Robiah [Photo: The New Paper]
Robiah [Photo: The New Paper]
Robiah [Photo: The New Paper]
Robiah Lia Caniago.

Does that name mean anything to you? Probably not.

Robiah, 40, is an Indonesian woman, who is married to a Singaporean man. They have two children together – a son, nine-years old, and a daughter, seven.

When her husband was jailed in 2012 for drug offences, Robiah had to find a way to feed her children and herself.

So, she decided to make curry puffs from her two-room rental flat in Lengkok Bahru to sell to nasi padang stalls, The New Paper reported on Monday.

Her puffs were apparently so good that in October 2013, a man she had recently met offered to go into business with her.

“He bought cooking pots and pans for her kitchen,” The New Paper said.

Soon, she was doubling her production of the puffs, selling not only to the nasi padang stalls but also to private customers.

But perhaps of the popularity of her curry puffs, the Housing and Development Board (HDB) came to know about it.

Eventually, the authorities fined her S$3,000 last Wednesday.

Unable to pay the fine, Robiah was sent to jail for five days.

Her relatives had to care for her children while she was incarcerated.

She was released early yesterday morning.

You can read The New Paper’s report here: “She ran 2-room flat curry puff ‘factory’”.

So, what do Singaporeans think about it?

Well, from what can be gleaned online, many are sympathetic of what she did – that while she may have contravened the law, she was nonetheless trying to feed her children while her husband was in jail.

On The New Paper’s Facebook page itself, the comments mostly criticised the authorities for bringing the legal action against Robiah.

R1

R3

And this one from Allan Tan:

R2

The support for Robiah has also spilled over to the SGAG Facebook page, where the page’s admin posted:

SGAG1

 

And some who commented said:

SGAG2

And at least two bloggers have written to support Robiah.

Over at the “Singapore Beacon” blog, the writer says, “The NEA should have some compassion in just issuing her with a warning rather than taking her to court. As a result she was fined $3,000.”

The blogger added, “It was not like she tried to sell off her children in order to make ends meet.”

Another blogger, Alvinology, said, “She did not steal, nor did she harm anyone directly.”

“Here’s someone who would work hard to earn her own living rather than leech off public assistance; but sadly, she broke the law doing so,” the blogger said.

“By Singapore’s law, she is definitely in the wrong for running an illegal kitchen, evading taxes as well as food and safety inspections to ensure hygiene.

“Morally, if she kept her kitchen and operations clean, there is not much harm done to society. After all, she is earning an ‘honest’ living.

“You know those grandmothers and aunties who make pineapple tarts and other goodies at home to sell during the Chinese New Year festive period? What Caniago did is the same as what they do, except that they are not caught.”

What can we do to help Robiah and her children?

Alvinology suggests this: “Savvy businessmen who read about this news report may want to invest to set up shop with her. If she was to move back to Indonesia, her two children will be estranged from their mother.”

Let’s hope the authorities will have mercy on the poor woman who was just trying to feed her children and perhaps help her find a more sustainable – and legal – way to do so.

The above article was first published on Public Opinion.

Subscribe
Notify of
28 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

”吹哨人“李文亮医生调查报告出炉 两名涉案警官受行政警告处分

武汉市中心医院眼科医生李文亮,曾因率先揭露疫情,而被当地警方训诫,随后被称为“吹哨人”。 但因后来确诊武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19),虽然积极接受治疗,却也不敌病魔,于2月6日不幸离世。 在李文亮医生死后也随即引起网民的愤怒与悲恸,中国与成立国家检查委员会,于今年2月初对此展开调查,经过多日调查后,在本周四公布结果。 该报告名为《关于群众反映的涉及李文亮医生有关情况调查的通报》,其内容分为四点: 第一、重述李文亮在微信发布疫情消息的情况;第二、李文亮在接受谈话及训诫的过程;第三、李文亮在感染冠状病毒后的就医情况;第四、李文亮在去世后的抚恤金和善后措施。 最后调查委员也承认警方的训诫不当,执法程序不规范,并建议当局对此事进行监督纠正。同时也督促公安机关即时撤销训诫书,追究相关人员的责任,并向社会公布处理结果。 对此,武汉市公安局也在官方微博上回应,对李文亮训诫一事,其副所长杨力与民警胡桂芳出现执法程序不规范,违规出具训诫书,将给予其行政警告处分。   然而,此次调查结果无法给予满意的答案,有人认为这只是将结果推给奉命行事的基层人员。 亦有网民认为,不仅应该有更高级别官员承担责任,基层警员也同样负有责任,而且他们的责任应超出“记过”和“警告”级别。 而早前为李文亮发声的北京人权律师程海也接受《自由亚洲电台》访问,他认为,此次的调查结果有“微小的积极意义,却仍缺乏重要的行动。” 程海说,“只是轻描淡写地说了一下训诫不适当,没有说训诫的违法性。训诫撤销后,法律上来讲,李文亮的行为有了合法性,对他的处分是没有法律和事实依据的,治安管理法就没有训诫这一条。李文亮的行为没有危害社会,这部分没有肯定。责任人员也没有点名。”

Old newspaper articles disappearing from NLB’s NewspaperSG archives

Yet another which vanished is this, where Dr Tony Tan as Education Minister…

NUS and SFA investigate latest gastroenteritis incident in student residence, suspends food stall

The National University of Singapore (NUS) and the Singapore Food Agency (SFA)…

同在一个巨大“城市甘榜” 林志蔚冀邻里共同打造更好环境

”可能对于一个有小孩的家庭,小孩欢乐的脚步声意味着家庭和谐,但同时也可能造成另一方的困扰,甚至因此工作会议被打断。” 林志蔚今日(15日)在脸书上分享,走访盛港安谷社区,也同样会遇到面对居民反映噪音问题,他坦言,通常这类议题涉及两户家庭,当他们接收到有关噪音问题时,首先会将此事提交到市镇会或建屋局,由他们跟进,到家拜访。 此外,当问题无法得到解决时,他们将会由社区调解中心进行调解。如果问题仍无法解决,则会上报到纠纷仲裁庭(Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals)解决邻里纠纷。 “以我的经验而言,这些都提供了一些成功解决纠纷的可能性,但同时也需要很大程度的同理心,双方也需认识到在共享空间内生活会面临的自然挑战。” 他坦言,噪音干扰是普遍会受到的居民投诉之一。他再举例,如楼上无法避免的家具声响,却对楼下有特殊需要的孩子而言,就是一种困扰,很可能因敏感的噪音让他无法理解,并无法安静待在餐桌上安静吃饭。 林志蔚也在文末呼吁居民共同守好邻居之责,尤其是在共同生活在一个巨大“城市甘榜”,只有互相体谅才能让生活环境更好。