驾驶者严重违规的驾驶行为,和造成他人蒙受严重伤害,将会被判处更长的监禁和更昂贵的罚款。 糟糕的驾驶行为包括了酒后驾驶,以及没有通行权下超车。 分成危险和粗心驾驶 内政部建议将不负责任的违规驾驶行为区分成危险驾驶和粗心驾驶,,在进一步依据所造成的伤害效果,细分成四个类型。 内政部表示,虽然危险驾驶和粗心驾驶,与刑事法典中的轻率行为和疏忽行为相对应,但是这两种罪行的最高刑罚都会比刑事法典所规定的最高刑期更长,罚款更高。就以危险驾驶来说,一旦定罪,最高刑期可以从5年增加到8年;若导致死亡或严重伤害,最低刑期为期1年。 若被定罪为粗心驾驶,并导致伤者死亡,最高刑期将从原本的2年增加到3年。犯罪者也将面对最低强制性惩罚。 内政部兼国家发展部高级政务次长孙雪玲指出,“尽管我们的执法和教育了,仍然有驾驶者进行危险行为的驾驶或乘坐交通工具,如反方向驾驶、在没有发出警示或讯号灯的情况下转弯” 。 她今早主持在公路安全园举行的“2019提高公路意识,加强交通安全” 活动启动仪式时,作出上述宣布。 重犯处罚加倍…

Church of Our Saviour clarifies “allegations”

Aware exco is not a pawn of the church, says Pastor Derek Hong in statement.