(Image, Mark Cheong, The Straits Times)
ST PHOTO: MARK CHEONG
ST PHOTO: MARK CHEONG

The Singapore Police Force updated its statement on facts surrounding fatal shooting of a driver who broke through a police checkpoint, which was in place due to the high-security event.

The dash through incident was reported at 4.36am on 31 May 2015 in the vicinity of Shangri-La Hotel, where the Shangri-La Dialogue was held.

The driver, Mohamed Taufik Bin Zahar, 34 was shot dead after police started shooting at the vehicle he was driving when he suddenly accelerated the vehicle towards the police officers, in the direction of Shangri-La Hotel.

The two passengers, Mohamed bin Ismail, 31 and Muhammad Syahid bin Mohamed Yasin, 26 were arrested in relation to this incident. All three men are Singaporean.

scene where the incident took place

The police said that the trio was earlier stopped at a security checkpoint set up along Ardmore Park.

SPF added that the police officers responded swiftly to prevent the vehicle from approaching Shangri-la Hotel when the said vehicle crashed through the concrete barricades.

It is said that police fired at the vehicle to stop it from causing harm to others and to move forward as the car continued to drive dangerously across the security checkpoint towards the hotel despite repeated warnings to stop.

The driver was pronounced dead at the scene while the two passengers were arrested. Mohamed bin Ismail sustained injuries during the incident and was conveyed to hospital conscious.

The police said that substances believed to be controlled drugs and an item, believed to be a drug-taking utensil, were found on the two men arrested. No weapons were found on the three subjects.

Police and officers from Singapore Armed Forces’ (SAF) Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Explosives Defence Group (CBRE DG) searched the Singapore-registered vehicle, a red Subaru Impreza. No explosives, arms or weapons were found in the vehicle. A bag containing white powdery substances believed to contain controlled drugs was recovered in the vehicle.

It is said that the deceased was wanted for failing to attend court for an offence of criminal intimidation and has drug related antecedents as well as other criminal records.

The passenger, Mohamed bin Ismail is also wanted for drug related offences and for failing to stop at a roadblock. Both he and Muhammad Syahid bin Mohamed Yasin have drug related antecedents and criminal records.

Police have also said that investigations are still ongoing.

The two men are being investigated by Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) for drug-related offences and will be charged on 1 June 2015 for a drug trafficking offence under the Misuse of Drugs Act.

The Special Investigation Section of Criminal Investigation Department (CID) is investigating the death of Mohamed Taufik bin Zahar as part of the Coroner’s Inquiry process. All shooting cases are treated seriously and will be thoroughly investigated by the Police.

Preliminary investigations indicate that this is an isolated incident and is not terrorism related.

The police clarified that security measures including vehicle and person checkpoints were put in place in the vicinity of Shangri-La Hotel due to the ongoing Shangri-La Dialogue. The measures taken are standard operating procedures to ensure that all vehicles and persons entering or approaching the secured venues are checked for dangerous weapons and explosives that could be used to harm persons attending a major security event.

Police say that it has developed a calibrated approach to public security to ensure that Singapore remains safe and secure and advised the public to comply with Police’s directions to ensure their safety and security.

Subscribe
Notify of
29 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Police dismiss claims of racism following incident at Bishan MRT Station, netizens on the fence over who was in the wrong

In a Facebook post on Wednesday (10 July), the Singapore Police Force…

A call for a moratorium

In the past several weeks and months, The Online Citizen interviewed various…

请建屋局正视居家改进计划工程素质

政府推行家居改进计划(HIP),为1986年/更早前的组屋进行翻新,政府承担高达95巴仙费用。翻新后有助延长组屋寿命,也汰换家中老旧或不安全的设施,如旧电插头、厕所设备或解决水管漏水等问题。 然而,今日一则新闻令人痛心:两年前,住在武吉巴督东某组屋单位的15岁少年陈耀斌,却因为在沐浴时,热水器漏电而触电身亡。今日验尸官在法院质询,指出热水器不当使用不符高电流的三脚插头,以及断电器故障,导致意外发生。 死者一家的组屋单位在2015年进行居家改进计划,死者母亲想顺便更换新热水器。建屋局接洽负责的承包商,后者指派旗下的修电分包商JL工程建筑公司,派人来装热水器。 然而,验尸官发现,尽管负责装热水器的监工和工友修电经验丰富,但没有合格修电执照! 为何请无牌电工为组屋修电? 负责为组屋单位进行家居改进计划的承包商和分包商,为何能容许没有修电执照的监工和工友,负责为公共组屋住户提供服务?建屋发展局对此事难道毫不知情?只要把工作交给承包商和分包商去完成,就算大功告成? 而这名“无牌”监工还有到30座公共组屋修电的经验,也发现有78巴仙的热水器,都是以三脚插头接电的。根据新加坡建设局资料,JL 工程的专项是电子工程,但何以负责重要的组屋工程,属下监工和工友都没有合格修电执照?建屋局是否应该着手管制,规范化这种外包承包商参差不齐的素质? 触电事故肇因很多,除了住户本身需提升用电安全意识,也要常检查家中电器是否正常运作。负责调查此事的验尸官在庭上也指出,无论如何,不管是承包商、在场监工和工人,如果发现住户家中有潜在用电威胁,都有责任通知住户,请他们更换,避免不幸事故再度发生。 据报导,质询过程中,分包商总监提到建屋局有指示翻新组屋单位后,也要把原有电器配设恢复原状。吊诡的是,负责修电的监工经验丰富,也坦承发现住户家中使用三脚插头通电热水器不安全,没及时提醒住户(理由是没和死者家属碰到面),而且还是同样以三脚插头接到新安装的热水器。 结果一年后,不幸事故发生在年仅15岁的少年身上。验尸官卡马拉揭露,调查期间,发现插头里中性线(neutral)和地线衔接松弛,中心线和地线甚至已经溶焦在一起。地线连接到热水器外壳,是和金属莲蓬头相连的。通过死者身体的电流估计达0.95A,带来致命电击。与此同时,故障的断路器无法及时断开电流。死者家人后来关掉电源,紧急送往医院抢救,惟已回天乏术。 组屋工程失误时有发生…