The FreeMyInternet group (FMI) has issued a media statement in response to the Media Development Authority’s MDA’s orders for The Real Singapore (TRS) to cease its operations yesterday on 3 May.

FMI states that the “disproportionate power vested in a statutory board” gave MDA too much discretion in censoring online content, and that the basis for censoring TRS remains unclear.

The group also indicated that MDA’s action “runs the risk of sub-judice” as TRS is currently facing a court case for articles that MDA alluded to, and that “as a statutory board, MDA should have known better than to take actions that can potentially pre-judge the court case.”

The full statement is appended below in full.


FMI thumbnailThe FreeMyInternet group expresses our complete and utter disappointment at the Media Development Authority’s (MDA) action in censoring The Real Singapore (TRS), call for this arbitrary and unsubstantiated action to be revoked immediately, and for MDA to come clean on its processes and standards as a regulatory body.

While not all of us might necessarily agree with TRS’s editorial direction or content, what TRS is alleged to have done is no reason for MDA to force a shutdown on the site. MDA’s actions exhibited two key problems: Disproportionate power vested in a statutory board, and unclear guidelines on actions to be taken against objectionable content.

The unfettered power given to MDA is disproportionate in that it gives a statutory board the the sole discretion to close down a website without due process, judiciary or otherwise. This is inconsistent with Singapore’s position as a state that is ruled by law, transparency and accountability.

Furthermore, MDA claimed TRS has “published prohibited material as defined by the Code to be objectionable on the grounds of public interest, public order and national harmony” and “responsible for several articles that sought to incite anti-foreigner sentiments in Singapore”. In relation to the current court case against TRS, this runs the risk of sub-judice. As a statutory board, MDA should have known better than to take actions that can potentially pre-judge the court case.

MDA has also clearly exhibited inconsistency in how it approaches “objectionable content”, be it online or in traditional media. MDA has claimed that “TRS has deliberately fabricated articles and falsely attributed them to innocent parties. TRS has also inserted falsehoods in articles that were either plagiarised from local news sources or sent in by contributors so as to make the articles more inflammatory.”

Objectionable, fabricated and plagiarised content is a regular practice in both mainstream and online media, and most certainly undesirable. But what gives MDA the right to stop the operation of a website on this basis? Websites managed by traditional news outlets have also been known to have fabricated content. Does MDA intend to take action against any website that plagiarises or fabricates content? What is MDA’s basis and standards for taking action, and what are the specific examples cited for TRS? Would it not be sufficient to request for the removal of specific articles rather than the termination of an entire website?

Ai Takagi and Yang Kaiheng with lawyer Choo Zheng Xi (image - CNA)
Ai Takagi and Yang Kaiheng with lawyer Choo Zheng Xi (image – CNA)

Without such clarity and accountability, we are left with no choice but to once again call doubt on MDA’s ability to be a fair and effective media regulator. The unsubstantiated and extraordinary actions taken by MDA against TRS cannot be seen as rules-based, transparent, and fair; only arbitrary and selective. As it is, we can only view MDA’s action against TRS as nothing short of a poorly-conceived and brutal attempt at censorship.

We also wish to highlight that MDA has chosen to take such action on 3 May, World Press Freedom Day. This is an affront to an international movement championed by the United Nations.

The FreeMyInternet group reaffirms our position that the right way to deal with any content deemed objectionable and offensive is with open discussion and reasoned debate. Such has also been the position championed by the Media Literacy Council. Shutting anyone down for disagreeable content, by anyone’s standard much less that of a regulator that has been inconsistent in its standards, is a trigger happy approach that reeks of blatant censorship and does not speak well of Singapore as a democratic country.

The above statement was made in exclusion of Mr Choo Zheng Xi, who is currently representing the editors of TRS in their court case.

* * * * *

People walk past mock gravestone during protest against new licensing regulations in SingaporeAbout FreeMyInternet

The FreeMyInternet movement was founded by a collective of bloggers who are against the licensing requirements imposed by the Singapore government on 1 June 2013, which requires online news sites to put up a performance bond of S$50,000 and comply within 24 hours to remove content that is found to be in breach of content standards. The group believes this to be an attempt at censorship and an infringement on the rights of Singaporeans to access information online and calls for a withdrawal of this licensing regime.

Subscribe
Notify of
76 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dr William Tan presented with Commonwealth Points of Light Award from Queen Elizabeth II

Singapore’s well-known para-athlete, medical doctor and charity fundraiser, Dr William Tan, was…

WP chief Pritam Singh supports Govt’s financial helps but questions if these assistance will be a “new normal” for Singapore

Workers’ Party (WP) Pritam Singh expressed in Parliament on Monday (6 April)…

假称免费按摩真揩油 前泰拳教练非礼罪名成立

一名前泰拳教练自称会泰式按摩,要求女学员脱掉衣物为她进行按摩,却在按摩过程趁机抚摸大腿内侧甚至靠近私密部位,而遭女学员喝止,涉嫌非礼女学员,目前被判有罪。 据案情显示,该名30岁教练为陈伟伦(译音,Tan Wai Luen),是Encore Muay Thai健身房的合伙人之一,于2016年10月1日被指涉嫌非礼33岁的女学员。 受害者供证时表示,她当时是因为看见脸书上的广告,有免费试用课程,因此决定前往健身房,而被告是接待她的教练,也向她说明有关免费试用课程的讲师。 当时受害者还与另外三名女性一起参加课程,而该名三名女性均为健身房的顾客。在课程结束后约下午2时45分,受害者并未离开,反而是与被告独留房内。 在受害者换回她的衣服后,她仍想与教练继续讨论接下来的课程。 就在此时,被告向她提出能够提供免费的泰式按摩,并自称是健身房内唯一拥有泰式按摩资格的教练,而被告听后并未起疑,也接受了被告的提议,脱下自己的衣物,惟留内衣物,躺在按摩桌上。 据控方指出,受害者当时脸部朝下,并使用毛巾遮盖。 随后被告也开始在受害者身上涂抹橄榄油按摩,正当按摩到大腿内侧时,一度靠近她的私密部位,让受害者感到相当不适,并下意识移动她的腿表明自己的不适。…

罕见疾病基金会成立 助患者支付昂贵医药费

卫生部与新加坡保健集团基金(Sing Health Fund)周二(2日)宣布成立新的慈善机构,用于支持患罕见疾病国人的昂贵医疗费用。 罕见疾病基金(RDF)旨在补助罕见疾病患者的医疗费用。在治疗罕见疾病上,其治疗费用一般都非常昂贵,患者无法支付,所以特设立基金会补助那些扣除政府补助、保险和金融援助后,仍相当昂贵的医疗费用。 为了鼓励公众多多益善,政府亦会给予每一元捐款配三元补助金,并且所有捐款将获得250巴仙的善款扣税。 至今,基金会已获得总金额7000万新元的捐款,其中1800万新元是来自于远东机构(Far East Organization)、国立大学医学组织(National University Health System)和赛马博彩管理局(Tote Board)。…