Ucare_fund

The National Trade Union Congress (NTUC) is revising its criteria for those who would qualify for its assistance schemes.

With the revision, it is expected that 11,000 more low-income families will benefit, the labour movement said on Sunday. This is in addition to the existing 50,000 recipients last year which benefited from the schemes.

Under the NTUC’s U-Care programme, which was established in 2009 “to consolidate the Labour Movement’s fundraising efforts to better the welfare of our low-income members and their families”, union members can receive up to S$100 worth of vouchers for their daily necessities.

And with its U-Care Back to School vouchers programme, members can also apply to receive vouchers worth S$125 for their children’s school expenses.

However, to qualify for these schemes, members with dependants in the same household must have a monthly gross household income of S$2,800 or below.

This amount will be increased to S$3,000.

“The criteria have always been reviewed regularly and this is one of our regular reviews,” said NTUC Secretary-General Chan Chun Sing.

Business Times, 2012
Business Times, 2012

“So every year we look at the basket of goods, the cost of living, the kind of expenses that our members have and then, as and when necessary, we will revise it. And it also depends on the funds that we are able to raise for the families in need.”

This year, the NTUC aims to raise S$10.5 million for the U-Care Fund, through various activities including four Family Recreation & Fun Carnivals which will be held throughout the year.

With a expected 61,000 recipients this year, each beneficiary would received some S$172.00.

Since its inception in 2009, the NTUC itself has also contributed to the U-Care Fund directly.

In 2009, it gave S$1.16 million to the fund, followed by S$1 million each in the next two subsequent years of 2010 and 2011.

This amount, however, has since been halved to S$500,000 each in 2012 and 2013, according to NTUC’s Income’s Financial Statements.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

30年来首次 港警以防疫为由反对维园六四晚会

香港原定6月4日,在维多利亚公园举行的六四烛光晚会,主办方支联会收到香港警务处“禁止公众会通知”。这是30年来来,六四晚会首次遭警方反对。 据香港媒体报导,警察发出的反对通知书称,有理由相信举办有关活动,会增加活动参与者及其他市民感染病毒的风险,亦可能市民的生命健康构成重大威胁,“危害公共安全及影响他人的权利”。 警察又指,合理地相信纵然对集会施加相关条件,亦无助于维护公共秩序,公共安全及保护他人的权利和自由,因此决定禁止集会。 “香港市民支援爱国民主运动联合会”(简称支联会),该会主席李卓人,昨日就表示,对警方允许集会感到不乐观,支联会已准备替代方案。 若警方不允许今年的六四晚会,该会呼吁港民在当日晚上8时,在任何地方,参与六四悼念,点燃蜡烛。并同时在09分默哀一分钟。

Singapore should reconsider accepting the legality of prenuptial agreements

~by: Ghui~ China-born singer Zhang MiaoYu has no qualms about telling you…

高庭驳回梁实轩反诉总理滥用程序申请

本地时评人梁实轩被总理李显龙提告诽谤,对此梁早前提出上诉反告总理滥用司法程序。不过高庭作出裁决驳回梁实轩的反诉,指后者“没有合理的诉讼理由”。 法官Aedit Abdullah,在昨日(12日)针对上述反诉作出裁决时,引述2018年Lee Tat发展公司提告301号分层地契管理公司的上诉庭判决先例,驳回以滥用程序为诉讼理由。 这是根据总理针对梁实轩反诉,在1月9日作出的辩词,指梁的反诉“既没有法律依据,也没胜诉希望”。 法官认为,“合理诉讼理由”,是有关上诉受理时,有些胜诉机会。故此驳回梁实轩的反诉总理申请。 法官引述Lee Tat发展公司诉讼案例,认为如果允许梁实轩反诉总理滥用程序,可能导致: 破坏“法律终局性原则”(树立司法权威性),助长不必要且冗长的小型诉讼 大开诉讼闸门 产生寒蝉效应 法官Aedit也阐释Lee…

因室友确诊20客工反锁房内? 经理:临时安全措施

因同室客工冠状病毒检测呈阳性,其余同房客工就被反锁在房内,有关宿舍经理对此表示,他这么做是别无选择,因为该客工宿舍还有其余约800名客工。 昨日(21日)客工权益组织“客工亦重”(Transient Workers Count Too,简称TWC2)在脸书上贴文,指受到来自大士10巷Joylicious宿舍客工的求救电话,指其中一名室友被确诊感染冠毒后,他和20名客工就被锁在房间内。 针对此事,《今日报》联络了该宿舍经理Thng(35岁)以了解事情详情时,经理表示他这么做是为了安全起见,“我还要照顾800个客工,他们还有800个家庭要交代。(我们不能)为了一个人酿成大错(导致疫情传染失控)” 。 将客工搬迁至更大房间 他指出,事实上并没有将客工锁在房中24小时,因为他们当时需要时间,为被反锁的客工们准备一间有厕所设施的房间,而之前的房间并没有厕所。 他也澄清,受困的客工只有20名。 “客工亦重”在昨日下午5时更新帖文时指出,被锁客工已搬迁到较大且有配置厕所的房间,但是仍然被反锁着,甚至附上了显示门锁被上锁的房门照片。 然而客工雇主V…