splash1

A video of their dives has gone viral and attracted more than 1.2 million views so far, prompting the Philippines sports authorities to demand explanations from their coach.

Filipino divers John David Pahoyo and John Elmerson Fabriga bombed so badly in their 3-metre springboard diving finals during the SEA Games competition on Thursday that they have become the butt of jokes worldwide, with some describing them as the “Splash Brothers”.

Photo: SGAG Facebook page
Photo: SGAG Facebook page

Fabriga was the first to take the dive, but appeared to have slipped on the board, tumbling in the air and hitting the water with his back.

He was later followed by Pahoyo who crashed awkwardly into the water feet first.

Both scored zero points for their effort, and ended with 7th and 8th place. Malaysia took the gold, while Indonesia and Singapore won the silver and bronze medals respectively.

A video of the dives by the Filipinos was then posted online and almost immediately went viral, with many making fun of the divers.

But it was no laughing matter to the Philippines authorities, where its Sport Commission chairman, Richie Garcia, is reportedly seeking an explanation from Mark Joseph, who heads the country’s Aquatic Sports Association.

“I will give the opportunity for the Philippine Swimming Inc. president to explain because he fought for these divers to come here and compete,” Garcia was reported to have said to the Philippine media.

“I saw these boys train at Rizal Memorial and they are good.”

Mr Joseph, however, laid the blame on the lack of support for the sport.

“They’re new, they’re young they’re fist-timers at this level, so don’t expect fireworks… we only have one training center,” he said.

“But with their performances, I am not surprised, I am not surprised. The amount of money that is spent in our sports is nothing compared to our kalaban [competitors]. It’s that simple,” he added.

“We always like it to be better, but maybe it should teach a lesson to everybody that if you don’t invest … don’t expect,” he said. “It takes years and years to make a champion.”

“The reality is we are really left behind. Look at the Rizal Memorial (Sports Complex) compared to what you see here (in Singapore),” he added.

On some comments which said if the divers were not up to par they should not have been sent to compete in such a big event, Mr Joseph had this to say:

“Because if you don’t compete, you’ll never know (how far behind you are). The point is to participate, whether you win or lose. You fight. What are we gonna do, not show up?”

As for the two divers themselves, they seem to have taken the whole furore in their stride.

Mr Pahoyo, however, revealed that perhaps they didn’t have much time to prepare for their event.

Posting a video compilation of their dives in the synchronised diving events on his Facebook page on Tuesday, he said the pair had only 4 days to train for them.

Still, he thanked their coach for the “endless support and immeasurable love” in helping them prepare for the competition.

Mr Pahayo also asked why people were only interested in their failed dives and not the ones where they did well.

“Why share our failed dives, when you can share the dives that we did well?” he posted along with the video compilation.

“I am still proud because not all of us have the privilege to represent our own country [in a] big sporting event like this,” he wrote.

“Can you still smile after getting embarrassed in front of thousands of people?”

Many Filipinos also expressed support for the duo’s effort in representing their country.

“It’s not about winning, it’s about what you did and your sportsmanship that counts,” commenter Jo Jo Dakay posted.

“No matter what other people think… You kids did an awesome job,” said Mimaw Cruz. “Keep on striving, keep on aiming for better goals.. Don’t let them pull you down… Be proud!”

Fabriga and Pahoyo, however, were not the only divers to fail at the ongoing Games.

Several competitors in the women’s 10m platform chose to dive from 7.5m or even 5m, and many also landed awkwardly.

Here is the video of the awkward dives:

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【读者来函】外国病患来狮城求医或成趋势 建议政府外包医疗技术

我国医学水平在武汉冠状病毒(Covid-19)爆发后再次获得世界承认,同时也吸引了其他国家患者到我过来求医,引起了我国民众的关注,甚至询问道,我国除了收费,是否有准备其他的措施。网友同时建议了将检测冠毒的技术向外承包,或许可以改善目前的状况,和减少未来的忧虑。 署名Beacon的网友来函举例,第152例病患是一名65岁的印度尼西亚籍男子,3月2日在印尼雅加达一家医院就医,五天后就选择前来新加坡,结果3月8日在新确诊。“这病例似乎预示了,本区域的患者,就算不是全球,也可能会因为我国尚没有出现死亡病例,并且拥有高标准和高品质的医疗基础设施,而选择到我国来求医。” “我认为这样的发展,对我国的防疫体制可能造成压力。” 若疫情剧增,恐对防疫体制构成压力 Beacon指出,问题不是在于来求医者是否需要付费,事实上,有能力负担、且愿意寻求治疗的外国人不在少数。 “我们已经目睹一些国家,因为冠毒的突发性爆发且病患遽增,出现医疗体系超负荷甚至崩溃的情况。因此即使他们并不贫穷,却不一定获得治疗。” 网友指出,若我国没有在这个时候做出应对措施,那么不久之后,国民可能就必须和外国人竞争有限的隔离病房和医疗器材,且可能不仅限于政府医院,就连隔离房和急症室比政府医院少的私人医院也会被牵连。 “若真如此,整个国家社会都会感受到竞争影响,尤其是当我国的社区传染病例越来越普遍时。” 网友促请政府尽快在大批求医的患者涌入我国之前,尤其是在社区传染后确诊病例日渐增加的目前,制定公平、透明的政策。“我知道给予有许多其他的相关问题需要解决,以便让随之产生的政策得以确实有效实施,政府需要做出艰难的决定。” 然而他认为,现在是时候让政客和官僚们分享他们的远见,以便能够周到且全面地紧急解决这个问题,避免发生混乱,毕竟冠毒虽然不是大流行病,但是也可能持续到2020年下半旬。 影响健康游客和出差国人 Beacon也提醒到,别忘了,我国医疗吸引冠毒病患前来求医,也间接影响了健康旅客来新的决定,毕竟要和冠毒患者同乘一架飞机还是有被感染的风险。…

日行一善理事会办”友善嘉年华“活动

新加坡日行一善理事会(SKM)于周六(25日)举办家庭合家适宜的“友善嘉年华”(Kindness Carnival),旨在宣导友善文化,透过具教育性与趣味活动,积极营造新加坡友善空间。 该活动位于周六(25日)在道路安全社区公园举办,设计了不同有趣活动如充气城堡、跳飞机等游戏,让孩童能够参与。另外,也有脚踏车骑士志愿者于东海岸公园骑乘SGBike,边骑边向路人献上太阳花,借此提高路人对活动的关注。 新加坡日行一善理事会首次将宣导内容与各种趣味游戏结合,希望能借此提高公民的道路安全意识。 文化、社區及青年部長傅海燕也受邀出席活动。她表示,办理类似友善活动有助于创造我国更友善包容的社会,但她也希望友善文化不要仅限于活动中,更多的是将友善文化融入到社会当中,将新加坡朔造为包容和谐的环境。 此外,日行一善理事会也邀请本地艺人李南星与宋怡霏担任Voices of Loving Kindness (VoLKs)的宣传大使。他们均希望透过艺人的影响力,将道路友善行为潜移默化到人民心中。 “我非常荣幸能成为VoLKs今年的宣传大使。身为艺人的同时,我也兼具驾驶者的身份,我希望道路使用者们能够以更耐心与理解的态度行驶在道路上,也希望透过社交媒体的力量,将此新年传达出去。” 宋怡霏表示。…

Lifestyle blogger warned to remove blogpost after raising awareness about misrepresenting company

By Tiffany Gwee Earlier this month, Singapore-based business and lifestyle blogger Ms.…

申请法援挑战政府假消息裁定 人权律师质疑可行度

政府将在下月于国会寻求通过《防止网络假消息和网络操纵法案》。然而该法被指赋予部长过多的权力、制衡机制不足,也引起公民社会的质疑和忧虑。 在上周四(4月3日)律政部兼卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉出席管理大学对话会。针对一名与会者质疑若假消息来自政府又如何处置,对此他打包票指出,政府并不会凌驾于法律体系之外,完全不受到监督。 反假消息法也被指透过法律刑责,来制造寒蝉效应,造成民众因担忧招惹官司而被高昂诉讼费缠身,而不敢再批评政府政策。 对于官司费的担忧,唐振辉认为,目前国内已有充足的经济和法律援助供有需要者申请,对部长的更正指示作出上诉。 不过,人权律师M拉维就在脸书发文,质疑上述申请法律援助来上诉的实际可行性。 “老实说,我不曾听闻有人申请法律援助来挑战政府的决定。就算可以,还有大部分人都不符合申请法律援助条件,没办法这么做。” 在新起草的防假消息法案下,部长若判断某消息为假消息并可能威胁公共利益,就可下达指示要求更正或撤下。 然而,令拉维感到不安的是,假设政府本身,涉及借用官方媒体散播假消息,有关法案却没有明确途径让公民挑战政府。在该法案第61条文下,部长还能发出“免死金牌”给特定人物或机构,比如说,可以发出指示,豁免某部门或官方媒体,不受法案的对付。 他质疑,普通老百姓怎么可能负担得起动辄至少八万元的诉讼费,到高庭去挑战部长对假新闻的裁定有误。 去年担任蓄意散播假消息特选委员会主席的张有福曾指出,若对政府的裁定有不满,应有足够的管道,且上诉过程不会太繁琐。 他在昨日也接受《联合早报》采访,认为尽管新法案赋予部长权利,迅速采取措施以维护国家利益,但高庭可对其决定进行审核,而不是由政府全权定夺。 他同意,应允许不满者尽快做出申诉,而不是让他们耗费数年和上千元庭费来打官司。“既然部长有权迅速介入,要求个人或网络平台更正或撤下信息,那另一方上诉时也理应获得加速审理,以确保公平。”…