sllw

In yet another diatribe against the opposition Workers’ Party (WP) Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC), a Government minister has repeated its accusations against the latter.

In a letter to the Straits Times Forum page on Saturday, 13 June, Mr Lawrence Wong, who signed off his letter in his capacity as the Minister for Culture, Community and Youth and the Second Minister for Communications and Information, alleged that AHPETC is guilty of various wrongdoings.

These accusations, however, have been addressed by AHPETC at various points in time, including at a specially-convened two-day Parliamentary sitting in February this year, following the release of the Auditor-General’s report.

Nonetheless, the People’s Action Party (PAP) Government, through its ministers, has lately surfaced another allegation, this time particularly against Ms Sylvia Lim, the chairman of AHPETC and the WP.

She is being accused of “lying” to Parliament about the transfer of Sinking Funds which all town councils are required by law to perform.

Mr Wong’s letter in the Straits Times was in response to Ms Lim’s press release on 5 June, where she refuted the points made by Mr Wong in another article for the Straits Times on the same day. (See here.)

Mr Wong’s follow-up on Saturday was in response to this letter by Ms Lim, and he regurgitated the same issues, among which was this:

“First, the letter blandly asserts that AHPETC had done the necessary transfers to the sinking fund up to financial year (FY) 13/14.

“This is precisely what the court took issue with: That Ms Lim had claimed in Parliament that AHPETC had made sinking fund payments for FY14/15, when, in fact, payments were outstanding.”

Mr Wong’s earlier article had also accused Ms Lim of having “effectively lied” in Parliament.

This seems to be what Law Minister, K Shanmugam, was referring to as well, when he commented on the judge’s decision on the application by the Ministry of National Development for the courts to appoint independent accountants to oversee the use of government grants to AHPETC.

“He said that the chairman of the WP misled Parliament,” Mr Shanmugam said, referring to justice Quentin Loh. “It is very serious to lie in Parliament.”

The allegations that Ms Lim had lied came about after Ms Lim submitted her affidavits in April to the courts for the hearing into the aforesaid MND’s application.

In it, Ms Lim said that AHPETC had made two quarterly transfers into its Sinking Fund, instead of four transfers, for the Financial Year 2014/15.

This runs counter to what Ms Lim had told Parliament in February, the ministers apparently are claiming.

Nonetheless, AHPETC has refuted the suggestion that Ms Lim had lied to Parliament.

“Ms Sylvia Lim denies that she lied to Parliament.  Parliament has avenues such as the Committee of Privileges to ensure that MPs’ conduct meets the standards expected.

“Just because AHPETC did not physically transfer monies into Sinking Funds from its Operating Funds does not mean that monies are missing.  Up to Financial Year 13/14, AHPETC has done the necessary transfers.” (“Response to Minister Lawrence Wong’s Opinion Piece”)

But what exactly did Ms Lim say in Parliament which is seemingly so contentious?

Ms Lim was explaining what AHPETC had done up till that point, in terms of its finances.

This is the part of her speech which the ministers seem to be taking issue with:

“The Town Council accepts that it should have transferred the full amounts due to the sinking funds each quarter and should have paid sinking fund expenses directly from the sinking fund accounts. We have taken steps and made good the transfers. For FY2011 and FY2012, the necessary transfers have been done. We have also done the transfers for FY2013 and have been making transfers for FY2014. As for the errors in transfer amounts flagged by the AGO, we have also made the corrections and payments.” [Emphasis added.]

The relevant part to note is this:

“We have taken steps and made good the transfers…. We …have been making transfers for FY2014.”

Now, let’s look again at what Mr Wong wrote in his Straits Times letter on Saturday:

“… Ms Lim had claimed in Parliament that AHPETC had made sinking fund payments for FY14/15, when, in fact, payments were outstanding.”

First, it is true that AHPETC had made sinking funds payments for FY14/15. This clearly is not in dispute.

Second, Mr Wong’s use of the word “payments” – in plural form – is misleading.

At the time when Ms Lim made these remarks in Parliament (February), AHPETC had only one Sinking Fund transfer outstanding, or due, for FY14/15.

And because the MND has since withheld further provisions of government grants to AHPETC, to the tune of a substantial S$14 million, the latter has been unable to transfer further funds into its Sinking Funds.

So, AHPETC has, in fact, made good on all the transfers into the Sinking Fund – except the last 2 quarters of 2014, as explained above.

As for the allegation that Ms Lim had lied to Parliament, this seems to be a rather pedantic argument over semantics.

As Ms Lim’s remarks in Parliamentary records show, she was explaining that AHPETC was righting some shortcomings highlighted by the AGO report, and that AHPETC “have been making transfers for FY2014”, which is entirely true – AHPETC “have been making transfer” and had, at the time, made two transfers to its Sinking Fund, and would continue to make these transfers if the MND released its grants to the town council.

Unfortunately, the MND had decided to withhold these grants, which has now led to AHPETC being unable to make further transfers to its Sinking Fund.

From Ms Lim’s remarks, it is clear that she was talking about an ongoing endeavour – AHPETC continuing to make transfers at the period of time when she was speaking in Parliament, and presumably that it will continue to do so if MND released the grants to it.

Indeed, in her correspondence with the MND Ms Lim had repeatedly highlighted that AHPETC would not be able to comply with its legal obligations if the MND did not release the grants.

So, it is rather an exaggeration to say that she lied.

And in any case, as the AHPETC had said, the government is free to summon her before a parliamentary Committee of Privileges.

In the meantime, such allegations look like nothing more than a desperate attempt to get at the WP chairman.

While all these accusations are being hurled, residents and Singaporeans wonder why the MND is unable to resolve such matters without having to resort to the courts and using taxpayers’ funds to settle these matters, or indeed having to resort to immature and unproductive politicking and name-calling.

Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

A Messy End to a Poorly Implemented Vision

By Chua Suntong – On 30 September 2012, Minister of Manpower former…

针对国民服役人员军训事故课题 黄永宏下月国会发表部长声明

国会将在下月11日复会,届时国防部长黄永宏将针对近期以来,国民服役人员培训发生事故的课题,发表部长声明。 根据国防部文告,武装部队理事会针对冯伟衷军训事故事件,已在本月25日成立独立调查委员会(COI)。 独立调查委会将由一名法官担任主席,成员包括专科医生顾问、武装部队安全检讨顾问团成员(ERPSS)、工作场所安全与卫生理事会成员以及一名高级军官(战备军人)。 国防部强调,该委会成员中没有国防部或武装部队成员涉及,并拥有绝对权限,对有助查明事故的资料和证人展开调查,以确认事故发生的原因。 该委会也将向国防部提出相关建议,加强培训和操作方面的安全性。 国防部也重申服役人员的安全仍是国防部和武装部队的首要考量。目前武装部队减少了军训的频率和节奏,并评估部队中的安全规范。 28岁的本地艺人、战备军人冯伟衷一等中士,赴纽西兰参加军训因事故重伤身亡。他在1月19日维修一辆国产自走炮时,不幸在炮塔内被后移的炮管后端压伤,被送往医院抢救,惟仍无力回天,于23日晚8时45分逝世。  

Deputy Batam Mayor advises residents not to travel abroad, especially to S’pore

Along with Singapore’s new border restrictions on Indonesian passport holders, Batam authorities…

拨款预算增24巴仙 移民局新柔长堤关卡仍面对人手不足问题

昨日,移民局发文告,解释新柔长堤上周末交通塞爆,主要是发生虚报炸弹事件、汽车抛锚和驾车人士胡乱插队造成。 许多网民也到移民局脸书抱怨,在关卡出入境大排长龙,一些网民指出,移民局并没有开放更多柜台,来疏导缓慢和拥堵的通关情况。 在誌期19日的声明中,移民局则指出上周末因为有驾驶者插队而导致拥堵情况加剧;此外,还有车子抛锚、虚报诈弹事件等。 “移民局官员全天候工作,尽最大努力确保民众能安全通关。”文告称,由于职员换班和调派人手到交通流量更高的区域,为此有些关卡将暂时关闭。 换言之,移民局默认了一些柜台“因为调派人手到高流量区域”而被迫“暂时关闭”,并没有足够人手来应对上述情况。 移民局预算比去年增加24巴仙 然而,在拨款给移民局的2017和2018预算对比下,可见政府已增加了移民局预算高达24巴仙。在2017年预算,拨款给移民和关卡监控项目的预算是为8亿1789万3800元。 在今年的预算则提升到10亿1416万2300元,增加了1亿9626万8500元: 虽然增加了24巴仙的预算,移民局在面对高峰时期,仍必须暂时关闭部分柜台,“把人手调派到更高交通流量的区域”。 这意味着,即使提升了近两亿元的预算,移民局仍无法有效供应充足的人手和资源,来缓解关卡拥堵的问题。民众有必要质问,移民局如何使用增加的近两亿元拨款?