van Deijzen
van Deijzen
van Deijzen

Just two weeks after he was sentenced to a three weeks’ jail for assaulting a taxi driver, 34-year old Dutchman Dino Petrus Johannes van Deijzen saw his sentence increased to three months.

The deputy public prosecutor had appealed the original sentence, saying the judge in that case, District Judge Imran Abdul Hamid, seemed to have been convinced by van Deijzen’s portrayal of himself as a victim.

The Dutchman, a design executive, had claimed that the taxi driver, Me Ee Kah Ling, had also hit him, resulting in the former losing consciousness.

Justice Imran was reported to have “noted that the victim had also engaged in a scuffle with van Deijzen and traded blows, which would have explained the blunt force trauma suffered by the accused.”

However, justice Tay rejected this.

He said Mr van Deijzen’s claims were “convenient excuses to downplay his use of inexcusable violence” against Mr Ee, 42.

Further, justice Tay noted that Mr van Deijzen was not remorseful and that there were neither an offer of compensation to Mr Ee noran apology from the Dutchman.

Mr van Deijzen and his girlfriend were reportedly intoxicated when they hailed and boarded Mr Ee’s cab at Dunlop Street at almost 1am on 21 October.

They asked to be ferried to blk 538 in Ang Mo Kio.

When the taxi reached the destination, Mr van Deijzen’s girlfriend vomited in the taxi.

Mr Ee then asked the couple to leave the car and asked for the fare.

The couple, however, ignored him and walked away without paying.

At this point, Mr Ee threatened to call the police, and was retrieving his phone from his taxi when Mr van Deijzen pounced on him, slammed the door and punched Mr Ee.

Me Ee tried to escape and ran away, but Mr van Deijzen gave chase and pushed him to the ground, and continued to punch and kick Mr Ee.

The heinous act was caught by the in-vehicle CCTV of Mr Ee’s taxi.

Soosay (Photo: Straits Times)
Soosay (Photo: Straits Times)

Also in June, National University of Singapore (NUS) law professor, Sundram Peter Soosay, 43, has been found guilty of assaulting a taxi driver while drunk.

Mr Soosay, who is a Singapore permanent resident and has been working at NUS since 2008, was lambasted by District Judge Victor Yeo in court.

Judge Yeo said Mr Soosay’s testimony was “riddled with hindsight reasoning, convenient conjecture and hypothesis”.

Judge Yeo then sentenced the law professor to four months jail and ordered him to compensate the taxi driver, 71-year old Sun Chun Hua. (See here.)

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

总理重申身体不适才需戴口罩

我国总理李显龙昨晚(30日)发文,表示理解国人无法买到口罩的焦虑,但重申只有身体不适时才需要戴口罩。 “我理解您们的无法在零售店买到口罩的焦虑。因为新加坡各地都急于买口罩。过去九天已向零售商发出500万口罩,但是需求比预期来得高。” 他指出,卫生部建议只有生病时才需要戴口罩。如果身体健康就不用。 总理也强调政府已动员武装部队、人民协会等机构,为民众准备口罩。有人再次重申将确保那些感到不适和需要口罩的新加坡人,都能得到供应。 昨日政府宣布,将派发多达520万个口罩,予国内130万户家庭。平均每一户新加坡籍家庭,可获分配四个手术口罩。这是一次性的派发口罩活动,总理也提醒,领取者需携带身份证核实身份。 “请留意卫生部的建议,了解什么时候才该使用口罩、如何正确使用口罩。保持良好个人卫生和对社会负责,是我们抵抗病毒的最佳保护。”  

Netizens disagree with experts’ opinion that accepting low salary jobs as fresh graduates will not affect their career

Human resource experts pointed out that fresh graduates have nothing to worry…

国有媒体挑起林鼎私人诉讼 遭非议“转移对重大议题焦点”

人民之声党领导林鼎,非议国有媒体《海峡时报》挑起和炒作其个人法律纠纷,来转移民间对重大社会议题的焦点。 在有关诉讼中,林鼎被中国籍上海公民黄珉(Huang Min)指控拖欠20万新元的贷款,相隔五年未偿还。 “黄珉先生可以提出任何诉讼。但说我会陷入破产是可笑的。过度放大这个私人纠纷,只会分散国民对迫切问题的焦点,例如:公积金、公共组屋、生活成本和天价部长薪资等。” 他在个人脸书分享,昨日在接受《今报》采访时,指出上诉纠纷已上诉到最高法院,也有望上诉成功,他本身是律师,很清楚如何捍卫自己的权益。 私人纠纷上诉最高法院 他要求媒体发布他的完整声明,如果没有,他将自行发布。他也强调,不会再针对私人诉讼对任何国有媒体发表任何谈话,并要求媒体必须做好自己本分,去关注更为重要的民生议题,而不是琐碎新闻。 他在脸书帖文中指出,国有媒体和行动党的网军肯定很乐意炒作他的私人纠纷,藉此转移民众视线。他感谢民众的支持,并表示有能力应对此事。 他解释,在法律界执业17年,他曾转战印尼的采矿业,其公司也是第一家在苏拉威西生产和船运铁矿的公司。 “很多人以为我没生意经验,不会做,但我证明他们错了。在私人企业,纠纷是常有的事,所以我们才需要法律程序。” 林鼎:不排除私人纠纷被可以挑起 他不排除,这个在2013年拖沓至今的私人纠纷又被重新挑起,是“有计划地攻击”。他说,自己一直都是国有媒体和建制派的中坚批评者。…

Home Team contingent departed for Laos

A 32-member Home Team contingent comprising 14 officers from the Singapore Police…