ASEAN people's forum

By Vanessa Ho, Project X

The annual ASEAN People’s Forum/ ASEAN Civil Society Conference took place from the 21st to 24th of April 2015 in Kuala Lumpur. It is a conference that aims to bring together civil society groups and activists from all around the region to discuss key human rights issues that people face.

The theme for this year is “Reclaiming ASEAN for the People”—in an effort to remind Heads of States that ASEAN should not be an “elite club” but one that truly and sincerely has the interests of the people at heart. The full statement crafted by civil society organizations can be accessed here.

As was evident throughout the conference, “reclaiming ASEAN for the people” remains a pipe dream—for now. During one of the plenaries titled “How to Make the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC)[1] People-Responsive”, panellists discussed the agenda of the 2015 ASEAN Economic Community blueprint and how it would or would not benefit the people. Anthony Tujan (IBON Philippines) set the stage by delineating how there are two ASEANs—one for the rich and one for the people[2]. As such, Tujan asks—to whom does the agenda of the AEC belong to?

The second speaker Dr Munir Majid (Chair of ASEAN Business Council) concludes that because the people were not consulted in the process of drawing up the blueprint, there isn’t a sense of ownership. He argues that despite that, the AEC has its benefits for the people. Eni Lestari (International Migrants Alliance, Indonesia), followed by arguing that domestic workers among many other marginalized communities still face many forms of human rights violations that are not addressed by the agenda of the AEC.

Dr Seree Nonthasoot (AICHR Thailand) ended the panel by arguing that the way forward is to mainstream cross-cutting issues such as human rights and environmental sustainability across the three (separate and often non-collaborative) pillars of ASEAN—the Economic, Socio-Cultural, and Political-Security pillars.

DSC01782

Throughout the conference, workshops were divided into four broad themes: development justice; democratic processes, governance, and fundamental rights and freedoms; peace and security and discrimination and inequality.

Participating organizations included Amnesty International, the ASEAN SOGIE Caucus, Open Society Foundations, Forum Asia, International Women’s Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific (IWRAW-AP), WITNESS and so on. Project X decided to attend the conference in order to learn more about ASEAN, human rights in ASEAN, and to also represent sex worker issues at the conference.

Associate Program Coordinator Lisa said that, “I felt it was a good exposure for me to gain knowledge and understanding of the main problems that others in Southeast Asian countries are facing. Basically my understanding is that most of the countries in the region are voicing out their right to freedom of speech and expression, claiming the right of decent work and salary, cutting down on the high cost of living in each country, etc.”

Unfortunately, the team members felt that Singapore was highly underrepresented at the conference.

Youth Programme Coordinator Sherry commented, “I agree [that Singapore is a developed country and that we have to recognize our privilege]. But that is what is seen and heard by the citizens of Singapore who enjoy the privilege of being a Singaporean.Behind the good, clean and impressive image others have about Singapore, there are still people who are struggling and being discriminated. LGBT, and in particular most transgender people, face unfairness in employment. This results in us holding odd jobs. And those who are financially unstable, result in low education and in the future that means they will be paid low wages. What good seen outside, does not reflect the inside. Take a closer look, don’t just glimpse.”

pic 1

The conference ended with an ASEAN Walk. While street demonstrations and marches in Singapore are largely illegal, it is a very empowering activity. Even though the team was initially hesitant at participating in the march—somewhat due to the police presence at the event – we eventually embraced the opportunity.

Youth Programme Coordinator Maya said, “At the walk I felt so blessed. We were marching and all of us that marched belong to a marginalised community. We shouted and roared to everyone the issues that we are suffering. Somehow to me, it is very empowering. I felt like I’m doing something to make a difference in the community—to help and be the voice of the marginalised community!”

Lisa similarly shared that, “I value the opportunity to see and feel how united every participant is in trying to make changes for their human rights in their respective countries.”

On attending the conference as well as the march, Sherry said, “It was very empowering to see 10 countries gathering to seek knowledge and words of wisdom from respective workshops. One for example: seek justice for Mary Jane. I find it very united of the fellow citizen to gather and seek justice not only for her, but for all migrant domestic workers. We all know and can relate the pain and sadness working across the border far apart from family, not having anyone close to share anything with. And as for me, I joined the SOGIE[3] contingent. It’s basically what I’m fighting for now here in Singapore, the only difference is that I now know more about what other LGBTIQ people from other countries face.”

DSC01771

[1] The AEC is a blueprint that aims to achieve regional economic integration. It envisions the following key characteristics: (a) a single market and production base, (b) a highly competitive economic region, (c) a region of equitable economic development, and (d) a region fully integrated into the global economy.
[2] While poverty rates have decreased since the 90’s, income inequality continues to plague the region. As of 2013, there are 83 billionaires in 6 ASEAN countries—even one in Viet Nam. In the Philippines, which has one of the highest inequality in the world, there are 17 billionaires. This is exacerbated by problems such as land grabbing and various environmental challenges.
[3] SOGIE stands for sexual orientation, gender identity and expression.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Supporter collects eligibility forms for Chiam See Tong

From Yahoo! Singapore News A supporter of former Opposition Member of Parliament Chiam…

抄袭王瑞杰? 马国旅游局:我们也有东海岸计划!

还记得提名日(6月30日)当天,临危上阵东海岸集选区的原副总理王瑞杰,似乎还未准备好与选区有关的致辞稿,结果演说只能不断重复“东海岸”,成为选举期间的热门笑料之一。 当时在成功提名后,王瑞杰发表感言,指出:“对于东海岸的居民,我们都有针对东海岸的计划。我们有…东海岸…新加坡…我们都有东海岸的计划。我们关心东海岸。” 不过,不知是否纯属巧合还是存心恶搞,长提对岸的马来西亚旅游局,竟也“抄袭”王瑞杰,在旅游宣传广告中标榜“我们也有东海岸计划”! 在马国旅游局的脸书贴文,也写道:“我们也有东海岸的计划,我们有东海岸-马来西亚。我们都共同有,东海岸计划,我们关心您,马国驻新加坡旅游局”。接着不忘介绍该国东海岸的知名景点,如热浪岛、刁曼岛等等。 不过不仅仅是马来西亚,就连泰国旅游局也要来恶搞!泰国旅游局也借机推广泰国东海岸的景点,例如芭达雅、春武里府、庄他武里等。 不得不重温下王瑞杰的经典演说:

深耕多年的单选区竟被取消! 工人党求解释

选区范围检讨委员会报告出炉,有关报告已在本月11日提呈给总理。委会建议31个选区,其中集选区17个,单选区14个,共93个国会议席。新加坡政府已接受该委会建议,并将在来届选举落实。 工人党对此也发文告,揶揄文告经历七个月后终于出炉,不过即如以往,委会对于他们如何作出这些划分选区的决定,未有提供解说。 尽管单选区从13席增至14,但是工人党指出,委会取消掉盛港西、凤山和榜鹅东等单选区,却未有给予解释,这些选区工人党已活跃多年。 不过随着有关选区划分报告出炉,工人党称终于“水清石出”,故此该党将决定在哪个选区出战能更好地为国人服务,并会在选举召开时公布。 工人党李丽连曾在2013年的榜鹅东补选,以54.52巴仙得票率打败人民行动党的许宝琨医生,夺下该选区。接着在2015年9月大选,仅以3.52巴仙、约1156票之差不敌张有福败选。 至于工人党在上届选举派出陈立峰出战凤山,得票率也有42.50巴仙,而对手陈慧玲57.50巴仙,后者多数票3千241张。

兀兰双尸案 前房屋经纪被判死刑

三年前在位于兀兰的组屋,杀39岁的怀孕妻子和四岁女儿,前房屋经纪藏尸9天,现年45岁的被告张锦兴(译音),两项谋杀罪名成立,在今日(12日)被判处死刑。 法官Kannan Ramesh在考量控辩双方辩词后,作出如上判决,并指出被告在勒死妻子时仍神智清醒,没有精神失常或患有严重抑郁症;法官也指被告将案发时归咎于女儿,是不可想象的。被告很清楚自己在做什么。 法官形容这是家破人亡惨剧,被告闻判时显得冷静,他将对罪成裁决提出上诉。 张锦兴被控在2017年1月20日(大年初一),在兀兰52通道第619座组屋六楼的四房式单位,谋杀怀孕的妻子钟佩珊和四岁的女儿张芷宁,酿成两尸三命惨剧。 尽管过去他曾是一名房地产经纪,月入一度达到1万元至1万5000元,不过在2013年后,房地产业萧条,最后到装修公司上班,领1500元月薪。 他指女儿学费一个月需1000元,单靠他微薄的1500元月薪,是不足以应付家里的开销。被告欠卡债、银行贷款、汽车贷款、女儿学费共约15万元,觉得透不过气。 案发当天早上,被告担心被幼稚园追讨学费,有意不让女儿上学,结果与妻子产生争执。 张锦兴一气之下走进浴室拿出一条毛巾,回到卧室直接用毛巾勒住妻子的脖子,用力拉紧猛掐。约15分钟后,妻子看似没有动静,张锦兴一度松手,但因注意到妻子仍有微弱呼吸,他于是徒手大力掐死她。 当时,女儿在同一间卧房里看电视。张锦兴叫女儿过来坐在他怀里,女儿乖乖照做,身子背对他。张锦兴接着用毛巾大力勒住女儿的脖子。过了一会儿,女儿奄奄一息,张锦兴最后徒手猛掐,直至女儿完全断气。