Amos Yee surrounded by media when he left state court. Photo – Straits Times.

By Community Action Network

We note with alarm, a letter from Amos Yee’s lawyer stating that his client was recently placed on suicide watch while in remand. According to the letter, Amos was strapped down for one-and-a-half days, and kept in a room along with two other persons of unsound mind. He was also denied access to toilet facilities and had to relieve himself in a bottle next to his bed. It is unclear if Amos was given any counseling for harbouring suicidal thoughts.

Amos has been found guilty of wounding religious feelings and of distributing material deemed obscene by the court. He has declined probation and is asking instead for either a fine or a prison term. The judge has however ordered that he be placed in remand while the State assesses his suitability for reformative training.

CAN believes that sending Amos to a Reformative Training Centre is excessive. Sentences last a minimum of 18 months and are usually reserved for repeat offenders who are prone to gangsterism or drug-related crimes. Amos is guilty of neither. He is not a hardcore criminal, has not displayed any violent tendencies and has never expressed an interest in drugs.

Further, as pointed out by Amos’ lawyer Mr Alfred Dodwell, reformative training was not presented as a possibility during the trial. It would thus be unfair for the judge to impose such a punishment at this stage.

By the time he receives his official sentence, Amos would have already spent 39 days in remand. In contrast, the man found guilty of assaulting him outside the courthouse was only behind bars for 3 weeks. We urge the court to consider sentencing Amos to time already served. We also ask the relevant authorities to look into protocols on how inmates with suicidal tendencies are treated.

Signatories – Shelley Thio, Lynn Lee, Joshua Chiang, Jolovan Wham, Jennifer Teo, Woon Tien Wei, Rachel Zeng, Roy Ngerng and Martyn See.

Subscribe
Notify of
38 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Is the Employment Act sufficient to protect people living with HIV from discrimination?

With the recent revelation that the personal information of 14,200 HIV-positive individuals…

Singapore International Festival of Arts 2017 set to enchant and invigorate participatory experience

The Singapore International Festival of Arts (SIFA) returns for the final year…

要求人力部撤回更正指示 民主党上诉遭高庭驳回

人力部援引《防假消息法》,对民主党的贴文发出更正指示。后者在上月上诉高庭,不过高庭已裁决驳回民主党要求撤回指示的申请。 这也是本地首宗在《防假消息法》下,更正指示申诉者被驳回的案例。 法官洪清福认为民主党被要求更正的统计数据“实则是错误的。” 人力部是在去年12月14日,针对民主党的脸书贴文和文章,发出要求更正指示。人力部反驳,本地PMET的就业率自2015年实则逐步增长;且并没有出现本地PMET裁员增加的趋势。 民主党在上月3日向人力部长杨莉明申请,撤回上述更正指示,不过该部在6日驳回。对此民主党只得上诉高庭,在上月16日聆讯。该党选择自行辩护,宁可把支持者们的善款用在筹备来届选举。 徐顺全:民主党亦引用人力部数据 该党秘书长徐顺全曾指出,实则人力部的数据同样无误,只不过是选择使用不同时期的数据,却反指该党的数据是不对的,即便该党的资料也是来自人力部;也不认为对数据诠释的差异,适合动用《防假消息法》。 不过在判决中,法官认同总检察署观点,即“一般理智人,读到有关文章会诠释为当前(就业)令人担忧的趋势。” 法官也指民主党未挑战数据的准确性,却试图以其他理由对其进行批评,欠缺说服力。他认为民主党应说明其图表涵括的是何时间范畴下的数据。 法官也强调法院的角色是诠释法律,而不是针对特定政策可取性发表评论。 如果对立法的确切范围和轮廓有疑问,则适用法定解释的一般规则。

NUS: S$6 million funding to support graduates' ideas that improve society and the world

On Wednesday (6 May), the National University of Singapore (NUS) announced a…