Mr Scarlett leading the passengers to protest against Scoot

A 21 hour delay for Scoot flight TZ8 from Singapore to Perth caused many passengers to run riot at Changi Airport. The plane, which was originally scheduled to depart from Singapore at 12.10pm on Saturday (20 June), would only depart at 9.50am on Sunday morning (21 June) due to a technical issue. Despite the 21 hour delay, the flight only took off at 10.42am, instead of the scheduled time of 9.50am.

Multiple delays, Multiple excuses.

Mr Will Scarlet, who was a passenger of the flight, shared his account of the delay on YouTube. His account takes issue with the lack of care for the vulnerable like the elderly and the young and the failure of Scoot to provide accommodation and transport for the affected passengers.

We requested that priority passengers (elderly and with children) be provided with a flight on an alternative airline and was rejected at every turn by the Scoot rep. Passengers searched and confirmed availability despite being told there was none.

The flight has been rescheduled 7 times so far. We boarded and disembarked the flight twice due to tyres being worn beyond safety regulations (as advised by the captain) and then at approx 18.30 due to the staff exceeding the duty allowance onboard (as advised by the captain). Due to other regulations the captain had to leave to sleep and we are currently stuck here with no one to help. A women was also pushed by a member of scoot staff or changi airport staff (at this point it is unclear) but the video captures this moment.

The duty of care provided and inhumanity of this business model is alarming, but the way people came together to protest as one was inspiring and unheard of in Singapore.

[youtube id=”muGbhWvSofw” align=”center” mode=”normal”]

In another video, Mr Scarlett could clearly be heard shouting “This man’s job (Scoot Representative) is to make us keep quiet and go home, that is what we should not do. Stay united!”

Mr Scarlett leading the passengers to protest against Scoot
Mr Scarlett leading the passengers to protest against Scoot

No Transport and Accommodation for overnight delay.

As evident in the many comments on Scoot’s Facebook page, one of the passenger’s main grievances was how there was no transport and accommodation provided despite the overnight delay. TOC also understands that Singaporeans were told to return home while foreigners were left stranded at the airport.

Ms Tay Yu Ting shares her account of the announcement.

The spokesperson who was sent down told us that “Singaporeans to go home and as for foreigners, we apologize that scoot’s policy do not offer hotel stay for you”. Shouldn’t scoot be more professional by offering a place to sleep instead of asking Singaporeans to go home and asking foreigners to find a solution themselves?

This approach, however, was inconsistent with the accommodation provided by Scoot just two days earlier when a Scoot flight from Hong Kong was delayed by 23 hours. When Scoot flight TZ 221 which was scheduled to depart from Hong Kong at 7.10am on June 19 was delayed till 7pm on June 20, affected passengers were provided accommodation at a Hong Kong hotel.

 

This inconsistency was one of the arguments raised by the affected passengers of TZ8 as to why they should be entitled to accommodation and transport for the overnight delay.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

点出数关键问题 殷吉星吁勿轻易落实《防假消息法》

对于打击网络假消息,前人民行动党法律顾问兼国会议员殷吉星(Inderjit Singh)表示,新加坡可能在这方面领先多国,但前提是将《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》“做对”(done right)。 殷吉星曾于1996年至2015年期间,担任国会议员,这些年也身兼多职,包括担任财政部以及贸易和工业部的国会委员会(Government Parliamentary Committee)。 根据他5月1日刊登于《南华早报》文章中,殷吉星指《防假消息法》是虽合乎时宜,但他提醒政府不应轻视各界提出的忧虑,推行这草案的风险很高,且涉及面极广,会带来深远影响。 多个公民社会组织和专家,此前已发声发表达他们的关注,认为《防假消息法》赋予的过大权利、模糊定义的条款等,将会对言论自由产生影响。 殷吉星虽认同,部长应对假消息作出迅速决定,但他也提醒新草案提供的追索上诉权益仍不足。如果涉事者要上诉,却必须向下令采取行动的部长提呈,间中无可避免会出现偏差。 上诉程序需简易可负担得起 再者,人们也质疑向法庭上诉的程序,这对很多人来说都是经济负担。 就这些问题,殷吉星建议,设立独立委员会来审查上诉案件,而不应由让部长本身来负责。…

“合法必要”公开信息行为 智慧国数码政府署:莫与个资被盗案例混为一谈

日前本社报导,一名单亲妈妈蔡女士(译音),因为被诊断患有红斑狼疮,自2016年起就一直待业。她想申请提早领出公积金过活和养活家人,遗憾的是被当局拒绝。她在上月15日,写信给新加坡总统哈莉玛求助。 对此公积金局在脸书作出回应,并直接公开蔡女士全名,详述蔡女士治疗过程、其女儿获得政府助学金等财务状况。 这已不是公积金局在声明中,直接公开公积金局成员的名称。过去一些在网络上对于公积金局申诉者,都被当局直接公开点名。 不过,智慧国及数码政府署在前日回应媒体询问,认可政府“合法及必要”的公开信息行为,却“不应与公民资料未经授权被盗的案例”混为一谈。 “需捍卫公共信任” 当局称,相关单位作出澄清,是为了让民众对详情有更全面的理解。公开特定个资,也是为了传达可核实的事实,且如有必要让个体对政府的个案作出质询。 “公共机构需捍卫公众赋予他们的信任,并确保公民不被误导。” 当局也举例,个人资料保护委员会,也同样允许私企公开个资,以厘清一些个体作出的误导性指控。 当局指公共机构需遵守《公共部门(治理)法》以及政府指南中的资料保护守则,且与个人资料保护法的需求同样严格。

公积金和公共组屋的计时炸弹

人民之声党成员毕博渊(Brad Bowyer),将我国中央公积金制度,和德国及丹麦的养老金制度作比较。 他指出,德国的养老金基金总额达到2千680亿美元,虽然略低于我国,但该国有8千240万人口,其中25巴仙超过65岁。 “虽然人民平均的储蓄缴交率只有18.7巴仙(而且还是雇员和雇主对半),德国养老金仍能至少给出1千175欧元(约1800新元)的入息。” 毕博渊质疑,何以比我国规模稍小的德国养老基金,却能回报给更多会员们5-6倍的回酬? 至于丹麦人口有575万,和新加坡差不多。不过他们的养老基金只有1千600亿美元。当地雇员一方面缴税,也要缴交平均12巴仙的养老金。但是退休雇员至少可以领回每月4千元的入息。 《财经时报》前总编提醒部分公积金转到房产上 毕博渊的观点一出,也引来正反双方网民积极参与辩论。有者感谢毕博渊道出了我国公积金制度的不足,不过《财经时报》(Business Times)前总编Mano Sabnani则提醒,公积金的终身入息只是一小部分,事实上,公积金的储蓄很大部分也倍转换成房地产–被用来买房子。 Sabnani指出,公积金会员在55岁可以提出最低储蓄额以外的钱,但是如果会员还有买房子,那么留在公积金里的储蓄就更少,如果如此可以领取的终身入息也不会很多。 他也提及,也有一些低收入劳工或家庭主妇的公积金积蓄也相对较低。他不认同把我国公积金和德国、丹麦养老金一概而论,因为他们把所有储蓄都放在退休金里,而不是像我国国民需要用在房屋、健保储蓄等用途,自然退休后领取的入息就较高。…

Softer, progressive approach towards urban redevelopment needed: Senior Minister Puthucheary

The Singapore government needs to shift its approach towards urban redevelopment and…