ahpetc

The Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC), run by the Workers’ Party, “will be embarking on direct management” of the town council from July 2015, says an open letter to residents issued by the town council’s chairman, Sylvia Lim.

The decision for direct management was made because there were no takers to the town council’s call for a managing agent in a tender exercise last November.

“We will do our best to keep costs down and protect AHPETC’s long-term financial interests,” Ms Lim, who is also chairman of the WP, says.

The 15-page, four-language letter, which also appears in the latest issue of the AHPETC’s quarterly newsletter, “Good Neighbours”, says that “despite the challenging political climate”, the town council will continue to serve residents to the best of its ability.”

AHPETC would be the second town council to embark on direct management, after the People’s Action Party (PAP) town council of Bishan-Toa Payoh.

The bulk of the AHPETC letter, however, dealt with “misconceptions” which had surfaced in recent months, including charges made against the town council by ministers.

Contracts given to “friends”?

On the charge that AHPETC had allegedly given contracts to “friends”, Ms Lim said it has not.

She says that public tenders were called in 2012, 2014 and 2015 for Managing Agents (MA) and Essential Maintenance and Services Unit (EMSU) services.

“Anyone can submit a bid for a public tender,” the town council letter says. “AHPETC does not and cannot reserve contracts for friends in a public tender.”

Ms Lim then explained why a tender was not called for MA services for the period of July 2011 to July 2012.

AHPETC had taken over the town council after the general elections which took place in May 2011.

The contract was awarded to the then newly formed FM Solutions and Services (FMSS), which consisted primarily of managers and staff from the former Hougang Town Council, Ms Lim says.

“This was in order to ensure a smooth takeover of town management in view of the short time on hand to do so and to avoid any disruption in services to the residents.”

That year, the PAP-run Potong Pasir Town Council had also foregone a public tender for a managing agent. The town council was formerly run by the opposition Singapore People’s Party before the 2011 elections.

“Not calling a public tenderfor an MA contract is allowed under Para 76 of the Town Councils Financial Rules,” Ms Lim’s letter to residents says.

“However, the town councillors did not award a standard three-year MA contract to FMSS at this point, as the Town Council intended to call for a public tender for MA services as soon as possible after takeover of town management has been completed and operations have been stabilised.”

AHPETC “overpaid” MA? Did PAP TCs overpay MAs?

Ms Lim then turned to the allegation that it had “overpaid” its MA, FMSS.

Government ministers have claimed that AHPETC had “overpaid” FMSS by an estimated S$1.6 million a year, and an estimated S$6.4 million over four years.

In particular, Ms Lim pointed to the charts presented in Parliament on the debate on the Auditor General’s report by Law Minister K Shanmugam.

Ms Lim’s letter republished the said charts.

The letter then went into the details of how PAP town councils charged for MA services, and why AHPETC had paid the rates for their own MA.

Ms Lim noted that “MA rates of PAP town councils in 2014 were lower compared to preceding years for six TCs.”

“In 2011, there were eight PAP TCs with MA rates per residential unit over $6, and nine in 2012 and 2013.

“In 2014, the number dropped to five and the ‘weighted average’ MA rate in PAP TCs was the lowest.”

Ms Lim also observed that in 2013, MA rates per residential unit “dropped drastically in 2014 for four PAP TCs even though the MA did not change.”

“East Coast from $6.30 to $5.10; Moulmein-Kallang from $6.63 to $5.80; Pasir Ris-Punggol from $6.25 to $5.50; and Potong Pasir from a high of $7.80 to $5.80.”

For commercial units, Ms Lim noted that prior to 2014, “some MAs of PAP TCs practiced [sic] charging a higher rate for managing commercial property compared to residential property.”

“For example, the MA rate for commercial units at East Coast and Pasir Ris TCs were $11.50 when the residential rates were in the range of $6,” the AHPETC letter says.

In 2014, this practice was apparently changed – all MAs managing PAP TCs adopted a flat rate for both residential and commercial units.

“Hence, by taking the 2014 rates only, the commercial rate of $14.92 for AHPETC stood out compared with the flat rates of PAP TCs,” Ms Lim says.

“In any case, if we use the same logic of the ministers to derive at ‘overpayment’ estimates, PAP TCs such as Tanjong Pagar (77,300 units), Nee Soon (65,000 units) and Sembawang (67,000 units) are also overpaying their MAs by around $860,000, $530,000 and $550,000 a year respectively.”

Ms Lim says she is not alleging that the three PAP town councils are in fact overpaying their MAs.

“My point is that comparing the MA rates of a TC to the ‘weighted average’ of MA rates for all TCs is not a good way to judge the fairness of rates charged by the MA,” she explains, adding that the charts presented to Parliament reflect the different geography and requirements of each town councils.

Using former PAP ATC as reference point

Ms Lim explains that AHPETC had used the rates charged by the PAP’s town council, Aljunied Town Council (ATC), prior to the PAP’s defeat in the constituency in the 2011 elections, as reference point for its own rates.

The ATC had used CPG Facilities Management (CPG) as its MA then.

When FMSS took over the running of the town from CPG in 2011/2012, the contract was based on the rate agreed between ATC and CPG.

“In other words, our contract with FMSS was substantially the same as CPG’s contractual MA rates for the second year, $6.37 for residential unit and $12.80 for commercial unit,” Ms Lim says.

However, Ms Lim also explains that there was a second cost component to be considered for the contract – the costs of the taking over of existing staff of the former Hougang Town Council at their then existing salary and also the costs of some additional staff to help with the handover.

Contracts 2012 and 2014

For its tenders for MA services in 2012 and 2014, AHPETC did not receive any competing bids.

“Only FMSS submitted a bid for our public tender for MA in 2012,” Ms Lim says.

“In the absence of a competing bid, we again returned to the CPG contractual rates and used the third year rate (2012) as the reference point.”

The contract was awarded to FMSS at the rate of $7.01 for residential units.

This rate represented an estimated “premium” of approximately 4 per cent compared to the third year CPG rate of $6.73.

One of the reasons for this was the need to operate an additional TC office in Kaki Bukit, and that FMSS had a “lower economies of scale” because it was a smaller operator, compared to CPG.

“We were also aware of the MA rates in several PAP TCs being in the range of $6 to $7 at the time of the tender, ie in 2012,” Ms Lim’s letter says.

“The subsequent rise in FMSS’ contractual MA rate from $7.01 in 2012/2013 to $7.43 for 2013/2014 for residential units mirrors the annual 6 per cent rise in the CPG contractual MA rates for residential units,” she added.

“To summarise, our contractual commitments with FMSS have been based on strict reasoning using available market information in 2012 when tender was called in the absence of competing bids, while placing residents’ interests in undisputed services at the forefront,” Ms Lim says.

Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

5 Minutes With… Leong Sze Hian on NTUC discounts

TOC spends 5 minutes with Leong Sze Hian discussing the NTUC’s U-Stretch vouchers for poorer Singaporeans.

民主党获准对更正指示提出上诉 日期待定

去年12月,人力部援引防止网络假信息和网络操纵法令,要求新加坡民主党在其脸书帖文与网络文章中作出更正。 民主党则申请撤销更正指示,却被驳回。高庭法官昨日(26日)批准民主党,就上述裁决向最高法院上诉庭提出上诉。 去年12月14日,人力部指民主党的三则包括脸书贴文图表与网络文章,均称本地受雇的专业人士、经理、执行员与技师(PMET)人数减少,而外国PMET的受雇则激增,同时民主党也在网络文章中指出本地PMET的被裁率愈来愈高,这些均与事实不符。 对此,民主党亦在今年1月2日作出回应,表示所采用的内容均出自于人力部的数据,因此内容均属实,并要求人力部长杨莉明撤销更正指示,并要求公开道歉。 随后,民主党也入禀高庭,申请撤销人力部的更正指示,而高庭在1月16日与17日进行审理,并于本月初发表书面裁决,驳回民主党的申请。 双方也在聆讯时提出证据,总检察署以代表政府的立场出席,并出示相关数据,表示2015年至2018年间,每1千名本地PMET中的被裁人数有所减少。 而民主党也出示图表显示,2010年至2018年间,每1千名本地PMET中的被裁人数呈上升趋势,以此辩驳。 对此,法官认为,民主党的数据追溯至2010年的论点存在问题,根据人力部的数据,民主党关于本地PMET人数骤减的言论是虚假的。 昨午,民主党向高庭申请,要求针对上述裁决提出上诉。经半小时的内堂审理后,法官予以批准。民主党秘书长徐顺全在庭外告诉媒体,上诉日期待定。 是否会聘请律师参与上诉,徐顺全则表示,“看起来我们似乎必须这样做”,但他也补充,目前仍未与党员达成共识。

环境局民调显示 公民减少浪费食物意识提高

国家环境局民调显示,我国公民在日常作息上更环保,并在减少食物浪费的醒觉上显著提高。 环境局委托机构于今年3月至4月期间,依据2015年的类似民调方式,对1000名随机选择家庭进行面谈而展开,旨在更好地了解消费者对食物浪费的看法、行为和态度。 和2015年相比,今年的受访者明显有了更大进步,包括71巴仙受访者尽量食用冰箱中的剩余食物、64巴仙人士外出用餐时响应“光盘行动”,56巴仙人士将未吃完的食物打包回家。 此外如有摆宴席,约六成人士能做到提供适量或较少的食物,而不会提供过多餐点。有趣的是,有三巴仙的家庭使用厨余做堆肥。 然而,调查也强调了需要改进的部分,包括约四分之一的受访者表示,因为担心家庭成员“吃不够”,会在购物时购买超出所需要的商品。 受访者指出,包括有90巴仙人士表示若能帮助家人省钱且环保,他们会选择减少食物浪费。同时,有近八成受访者要求分享如何储存食物、延长食材寿命及处理多余食物等资讯,以及提供可订购少量食物的饮食场所选择。 当局指出,去年的厨余垃圾达到76万3100吨,与2017年的80万9800吨相比有所下降,然而社会各阶层还需要共同努力,并积极响应,才有可能减少食物浪费。 当局列出各阶层活动 当局举例一些非政府组织和利益团体,一直都在举办的减少食物浪费活动,如食物慈善机构Food from the Heart(FFTH)。FFTH通过将近200个分发点,将剩余食物重新分配给国内的贫困人士,并为参与学校组织年度“光盘运动”。其他的利益团体包括Foddscape…

Masagos Zulkifli urges Singaporeans to play their part amid Circuit Breaker, or else 28 days may not be enough

Ten days into the Circuit Breaker, about 50 people were still caught…