Soosay (Photo: Straits Times)
Soosay (Photo: Straits Times)
Soosay (Photo: Straits Times)

National University of Singapore (NUS) law professor, Sundram Peter Soosay, 43, has been found guilty of assaulting a taxi driver while drunk.

Mr Soosay, who is a Singapore permanent resident and has been working at NUS since 2008, was lambasted by District Judge Victor Yeo in court.

Judge Yeo said Mr Soosay’s testimony was “riddled with hindsight reasoning, convenient conjecture and hypothesis”.

Judge Yeo then sentenced the law professor to four months jail and ordered him to compensate the taxi driver, 71-year old Sun Chun Hua.

The accused could have been sentenced to up to two years’ jail and a fine of S$5,000.

The assault took place at about 5am on Christmas Day, 2013.

Mr Soosay had boarded Mr Sun’s cab after a Christmas gathering, and later vomited in the taxi. He alighted near King Albert Park along Clementi Road and walked away without paying his fare.

Mr Sun chased after him for it and threatened to call the police on Mr Soosay. The latter then handed a $50 note to Mr Sun, who walked back to his cab to get the change.

Suddenly, Mr Soosay pounced on the elderly driver, striking him from behind, knocked him to the ground and punched his face repeatedly.

It was an eye-witness who saw the scuffle and shouted at the two to stop. The man also noted that Mr Sun “did not look like he was capable of defending himself.”

That eye-witness was later identified as Matthew Auw, who later also testified at the trial.

It was also Mr Auw who took Mr Sun to hospital to receive medical treatment for his injuries.

In his judgement, judge Yeo noted that the attack took place at a time when there was less foot traffic and that Mr Sun was at his most vulnerable.

“I did not sense any remorse (in you), and you have a lackadaisical attitude towards compensation,” the judge told Mr Soosay in court on Friday.

Sun
Sun

Judge Yeo also described Mr Sun as a victim of gratuitous violence, and that he had been unable to work for 17 days after the attack.

Mr Sun too has been so traumatised by the incident that he has stopped picking up drunk passengers altogether.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Michael Quilindo asked for a sentence of between four to six months. He  said that Mr Soosay had “clobbered the victim relentlessly”. He added that Mr Sun had done nothing to deserve the assault.

Mr Sun’s daughter, Emily Sun, had posted online about the assault on her father at the time.

Ms Sun's FB post
Ms Sun’s FB post

She described how the assault happened:

“When my father open the door, suddenly this idiot took something and hit at the back of my father head.. he keep on beating him until my father head bleed.. this man stil not happy and turn my father and took something and bit his forehead.

“My father told me on that time he have no energy and no strength to push him away and he give up (my father is aready 70 years old )..”

In the meantime, Mr Soosay’s biodata is still listed on the NUS website here.

It lists his special interest as “jurisprudence” and that he taught “Introduction to Legal Theory”.

“Originally from Malaysia, Sundram Soosay has lived in Scotland for the past 20 years,” the NUS website says. “He graduated from Strathclyde University in Glasgow, before going on to spend an extended period at Edinburgh University, where he obtained his LLM and PhD, and later held positions as a research associate and a teaching fellow.”

In a statement in May, an NUS spokesman said Mr Soosay had been suspended without pay, and the university “will now determine what further disciplinary action should be taken”.

It is also not known if his permanent residency status will be revoked.

Meantime, Mr Soosay will be appealing his sentence and has been released on $20,000 bail.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Conspiracy against Singapore – MM Lee

There is a conspiracy to do us in. Why?… They see us…

130 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 127 locally transmitted cases, 75 linked to Jurong Fishery Port cluster and 5 belong to KTV cluster

As of Saturday noon (24 July), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

若确认国家安全、经济受威胁 陈如斯:总统有权宣布紧急状态

新加坡前进党秘书长陈清木早前建议,若本届政府期限到期疫情仍持续,可考虑由总统组织临时政府,直至疫情结束才召开选举。 对此,国务资政兼国家安全统筹部长张志贤昨日(25日)在国会反驳上述建议,并指尽管在面对疫情危机当儿召开选举并不理想,但展延大选至超过规定的期限也有违宪法。 他声称这类建议“有误导性且无助现况”,他指经过咨询总检察长意见后,后者认为推迟选举至规定的期限是违宪的。 张志贤强调,只有在宣布紧急状态下,才能展延选举。“尽管我国也曾渡过许多危机,不过自我国独立以来,从未展延政府任期超过宪法的规定以外。” 不过,国人为先党党魁陈如斯同样引述新加坡宪法反驳张志贤,指宪法也赋予总统,若确认局势确实危及国家安全、经济和百姓生计,总统有权发布紧急状态。 他认为,眼下冠状病毒19,已威胁到国人的经济和生活。若疫情拖沓至明年4月仍未消散,有理由可宣布紧急状态并展延选举。 陈如斯曾在2011年,与陈清木医生、陈钦亮和陈庆炎博士等人竞选总统。 陈如斯早前在接受本社专访时曾表示,在疫情危机下若召开选举,政府等同把自身利益摆在国人性命健康之上,是“不负责任的”。 他呼吁政府当前应全力抗疫,反对党也会和政府“同仇敌忾”。但是现在选举反而会分散国人的注意力,无法团结国人力量共同抗疫。 在宪法第150条下,国会依据紧急状态下的合理理据,可制定相关法律,与此同时也可展延选举。 若紧急状态结束,所有在紧急状态下制定的法律即作废,意味着那只是为协助国家渡过紧急情况下的临时措施。

淡马亚:沙斯时期医护人员统筹防疫 部门委会仅坐镇幕后

民主党主席淡马亚指出,有别于目前政府跨部门小组领军冠病19防疫 ,当年沙斯病毒肆虐,都是由医疗人员统筹防疫事务,部门委员会则坐镇幕后,每晚都是由负责防疫的医生向民众报告疫情进展。 他微叹:“也许是时代变了吧。”( I guess that times have changed) 在本月19日的“问问淡马亚”网络直播,有民众询问淡马亚,为何此前仅有少数医生,公开针对政府的防疫措施发声。 他坦言这确实是艰难问题,有一部分因素可能是本地人较不会公开表达看法;但实则在本地疫情开始时,卫生部的医疗人员群组中,例如他医学院同窗的聊天群组,好多人都对防护服、口罩和检测等课题,表达他们的失望。 “但是面向公众,是由跨政府部门防疫小组决策,这稍微有别于当年应对沙斯的做法,部门委会坐镇幕后,由医生领军和对群众报告防疫进展。”…