Mandatory Death Penalty

By Kirsten Han

A workshop session at the first Asian Congress of Death Penalty in Kuala Lumpur agreed on Thursday that the mandatory death penalty could be the low-hanging fruit for the abolitionist movement, and that its removal would be a step towards getting rid of capital punishment.

Professor Chan Wing Cheong, associate professor at the School of Law at the National University of Singapore, said the way the Misuse of Drugs Act and the mandatory death penalty were applied raised many points of concern.

Presumption clauses, for example, make it very difficult for an individual to prove his or her innocence.

“The prosecution can charge a person for trafficking, but they don’t have to prove trafficking. They only have to prove possession,” he said.

The amendments to the death penalty are also very narrow, allowing judges discretion in very specific cases.

Prof Chan Wing Cheong
Prof Chan Wing Cheong

“Even though Singapore has moved slightly in terms of the mandatory sentencing regime, it’s very limited, and there will always be cases that fall beyond the line,” he said, adding that it would be much better to give full discretion to judges.

“Every restriction is a step towards abolition,” said Parvais Jabbar of the Death Penalty Project, which seeks to limit the scope of the death penalty through litigation.

Dr Azmi Sharom, a law professor from the University of Malaya, observed that the mandatory death penalty was not as much of a “political hot potato”, as the Death Penalty Project’s research had found that most Malaysians were not in favour of mandatory capital punishment. It would therefore be easier to first persuade governments to remove the mandatory aspect, before striving to remove capital punishment altogether.

“There is no one step that will work; you’ll have to struggle on many fronts,” said Australian lawyer Julian McMahon, who had represented Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran, who had been executed by firing squad in Indonesia to much controversy.

McMahon urged academics, lawyers and activists to work together to tackle the issue from different angles, and to reach out to the media to educate the public on the death penalty and drug policy, so as to debunk claims about deterrence and the necessity of executions.

Held on the 11 and 12 of June, the Asian Congress of Death Penalty brings together activists, lawyers, parliamentarians and academics to network and discuss pertinent issues related to the abolitionist movements around the world. Organisers say that the event has attracted about 300 participants from 30 countries.

Note: The writer is a founding member of We Believe in Second Chances, a Singapore-based campaign to abolish the death penalty.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TraceTogether-only SafeEntry to be progressively implemented at popular venues across Singapore by end of year

The Smart Nation and Digital Government Office (SNDGO) announced on Tuesday (20…

4.5公顷林地遭清理 裕廊集团总裁:不逃避责任

经初步调查显示,有4. 5公顷的克兰芝林地(约六个足球场大小),于去年12月24日至1月13日之间遭承包商华中环球“错误清理”。对此裕廊集团总裁陈文凯称该集团“不会逃避责任”。 两周前,大自然爱好者Brice Li在脸书发文,分享克兰芝兀兰一片林地,在两年前还一篇青葱,但是今年初却已被清理一大片土地。 上述被划为发展农业食品创新园的林地,位于克兰芝路和克兰芝弄交界处,长有南洋楹(Albizia)和灌木等,生活着约47种鸟类,约占本地总记录的12%。 尽管克兰芝林地不是自然保护区,但仍存在生态价值。2011年,马来西亚铁道公司(KTM)归还这片林地时仍是灌木丛,之后渐渐长出植被。 有25公顷的林地被划为农业食品创新园发展用地。其中11.9公顷已被开发,仍保留13.1公顷的绿地。 贸工部与国家发展部在今日(22日)召开记者会,席上贸工部长陈振声指出,裕廊集团已展开内部调查,以了解旗下职员是否有按照规定和流程工作,并且探讨如何改善与承包商等合作机构的监督流程。 他称,已指示所有涉及参与土地清理项目的相关机构立即进行检查,确保他们的项目监督和执行过程合规有序,以免重蹈覆辙。 至于国家公园局则另外援引野生动物法令与公园与树木法,调查涉事单位是否违法。 陈文凯坦言,裕廊集团在此事件有整体责任,且不会逃避。 国家发展部与市区重建局,曾计划将斜穿这块土地的铁道走廊改道,以保留一整块土地供未来发展。…

Friends, family, and Singapore mourn the death of young actor Aloysius Pang

The announcement of Aloysius Pang’s death triggered an outpouring of grief from…

【选举】吁选民善用选票 毕丹星:让工人党提行动党议员不敢问的问题

“行动党不需要您的选票就可以当政府,但是我们需要您的选票”,因此工人党呼吁选民,用选票换来更具诚意和潜能的政坛新秀。 工人党秘书长毕丹星在昨日(7月2日)通过电视和电台,在竞选演讲中直言,行动党无论如何都会组成下届政府。就算国人曾于2011年表示不满,行动党仍然赢得81个议席,虽然只赢得六成的选票,却无阻它成立政府,因此促请民众成为负责任的选民,善用手中一票,投的有价值。 “我们需要您的选票。” 他提醒道,在冠状病毒19疫情的侵袭下,行动党很有可能会赢得所有席位,而不管行动党说了什么,其实它并不需要所有的议席就能授权了,因此希望民众善用选票。 他认为民众应将票投给工人党,因为他们会提出行动党议员所不愿或无法触及的问题,包括之前的服务税(GST)试跑、吉宝岸外与海事涉贪案以及总统大选的修宪案等。该党将重点关注国家治理政策和国人财务负担课题,通过监督,确保政府负责任,提醒政府不要逃避或忘记人民生计课题。 毕丹星指出,给予工人党票选,能够让有能力和真诚的候选新人在未来选举中脱颖而出,这些新人们都需要民众的支持和鼓励。 “让理性、负责任和有礼的工人党候选人进入国会,有助于维护国家,因为我国需要避免一党专制的国会,由少数人来控制国家的一切。” 他补充,该党的长远理念是要让新加坡成为一个健康的民主国家,由两三个政党组成一个有能力和城市的政府。 他指出,“若让错误的人在达到最高职位后,显露自己的本性,那么我国就完蛋了”,因此能为国人提供真正保障的,就是强大且不偏于任何政党的政治、经济、公民和社区机构。