Yee
Yee

Lawyers for blogger and youtuber Amos Yee will be asking the court to amend the bail conditions for their client.

The 16-year old has been in remand in Changi Prison since 30 April after he breached bail conditions.

Yee’s trial will take place on Thursday and Friday.

Nonetheless, Ervin Tan, one of three laywers representing the teenager, said they “did not wish to see him spend more time in remand than necessary”.

Yee was arrested on 29 March after he posted a video on Youtube which the authorities claimed wounded the feelings of Christians, and that he made “offensive” remarks about the late Lee Kuan Yew.

The second charge, however, has since been stood down by the prosecutor but could be revived at a later date.

A third charge against Yee is for transmitting an obscene image on his blog.

News reports earlier said Yee was charged for sedition but this is inaccurate. Yee, instead, is being charged under the Penal Code, Section 298 and Section 292(1)(a).

Yee was bailed out after his initial arrest but at his pre-trial conference on 30 April, he was ordered to be remanded again after he failed to adhere to the bail terms by posting two articles after he was released.

The bail conditions had required him not to upload or distribute any content online before the completion of his case, and to report to Bedok police station every morning at 9am.

The judge at his pre-trial hearing raised the bail to S$30,000, together with the earlier bail conditions.

Yee, however, felt the conditions were unreasonable and refused to accept the terms. He had thus told his bailor, counsellor Vincent Law, that he would not like to be bailed, although Mr Law was prepared to post bail for Yee again, even under the new terms.

A review of his bail conditions will now be heard on Wednesday.

“We have informed the court from the outset that the bail conditions are too wide and in violation of his constitutional rights to freedom of speech and expression,” Mr Alfred Dodwell, Yee’s lawyer, said.

He said that the gag order imposed on Yee is unnecessary.

“To inform a boy of 16 he cannot use social media is like depriving him of water,” Mr Dodwell said. “Also the reporting to the police daily at 9 am. All of these are uncalled for.”

Mr Dodwell said Yee’s passport has already been impounded and he is thus not a flight risk.

“Even foreigners charged, who are sometimes flight risk are not treated so,” Mr Dodwell explained.  “How can one place a gag order when he has not even been found guilty? So we had to challenge it. We have filed the motion with Amos Yee’s supporting affidavit.”

His lawyers are asking the courts to return the bail amount to the original sum of S$20,000, and for Yee to be allowed to exercise his freedom of speech, and to be able to post anything on any subject on any social media or online services, except commenting on or posting content about his ongoing court case.

The hearing will take place at 11.15am at the High Court.

Subscribe
Notify of
33 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Immigration – A Different Approach

By Ghui – I think it is fair to say that most…

State of emergency declared in Bangkok, Thailand

Thailand has just declared a 60-day state of emergency in Bangkok and…

马人权委会空缺悬空两月才填补 28公民组织要马哈迪解释

28个马来西亚公民组织,对于马国人权委会八名委员职务悬空60天才获填补,感到不满,并促请首相马哈迪对于延迟委任提供合理的解释。 众多维权团体于周三(26日)发出一项联合声明,力促修订《马来西亚人权委员会法令》(SUHAKAM Act),确保有更具独立性的甄选过程,以及延长任期和薪酬,让马来西亚人权委员会能够更具效率与效益。 人权委员由首相甄选 “甄选人权委员的权力有赖于首相一人,由他“建议”人选,而最高元首会听从首相意见委任人权委员。修法是希望未来能够成立独立的甄选委员或过程,而非由首相或元首直接指派”文告表示。 随后,维权团体也促请政府立刻将人权委员会的年度报告和特别报告提呈国会,确保辩论和审议期间的透明度。 “我们,共28团体与组织,对于马来西亚的国际人权会自2019年4月27日来结束后,仍未有成立人权委员组织感到震惊。” 这些参与脸书的团体包括马国反死刑组织MADPET和新加坡反死刑运动。 根据组织联合声明,前朝政府也同样延误了委任委员与团队的工作,分别是58天和38天。 “虽然最终委员会还是成立,但委任工作应早点开始,而元首应立即促成委任工作,这样人权委员会才不会经历没有人权委员的空巢期。”声明表示。 拉扎里伊斯迈于今年4月16辞去职务。与此同时,另外7位人权委员也在同月任期结束,最后一次的委任工作是在3年前的7月份,追朔至同年4月份。 为何无法立即委任人选…

未优先起用本地员工 350家公司遭列入人力部观察名单

人力部长杨莉明指出,政府有一份公平考量框架的观察名单,其中仍有350家公司,因为未公平录用本地雇员,仍保留在名单中。 杨莉明在昨日参与国会拨款委员会辩论部门开支预算,她指出,政府是在2014年8月出台这份观察名单,旨在加强以国人为主的劳动力核心,并确保企业在招聘时更公平、优先录用国人。 列入名单的大多数企业来自行政与支援服务、教育、资讯通信、专业服务和批发贸易领域。 名单中有行政、教育、通讯和专业服务企业 企业若被列入政府观察名单,意味着人力部将更为严密第审查该企业的就业准证申请。 外籍专才如经理、高管人员等,只有获得人力部发出的就业准证,才能来我国工作。自2016年以来,人力部约拒绝或抽回共2300份就业准证的申请。 杨莉明透露,名单原有610家公司。其中260家公司因人事作业有改善,而从名单上除名。 她指出,人力部也透过劳资政三方联盟(TAFEP),来鼓励企业改善他们的人事作业,例如仍在名单中的企业,至少聘请了3千800名本地PMET专才。 她举例,2017年6月,有一家建筑和工程公司被列入观察名单,但又无意和三方联盟合作,增加聘请本地员工,即便该公司多次上诉,甚至找议员帮忙,人力部也不批他们的就业准证申请。 最终,公司发现没有任何捷径,只好寻求劳动发展局,招聘来自技职学院或大专的实习生,一年半来录取了超过14名国人。 他也向议员们重申,三方联盟的举措旨在确保本地专才的权益获得保护,那些有公平聘用本地劳工的雇主无需担心。至于那些可能借助子公司或其他相关业务,来申请就业准证者,人力部也有能力禁止所有相关企业子业务的申请。