Chee
Yee, with bruised eye
Yee, with bruised eye

It is time to stop the practice of “name-calling and personal destruction” in Singapore’s political landscape, says Dr Chee Soon Juan, secretary general of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP).

Writing on the party’s website on Sunday, Dr Chee made the call in the light of the assault on 16-year old blogger and Youtuber, Amos Yee.

The teenager was hit in the face by a 49-year old man on Thursday as the former was making his way to the State Court for a pre-trial hearing.

The assault had apparently resulted in a bruised eye and cheek on the youth.

The assailant was reported to have been arrested by the police 12 hours after the incident and investigations are ongoing.

Amos Yee is currently in remand for breaching bail conditions.

It is unknown if he has been given medical attention.

Dr Chee’s remarks is the latest which call for restraint in how the public react to the teenager’s views.

The Media Literacy Council and the Singapore Kindness Movement have also cautioned against taking things into one’s own hands. (See here and here.)

“We heave [sic] a collective sigh of relief that the assailant did not carry a weapon, otherwise the situation could have turned even more tragic,” Dr Chee wrote. “As it is, if the culprit had landed closer to Amos’ ear, it could have caused critical perhaps even irreparable damage to the boy.”

Dr Chee pointed out that the physical assault on the teenager had been preceded by “expressions of hate” after Amos Yee’s controversial video on Youtube on the late Lee Kuan Yew’s death, which is also claimed to have insulted Christianity.

“We should not be surprised therefore that someone took it upon himself to express his emotions through a violent act,” the SDP leader said.

He added that “it is the PAP’s rhetoric, often bordering on incitement, that provides the substratum for mistrust and hate.”

Dr Chee then provided three examples of where the PAP’s rhetoric had allegedly or could have led to threats made against their opponents.

He cited the case of Tang Liang Hong who had taken part in the 1997 general elections and who “was accused of being an anti-Islam, anti-Christian Chinese chauvinist” by PAP leaders.

“The incendiary labels stoked vicious threats against Mr Tang so much so that immediately following the elections in 1997, he fled the country,” Dr Chee said.

He also related the experiences of former solicitor-general, Francis Seow, and former Workers’ Party chief, JB Jeyaretnam, both of whom Dr Chee said had had derogatory and incendiary labels ascribed to them, which could have led some to behave in “a very regrettable manner” towards the two men.

“I have been called a gangster, a traitor who opposes Singapore and even diagnosed a psychopath,” Dr Chee said. “When you top this off with a call to ‘annihilate’ me, you set up a scenario laced with poisonous tension, tempting individuals to perpetrate acts of malice and aggression.”

The SDP leader, whose first foray into electoral politics was in the 1992 by-election in Marine Parade, then disclosed two incidents where he himself had been targeted for such “acts of malice and aggression”.

“The first was that my German Shepherd dog was poisoned, the cause of death was confirmed by the vet. The second involved the repeated slashing of my car tyres. Both episodes happened in the late 1990s at the height of the PAP’s vitriol against me.”

Explaining that opponents of the PAP may not have the same security protection, he asks the latter to realise that “their opponents are vulnerable to attacks by persons on the violent fringe.”

Chee
Chee

“Engaging in over-the-top rhetoric and using violent imagery is dangerous,” the SDP chief warned.

“All it takes is just one moment of madness by one lone individual to commit one violent act, and no amount of calling for justice by the Minister for Law can undo the damage,” he said, referring to Mr K Shanmugam’s remarks following the assault on Amos Yee.

Mr Shanmugam had described the attack as “quite unacceptable”.

“I have often counseled against personal attacks and character assassination in our politics,” Dr Chee said. “It is base and primitive, and has absolutely no place in the modern and civilised nation that we aspire to.”

“I call on those in the PAP to stop its practice of name-calling and personal destruction.”

You can read the full text of Dr Chee’s article here: “This is why we must stop personal attacks in politics”.

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore escapes technical recession as economy grows 0.1% in Q3

The Singapore economy narrowly escapes technical recession as it grew 0.1% on…

Please calm down

I want you all to understand that people are tired, egos have…

IPOS: Lowered application fees for patent and trade mark protection from 1 April

Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) has announced that businesses and entrepreneurs…

【选举】人民之声未受邀参与电视辩论 林鼎揶揄行动党害怕威胁

新传媒在今晚(1日)举办大选辩论会,受邀对象除了人民行动党,还有在野党如新加坡前进党、工人党和新加坡民主党。 然而,人民之声党领袖林鼎,不满该党被排除在外,也推断该党未受邀,可能是该党成为行动党的最大威胁之一。 “新传媒不邀请人民之声参加辩论!可耻!这也证明我们一直所说的,我们已然成为人民行动党最大的威胁。“ 除了写下控诉,林鼎也拍下视频质问,其他参选候选人人数最多的在野党都受邀参加,而人民之声(10人)与民主党(11人)仅差一人,为何不能参加辩论。 “新传媒邀请四个政党进行这场辩论,当然除了人民行动党,还有三个参选人数最多的在野党如前进党24人、工人党20人、和民主党11人,然而,人民之声却被排除在外,尽管仅和民主党差一人。” 他也表示,人民之声当初是为了尊重在野党的原则,避免三角战,才会放弃一些选区,导致参选人数变少,但却并不知道会因此失去辩论的机会。 “如果当初得知结果如此,人民之声一定加派人力,参选更多选区。” 他也坦言,为了遵守在野党原则,放弃许多选区,让许多支持者和准候选人失望,不过他也承诺将在下一次大选卯足全力,让人民之声能够参加大选辩论。 林鼎解释,新传媒不希望人民之声能够参与此次辩论的原因,可能是因为想试图让辩论会变得不具威胁,而他此前却多次挑战人民行动党。 “当然,某媒体不想要让我参加辩论,你可以回顾过往的记录,在过去几年,我多次挑战人民行动党的部长们,可是他们却不敢回应我。” 他说,“他们当然想要邀请不具威胁性的政党,他们想要和平无争议的辩论会,但却无法直戳重点,他们想要移除为人民发声的政党,即指人民之声。” 林鼎直指,尽管无法参加,但他也不会放过质问的机会,他将会观看整场辩论会,并拍摄视频发表意见。…