Yee
Yee
Yee

16-year old blogger Amos Yee explained in court documents that his intention in critiquing Christianity and Lee Kuan Yew is to open discussions on what he saw as “problems” with the faith and Singapore.

The teenager said that he was aware his critique would lead some people to take offence, but that this promoted discussion, which, he added, “was healthy for positive change to take place in future.”

Amos Yee is being charged for remarks he made in a video on the death of the late Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore’s former prime minister.

The authorities say the video “contained remarks against Christianity, with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of Christians in general”.

He is also being charged for a caricature of Mr Lee and the late British prime minister, Margaret Thatcher, which the authorities say is an offence under Singapore’s obscenity laws.

After his video on Mr Lee was uploaded, Amos Yee said there were positive and negative comments from the public, and that he was “pleased that my video had opened up a bigger avenue to look at religion objectively, instead of mere blind faith.”

He said he had concerns about the Christian faith and that the “the only way to rectify the problem is to criticize the problems head-on.”

He explained that while he “was aware that critiquing these problems (with the Christian faith) would promote ill-will”, he saw this as “a natural consequence”, and that “promoting ill-will is a prerogative for positive change to happen in society, especially if the issue at hand were initially controversial.”

The teen said he was born into a Catholic family and was raised a Catholic.

However, in 2013, when he was about to be confirmed as a Catholic (which is a practice in the Church known as “Confirmation”), he “started to question the implications” of it.

He then began to conduct his own research into the faith by watching online videos on Youtube and reading blog posts.

His finding, from these, and other “emotional catalysts” such as being “kicked out” of the altar boys group for swearing, resulted in him disengaging from the Church altogether in 2013, he said.

Earlier this year, he observed that “there was huge outpouring of grief online and in the mainstream media” when Mr Lee passed away.

He said this “piqued” his interest and he decided to conduct more research on Mr Lee. He visited blogger Roy Ngerng’s website, had discussions with supporters of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), and read Mr Lee’s book, “Lee Kuan Yew: The Man And His Ideas”, which he had borrowed from Toa Payoh library.

“After my research, I realised that he was a horrible man and that some of his policies were inane,” Amos Yee said.

Subsequently, he decided to make a video on Mr Lee’s death, in which he also drew comparisons between Mr Lee and Jesus Christ.

Amos Yee said he has been making videos since he was 12-years old.

He had also won two awards – Best Actor and Best Short Film – for one of his films, “Jan”, three years ago in The New Paper’s first film award competition, beating 160 other entries.

In the 8-minute video on Mr Lee, titled “Lee Kuan Yew is finally dead!”, where he spoke some 1,200 words, Amos Yee mentioned “Jesus Christ” once, and “Christian” twice.

Before uploading the video online, he asked two of his friends if the video would be legal, but both gave him inconclusive answers.

He then looked up the Sedition Act to see if his video would contravene the law.

“However, after reading through the Act, I remained unsure as to the legality of my video,” he said in the court documents.

Nonetheless, he said he “was aware that the contents of the video were seditious in nature” but he was unsure if his actions would land him in jail.

He decided to go ahead and upload the video after he saw how others “whose opinions were published online and promoted a lot of ill-will, continued to publish these opinions of theirs and were not charged under the Sedition Act.”

He thus did not think that his actions (in uploading the video online) would be deemed illegal.

After the video became public, the teenager said he noticed that the majority of online comments in reaction to it were “hate-filled messages”.

But he said he expected this “as the content was meant to be controversial.”

There were also, he noted, “a noticeable amount of people who agreed with my views and supported my stance.”

The video has thus far been viewed more than a million times on Youtube.

Amos Yee also revealed in his court documents that he “began receiving death threats and hate messages online and on my mobile phone.”

He said he was “not overly concerned” by these as he felt most of them were baseless and were “not steeped in logic.”

“Besides, despite the hatred and ill-will generated from my video, it opened up a larger avenue for critical discussion towards Lee Kuan Yew, thus raising awareness to the inherent problems of Singapore,” he said.

Amos Yee was assaulted outside the State Court about a week ago as he made his way to a pre-trial conference.

A 49-year old man is reported to have been arrested for the assault since, and police say investigations are ongoing.

As for the caricature of Mr Lee and Mrs Thatcher portrayed in an unflattering manner, Amos Yee said he came up with the image after learning that Mrs Thatcher had once said Mr Lee “was always right.”

The teenager felt that this was an “overgeneralisation” and “too sweeping to be objectively true.”

His intention in making the image was thus to make fun of Mrs Thatcher’s claim, and to encourage more people to “openly criticise and make fun of their political leaders.”

This, he said, “opens up a larger avenue for critical analysis and positive change in Singapore.”

Amos Yee said he refuses to remove any of the videos he has made, or the post about Mr Lee and Mrs Thatcher, “because it would not appease the public”, and also it would suggest that he was sorry for the videos and the blog post, which he is in fact not sorry for.

He explained that he was not remorseful for his actions because while he knows that they are offensive, “that is an aspect for freedom of speech and positive change to occur.”

Amos Yee had ended his video expressing hope that Singapore would see positive changes, especially with a general election expected to be called soon.

“[There] is  high chance that us, citizens of Singapore, things can finally change for the better,” he said in the video. “Let’s all hope for change, for good change, for every possible kind.”

After the hearing on Wednesday, the teenager’s lawyer, Alfred Dodwell, said his client was in good spirits.

“He believes that he’s done nothing wrong, stands by what he says, and this is the very reason why he is in remand, because he refuses to be gagged,” Mr Dodwell said.

The parents of the 16-year old were in court to lend support to their son yesterday, along with friends and supporters of Amos Yee.

The two-day trial, presided by District Judge Jasvendar Kaur, continues on Friday afternoon.

Read also: “Amos Yee pleads not guilty, in good spirits”.

Subscribe
Notify of
193 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

来届选举无法举办群众大会

根据选举局文告,依循卫生部指南,来届选举将无法举办群众大会,而改以线上群众大会。也不会发出警方准证给任何选举聚会。 选举局鼓励政党和候选人,进行不涉及群聚的宣传精选方式,例如网络直播大会等。 政府也在竞选期间提供直播场地,候选人可以选择申请使用。当局称,场地将以补贴价开放候选人使用,用途仅限线上群众大会的直播录制。 至于网络竞选广告,则需符合当局早前公布的条规,例如竞选期开始12小时内,候选人须上网向选举官,申报用来发布竞选广告的平台。如有用新平台,无论付费或非付费,也要申报。广告将需列出刊登广告者,如候选人本身、政党还是经授权的第三方竞选者。 竞选期间的影片,也须遵询影片法令(Films Act)。候选人需事先将影片提交资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA),作评定分级。不过,只在网上发布的影片无需事先提交,内容应符合互联网运作准则。 6月8日,选举局发出两份文告,公布有关网络付费选举广告,以及选民投票的安全措施之修订条规。

Sentosa Gateway Tunnel to be opened on 27 April

Land Transport Authority (LTA) has announced that the Sentosa Gateway Tunnel will…

反击尚穆根含沙射影诋毁 总编分享作业程序亲自指导报导方向

日前,内政部长暨律政部长尚穆根指责,《网络公民》雇用包括马来西亚等外国人,撰写有关新加坡政治的负面文章,包括一些可破坏社会凝聚力的煽动性文章。 对此,他认为国家面对“外部势力干预,政府有必要采取行动应对”。 他更点名其中有两篇文章,由名为“茹巴幸妮”(Rubaashini Shunmuganathan)的马国女子撰写,根据公开信息显示,他住在吉隆坡莎阿南。 他指由茹巴撰写的一篇文章呼吁新加坡公务员仿效香港的同业进行示威;另一文章则涉及诽谤总理(实则只是复述总理弟妹的指控),导致后者提告本社总编。 对此,本社总编许渊臣亦在《网络公民》英语站作出反驳,抨击尚穆根言论不公允、乃至似乎有恶意地含沙射影,诋毁本社信誉。 如果依照《海峡时报》照搬尚穆根的言论、未加查证的报导,让人误以为他所说的文章正是要鼓励本地公务员仿效香港的同业走上街头。 原文旨在呼吁公务员站出来为民发声 对此,许渊臣指出,如果去查看原文,会发现有关文章乃是引述博客的观点,呼吁本地公务员不要盲从执政党的政策,也应该要站出来为民发声。 在那篇文章,鄞义林分享公务员分享一张照片,那是香港公务员的“连侬墙”,张贴便利贴表达他们对警察滥权、反修例问题等的关注。从头到尾,并没有鼓吹公务员仿效暴力示威。 至于尚穆根的疑问“究竟谁操控她(茹巴)、付她薪水?他的目的是什么?”对此,许渊臣直接回答道,正是他自己,他请茹巴为他工作。 他也上载一张照片,清楚展示本社的作业方式。对于有关被指冒犯总理的文章,对于文章导向、如何撰写和角度,都由总编亲自给予指示,茹巴并没有在指示以外添加其他内容,“所以不管他是马来西亚人、新加坡人、印度人等,有差别吗?”…