sea games closing ceremony
SEA Games 2015 has finally come to an end with the closing ceremony held at Sports Hub on Tuesday evening.

As fireworks exploded into the sky from the arena, thousands of fuming ticket holders felt like imploding outside the gate of the Sports Hub’s arena, a far cry from the glitz and glamour of the closing ceremony taking place inside.

In what appears to be a result of overselling tickets and poor management, scenes of chaos erupted outside the Sports Hub last evening as thousands of people who bought tickets were denied entry into the Stadium.

Many who spent as much as $40 buying the highly coveted tickets were disappointed and angry that they couldn’t enter the Sports Hub to attend the closing ceremony.

On the other hand, some volunteers and complimentary ticket holders were able to get seats.

Thousands literally left 'in the dark' outside the Sports Hub
Thousands literally left ‘in the dark’ outside the Sports Hub

Sold out?

Tickets for the closing ceremony, according to Singapore SEA Games Organising Committee (SINGSOC’s) chief of community and corporate outreach, Toh Boon Yi, were sold out for some time before the SEA Games even started.

However, since that statement was made, it was also revealed that apart from the spectators who bought the tickets, there were also two other groups of people who could enter the stadium.

The first group were the SEA Games Volunteers – who could enter by flashing their accreditation passes. The second group were people holding complimentary tickets from sponsors like  NTUC.

Disappointment, Anger and Calls for Refunds

Soon after the Ceremony, SINGSOC made the following announcement on their Facebook page.

Untitled

The statement acknowledged that there were spectators who were unable to be seated for the show and apologised for the inconvenience caused. The statement further stated that those who purchased tickets and was unable to be seated will be offered a full refund. It is, however, unclear how the organizers are going to verify such claims. It was also silent as to the overselling of tickets.

Poor explanation for the mismanagement by organisers

Although some did appreciate the refund, many were left unsatisfied with the poor explanation. The comments section of the post saw many netizens who were appalled by the mismanagement. The statement also raised questions for people who did eventually find seats after missing out most of the show but did not receive any funpack.

11358599_502094969938318_1441216092_n
Comments from SEA Games 2015 fanpage

Some, like Bernadette, even found the seats that they book occupied. Another ticket holder, Andrew, who described his experience as a ‘world class experience in frustration’ said that he was redirected to another stand as the seats he was originally allocated were occupied.

However, upon entry into the stadium, he saw that the entire sector where his seats were was vacant. Also, after the redirection, he only could find standing space, not a seat nor a funpack, in the stadium.

Untitled

Scenes of Chaos

11328926_10153430247608919_241458566_n

Tammy described how bad the scenes were outside the stadium. We can imagine that such scenes may even pose a safety hazard to the elderly, to kids,

11303498_502094619938353_1716258242_n

Another reader, Fabian Lau, who also sent us the pictures above, shared with us his experience waiting for entry with his pregnant wife.

At about 7.30pm, my pregnant wife and I went up to gate 21. The volunteers mentioned that it was full and advised us to go to the other gate where we also heard the same story. I don’t understand, with thousands outside the stadium holding tickets, how can there be a full house? It was only at 8.45pm, where the show was nearing its end, that I was finally let in. The dissapointed did not end there though. I was told by the volunteers that there were no funpacks left but when I made my way to Gate 3, many uncollected funpacks were stacked up. Poor, poor management.

11349890_10153430247623919_2091902702_n (1)

Cheryl Sim’s account of the experience also mirrored Fabian’s account of being ‘yo-yoed’ from gate to gate.

Volunteers, not organizers, bore the brunt.

In such a situation, the least one could expect was an apology or some form of direction from SINGSOC, or representatives from SINGSOC, on the ground itself. However, that was not to be. Instead of the organizers, it was the men and women in purple, the volunteers who had absolutely nothing to do with the mismanagement of tickets and seats, who bore the brunt of the venting ticket holders.

11289737_10153430247618919_1564048492_n

Gloria Mok expressed disappointment at the organization, calling it a ‘total let down by any standard’, but reserved praise for the volunteers. She also added that no one from SINGSOC was seen on the ground to protect volunteers from abuse and to take responsibility for the mismanagement.

Poor Ticket Management for a Poor Show?

Untitled

Just when you thought things couldn’t get worse, it does.

In a detailed post, Nicholas not only lambasted SINGSOC for it’s poor management of the tickets and handling of the elderly and disabled, he also criticized the poor quality of the closing ceremony itself. His mum, who had problems walking due to an injury also faced great difficulty navigating as they had to make their way through many staricases without any escalator in sight.

He also commented that the fireworks were close to none from the view of the spectator in the stadium.

Post-Show Problems

Untitled

Layne was shocked when the taxi she booked was blocked by the police from entering the arena. This came after SIS promised that they have booked more taxis to facilitate the large crowds but after the show many were a large number of people waiting for taxis. She also added that such mistakes were simply unacceptable as it was not the first time they had organized something of this scale.

Overall, to a SEA Games where our athletes and fans were top notch, this slip-shot management from SINGSOC during the closing ceremony will, unfortunately, leave a dent on unfortunate dent in many Singaporeans’ memory of the 28th SEA Games.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

研究显示调高公积金缴交率益处多 网民斥恐加剧年长雇员觅职困境

本地主流媒体《联合早报》报导,一项研究指若55岁至64岁员工的公积金缴交率保持和年轻人一样,那10年间就能累积超过14万元,能提高年长者工作意愿,他们的公积金入息甚至足于缴交房贷。 但是网民们对此的反应似乎一面倒,表示难以接受,因为提高公积金缴交率不仅减少了现有的可动用资金,甚至会让年长雇员更难觅得工作,因为雇主的公积金缴交率也提高了。 这项由新加坡政策研究所演技研究员进行的模拟推算发现,若是将55岁至64岁员工的公积金保持和55岁之前一样,他们的退休储蓄可在10年内累积超过14万元,退休后的每月入息也会因此增加超过一倍。 这项由该研究所高级研究员余国安和副研究员黄锐洲展开的研究,假设一名员工在55岁后的公积金缴交率保持和年轻员工一样,那么在从55岁到64岁之间,其普通和特别户头储蓄能够在这10年间累积多少。 终身入息可增加150巴仙 有关的研究以人力部公开的数据,估算了55岁到59岁员工的大概月薪金额后进行推算,发现最低和最高的第10个百分位的员工,能够累积到3万1056元至14万5117元。研究人员推算发现员工在10年内,累积的储蓄能增加三倍,月薪处于第20个百分位的员工,储蓄从2万5610元增加到6万6524元;处于中位数的员工的储蓄从5万1557元增加到13万3923元。 如果将这些额外储蓄纳入公积金终身入息计划(CPF LIFE)中,月薪处于第20个百分位的员工在65岁起,每月能领的入息将从166元增加到414元,增幅约150巴仙;月薪处于中位数的员工每月入息,也将从326元增至777元,增幅为140巴仙。 他们也发现若只是把缴交率提高一个百分比,处于第20个百分位的员工也能够在10年期间多存约5000元,每个月的公积金终身入息能多领33元。 一次性调高或需累进元素 本地年长员工的公积金缴交率曾于1988年、1993年和1999年,在面对金融危机时进行下调,确保他们在经济萧条时段能够保住工作。缴交率虽然在之后有所恢复,但是55岁之后的缴交率仍然不如年轻员工。 目前55岁以下员工的公积金缴交率为月薪的37巴仙,雇主17巴仙及雇员20巴仙;55岁到60属于的缴交率为26巴仙,雇主和雇员各13巴仙;60岁到65岁为16.5巴仙,雇主9巴仙和雇员7.5巴仙;以及65岁及以上的缴交率为12.5巴仙,雇主7.5巴仙而雇员5巴仙。…

狮城罗氏堂兄弟旗下公司 疑现未授权签名警关注

日前因有意收购纽卡斯尔引争议的富豪罗氏堂兄弟又陷风波,被指公司旗下的一家医疗集团的财务报表,出现未经授权的签名。 根据《法新社》报道,安永会计师事务所(Ernst & Young)发表声明澄清,其事务所不曾为医疗集团Novena Global Healthcare Group进行审计工作,也不曾为该集团签署任何文件。 目前新加坡警察已证实接获报案,正密切关注此案。 根据Novena Global Lifecare的官方网站显示,其联合创办人为日前陷入伪照风波的罗氏堂兄弟。 本社报道,贝拉格夫维新集团(Bellagraph…

Action for AIDS President points that 377A is homophobic, dissuades at-risk individuals from seeking HIV treatment and screening

Recently, the non-profit organisation Action for AIDS came out in support of…

NSP’s appeal to President on permit for party newsletter rejected

The National Solidarity Party’s (NSP) appeal to the President against the refusal by…