smrtbusandtrain

SMRT Corp says the remuneration of its president and chief executive office, Desmond Kuek, “is benchmarked to peer companies” and that it “is competitive and at a responsible level.”

Kuek
Kuek

Mr Kuek’s remuneration has been the target of criticisms since the company released its annual report on Monday.

In it, Mr Kuek’s salary was reported to be in the range of between S$2.25 million and S$2.5 million.

This is a multifold increase in just three years.

The former chief of defence force was roped in to head SMRT in October 2012, where he is reported to have been paid S$611,000 for the first six months.

With his new salary range, Mr Kuek is now the highest-paid SMRT CEO the company has ever employed.

His predecessor, Saw Phaik Hwa, who quit amidst widespread unhappiness over service standards, was drawing S$1.85 million at the time.

It was then a record pay scale in SMRT, which was in turn a hike over the previous record of S$1.67 million she received in 2010.

The Straits Times reported on Thursday that Mr Kuek’s salary is also higher than his counterpart at rival transport group, ComfortDelgro, which is a “significantly larger company” compared to SMRT Corp.

Mr Kua Hong Pak, the CEO of ComfortDelgro, was paid between S$1.75 million and S$2 million.

The CEO of SBS Transit, Gan Huay Kiat, received much less than Mr Kuek.

Mr Gan was paid between $500,000 to S$750,000.

Tan
Tan

SMRT Corp director, Tan Ek Kia, told the Straits Times that Mr Kuek’s remuneration package was comparable to those of other “peer companies”.

He also said that “the new CEO’s tasks were more daunting than before.”

Mr Kuek had said in another interview earlier this week that SMRT has “made tremendous progress on many fronts” but that there “is much more to be done to improve rail reliability.”

In December 2014, the TODAY newspaper reported that the number of major MRT delays had hit “a four-year high”.

Read also:

CEOs’ remunerations under fire”.

“SMRT CEO paid $2.2m to $2.5m – a multifold jump in three years?”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizens dissatisfied with MOH decision to stop disclosing detailed updates on community cases; call for transparency

From now onwards, the Ministry of Health (MOH) will be focusing its…

马国首相:若人民认为有需要,或探讨重新落实消费税

马来西亚自去年国阵政府败选后,新政府上任随即宣布取消消费税,以销售与服务税(SST)取代。但近日,政府却表示,若人民认为有需要,或探讨重启消费税(GST)。 首相敦马今日出席内政部安全与公共秩序推介礼,有记者提出马国经济研究院(MIER) 曾指应该重启消费税,并将税率调整至3巴仙,敦马针对此事作出回应。 “如果这是公众需求,我们会探讨会对此进行研究”,他表示。但敦马也表明,该项目不会列入2020年的财政预算案。 据悉,销售及服务税(SST)是只针对特定对象,如生产商或进口商及一些服务业者,但消费税的征税对象几乎涵盖所有人,只要有消费就必须缴税。换言之,从生产商、批发商、零售商、进出口商到最终的消费者,每个层面都必须缴税。但销售及服务税只针对特定对象,如生产商或进口商及一些服务业者。 但SST落实后,许多人仍投诉物价并因此下降,因此民怨四起。日前,《诗华日报》报导,大马经济研究院(MIER)也呼吁政府在2020年财政预算案中,以3%的较低税率,重新落实物品及消费税(GST)。经济智囊机构主席丹斯里卡玛沙烈(Tan Sri Kamal Salih)形容消费税反而更显公平,而且该系统也在2015年原油价格下跌至每桶36美元时,平衡了政府的收入来源。 对此,马国消费人联合会(FOMCA)则表示,消费税已给予众人许多负面形象,例如以往6巴仙税率,特别是在必需品上,已经给人民带来很重的负担,故若要重启恐怕不易实行。

DBS is the leading bookrunner for companies which defaulted on Singdollar bonds

According to a Business Times report today (‘Insolvency limbo: the SGD bond…

TOC TV – Drawing of the Singapore Reserves 55 times?

This week on TOC TV, Uncle Leong and Terry talks about the…