Middle Ground logoBy Howard Lee

Earlier this week, former news website Breakfast Network, which closed following the call to register by the Media Development Authority, experienced a revival – that is, if the closing and re-opening of a website can be called a “revival” without getting chuckles from old hands in the industry.

The Middle Ground was quietly (re)launched on Monday, 15 June, with much of the same people at the helm, and even the Facebook page is a rename of the old Breakfast Network page.

“Other than myself, there is Bertha (Henson), who plays the role of consulting editor,” said publisher Daniel Yap, who also contributes content for the new website. “That basically means she doesn’t have to worry much about all the other aspects of running the company. She is still lecturing at NUS.”

Apart from Henson and Yap, there does not seem to be any other person listed on the website who is making key editorial decisions.

Henson was a former journalist from national broadsheet The Straits Times. Yap was also working with Henson on Breakfast Network, which had to close down because Henson, then in charge of the website, found the registration details required by MDA too onerous to be worth sustaining the website.

However, the team now seems to be a lot better prepared for what MDA can throw it, including the kitchen sink.

“Breakfast Network was a volunteer-run team, although we had incorporated as a company. We decided that it wasn’t worth the risk and hassle that MDA was asking us to sign up for as volunteers,” said Yap.

Henson had said in 2013, when Breakfast Network was forced to close, “We could declare that all revenue came through bona fide commercial transactions, but we would probably need to produce some kind of proof if queried. Does that make it a kind of compliance checklist to ensure we have done due diligence? BN is not even steady on its feet to start thinking about putting in such administrative structures.”

“This time around, we have a stronger financial footing with investors behind us and it is part of the business plan to take on the risk if and when MDA does require us to,” said Yap.

Bertha Henson and Daniel Yap
Bertha Henson and Daniel Yap

The key “risk” might really be MDA’s continual insistence that it’s purpose for regulating social-political news websites in Singapore is to ensure that such websites are not subject to foreign funding. This would have been a problem for websites that, in particular, are backed by foreign companies.

On this count, Middle Ground does not seem to be too concerned. The website is owned by The Middle Ground Pte Ltd, a company co-owned by Yap and Henson, which Yap says shares much of the same goals as the publication.

“We will be funded by the advertising and partnership revenues that are common in media businesses,” related Yap, when asked about where money for the website comes from. “For the initial period, before we become financially stable, we are funded by a group of Singaporean investors as one of many projects that show commercial promise as well as a potentially positive impact on society.”

What, then, is the impact that The Middle Ground hopes to have on Singapore society?

“The Middle Ground is a news, views and news-you-can-use (lifestyle news) portal that wants to serve and foster Singaporeans who consider themselves “middle ground” in one way or another,” said Yap.

“As an addition to Singapore’s online media scene we hope to continue a trend towards professionalising and improving the quality of online news and writing. We want to help make online news a viable and credible industry. We are certainly not alone in this.”

Indeed, shortly before the re-launch, Six-Six, a website that professes to be an “e-viewspaper”.

“Be it business, politics, current affairs, sports or lifestyle issues, SIX-SIX.COM will bring together various views from people in the know. By offering a varied and balanced analysis, this e-viewspaper will challenge readers to think beyond what they glean from mainstream media, and to reach a balanced, considered opinion,” the website’s publisher, Kannan Chandran, wrote in a press release.

Middle Ground scBalanced, credible, quality, lifestyle – this seems to be the current preferred mix that attempts to straddle the mirage of the often-cited mantra of traditional media, with the happening, fast-paced content of online money-making ventures.

The gravitation towards the professed qualities of traditional media is hardly surprising – both Henson and Kannan were former journalists from the newspaper industry.

Indeed, both websites seem to be keen on attracting the same target audience. “We are targeted at people who consider themselves the middle ground,” said Yap, who also said that he was keen to explore collaborations with Six-Six.

“I think that every publication reaches out to the middle ground in one way or another. The middle ground is not un-opinionated or even necessarily “swing voters”. Some are firm supporters of specific causes that can be opposed by other segments of society. The important thing is their ability to engage and coexist and hold those differences in balance and in tension instead of burying their head in the sand and acting like an extremist.”

“We really want to compete and take market share and readership from publications that spread misinformation, or polarise or isolate people. That’s what The Middle Ground is about – we want people to engage and take ownership of their opinions and ideas and be mature enough to have real, cordial conversations with people who disagree.”

Whether people who do not inhabit the middle ground are necessarily those who act like extremists remains a debatable point. But at the very least, Yap seems to have grasped the need to maintain reader trust, a do-or-die in today’s media environment.

“We won’t ever go the route of letting advertisers or sponsors influence our editorial content, of course. This has been an issue with some of the more inexperienced sites and publications but it takes a long-term toll on the credibility of the publication. We respect our readers too much to do that.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

选举期间谁行使《防假消息法》? 各部门常任秘书代行

若国会解散,各部门部长将卸任,届时谁行使《防假消息法》权益? 根据昨日(8日)发布的其中一篇政府宪报,阐述若选举期间,由16政府部门的常任秘书代行。 在《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》下,若选举令状发出,部长停止职权,惟他们的职权可由其他权职者代行,包括高级公务员。 防假消息法是在2019年10月25日宪报。去年4月1日,《防假消息法》正式提呈国会,并在5月8日,经过两天的激辩,晚上10时20分结束前,以72票赞成,九票反对,三票弃权三读通过 2019年6月3日,该法提呈予哈莉玛总统批准。 5月8日的第105次国会会议,《防假消息法》在国会引起朝野激烈辩论,工人党议员表态反对,相续对《防假消息法》提出观点,其中也包括质疑何以新法赋予部长取缔假信息的权力,以及为何绕过司法审讯,由部长先行裁决假消息并采取行动。 人民行动党72议员投下赞成票,工人党的六名议员:毕丹星、林瑞莲、刘程强、方荣发、陈硕茂和费沙,三名非选区议员:贝理安、吴佩松和陈立峰则投下反对票。 《防假消息法》备受争议 该法自提呈国会以来即备受争议,不仅政界人士,包括国内外学术界、媒体、公民组织等都已对该法提出质疑。

国庆“另类”庆祝方式 为本地与永久居民家庭送国庆礼包

今年国庆因疫情关系,将会与往常不同,庆典也将会以别开生面的方式庆祝,为所有本地与永久居民家庭送上国庆礼包。 今年以“心手相连,坚毅向前”(Together, A Stronger Singapore)为主题。庆典将分为两场进行,分别在早上和晚间举行。由总理献辞,随后再由总统哈丽玛检阅在政府大厦前的操场,200人的仪仗队伍。至于参与人数也将减少,据了解,其人数将比往年少了九成。 尽管早上的部分不会进行大量的表演,但民众傍晚可以透过电视和网络直播,一同欢庆,届时将会有80至100人呈现歌舞表演,现场也不会有观众。在庆典最后,全岛也将会有逾10个组屋区燃放烟火,增添热闹气氛。 今年所有国民教育演出和预演将会取消。 另外,国旗飞行致敬和机动部队表演环节也将扩大至全过,直升机将会挂上过去飞跃全岛。然而,各机构的执法人员也会在各个地区巡逻,阻止人群聚集,而表演者也将会采取预防措施。 询及今年的庆典形式是否会降低制作费用,准将 Frederick Choo则拒绝透露更多细节。但他也透露,尽管去年7月已开始筹备庆典,不料今年遇上冠状病毒19,当时也被迫对计划进行删减。  

Pension for ministers – more disclosure, please

Leong Sze Hian / The Prime Minister’s Office and the Minister in…