Cordlife ptd ltd
Screengrab from Cordlife Pte Ltd’s website

 

In a statement released yesterday, the Competition Commission of Singapore (“CCS”) shared that it commenced an investigation on Cordlife Group Limited (“Cordlife”) in relation to its exclusive agreements with baby fair organisers and hospitals in June last year which CCS claims to potentially have the effect of limiting competition from other providers of cord blood bank services in Singapore.

It further went on to state that if these exclusive agreements were found to restrict competition in
the cord blood bank industry, Cordlife would have infringed section 47 prohibition of the Competition Act against the abuse of a dominant position.

Cordlife has since provided CCS with voluntary commitments to remove the existing exclusive arrangements that were the subject of the investigation, and to ensure that it does not have such exclusive arrangements with any baby fair or private maternity hospital in Singapore going forward.

Cordlife will also be required to provide CCS with confirmation that the affected baby fair organisers
and hospital have been informed of the change in Cordlife’s business practices.

Having reviewed the facts and circumstances of the case and on the basis of the commitments, CCS said that it has ceased this investigation on Cordlife’s exclusive arrangements with baby fair organisers and hospitals. However, it also said it would continue to monitor closely on market practices in the cord blood bank industry and reserves the right to reopen investigation should Cordlife breaches any of its commitments.

CCS noted that businesses that are unsure if they fully comply with the Competition Act should seek independent legal advice or consider applying for guidance or decision from CCS. In general, exclusive agreements by a dominant firm that harms competition may be illegal under the Competition Act.

CCS encourages all businesses to proactively put in place competition compliance programmes to ensure their business conduct fully comply with the Competition Act. More information on the Competition Act as well as how to file a complaint or notification for guidance or decision can be found on the CCS website (www.ccs.gov.sg).

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TOC CASSETTED: Invitations to cease by 3 p.m today

Dear Readers, We are reaching the maximum number of people we can…

HDB: MND vs NMP – Round 4

By Leong Sze Hian I refer to the National Development Minister’s letter…

Final-year NTU students launch Drink Wise, Drink Tap campaign to reduce widespread usage of plastic water bottles

In a bid to encourage Singaporeans to reduce plastic waste resulting from…

“已自掏腰包付60万律师费” 工人党三领袖向民众募捐诉讼费用

陷入工人党市镇会风波,工人党前党魁刘程强、主席林瑞莲和秘书长毕丹星,透过专为诉讼案设立的网站“秉诚行事”(in good faith),向公众募捐,以应付市镇会诉讼费用。 网页中的募捐文告提到,目前三人面对两项诉讼,指控他们与另外两名市镇会理事会的理事,在管理市镇会时造成损失,并被索赔3千万元。 文告坚称以上指控不属实,指出他们“秉诚行事”,所作决策乃以居民和市镇会利益为依归。 “我们会抗辩到底。如果输了这场官司,就可能得面对赔偿巨额的损失。要是无法偿还,我们会面临破产的后果。” 文告称,从诉讼程序开始到现在,三人动用自己的储蓄和朋友的资助来支付律师费。 ”我们没有用到工人党的钱。单在法庭开庭前的准备工作,我们已经支付了将近60万元的律师费。这笔费用几乎已经掏空了我们个人的经济资源。我们需要经济资源以继续打这场有可能使我们面临破产的官司。” “我们因而向公众募捐。不论捐款多寡,对我们都是重要的!” 博文中有详细列明捐款管道,有兴趣读者请点阅:https://ingoodfaith.blog/appeal-for-support-mandarin/ 有兴趣询问进一步详情,则可电邮到[email protected]与他们联系。三人感谢各界的支持与捐献。