Animal protection is important to Singaporeans and only a minority agrees with the current animal culling measures, as findings from a first-ever comprehensive public survey on animal protection issues in Singapore revealed.

ACRES logo verticalA joint effort by the Animal Concerns Research & Education Society (ACRES) and Millward Brown Singapore, a media and communication consultancy, the survey was conducted in January 2015 in order to better understand Singaporeans’ concerns and perspectives towards animal protection.

“The survey findings are very encouraging,” said Mr Louis Ng, Chief Executive of ACRES. “Animal protection is clearly an issue close to the heart of Singaporeans and this shows a strong sense of compassion in our society. While animals continue to be culled in Singapore due to public complaints, the findings here show that the complaints are from a minority of Singaporeans. We look forward towards working closely with the government on exploring and implementing alternative long-term humane solutions that will address both public and animal protection concerns.”

Millward Brown spoke to 600 Singaporeans though an independent mobile survey.

Key findings of the survey were:

  • 79% of Singaporeans agree that animal protection is important to them.
  • 71% of Singaporeans agree that nature reserves are important to them.
  • 10% of Singaporeans feel that shark’s fin consumption should be allowed.
  • 14% of Singaporeans feel that stray dog culling should be allowed.
  • 13% of Singaporeans feel that monkey culling should be allowed.
  • 14% of Singaporeans feel that wild boar culling should be allowed.
  • 36% of Singaporeans agree that the government is doing enough on animal protection.
  • 5% of Singaporeans disagree on harsher penalties with regard to the import/export/re-export and/or possession of endangered species.
  • 75% of Singaporeans are willing to support ACRES in advocating for an end to animal cruelty.

The survey also showed stronger support by Gen Y as compared to Gen X on several animal protection issues. 83% of Gen Y Singaporeans (as compared to 70% of Gen X Singaporeans) agree that animal protection is important to them and 81% of Gen Y Singaporeans (as compared to 63% of Gen X Singaporeans) are willing to support ACRES in advocating for an end to animal cruelty.

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

CPF restoration now – is it really good news?

NTUC Chief Lim Swee Say recently speaking on behalf of his labour…

Local cat cafe investigated over death of cats and lack of training

Cuddles cat cafe, a local cat cafe is said to be investigated…

ST finally reports SDP chairman Paul Tambyah’s new role as President-Elect of International Society of Infectious Diseases

Hours after two Progress Singapore Party (PSP) politicians had publically speculated on…

反对调高消费税 毕丹星:公开数据,让百姓评断该不该涨

在上周参与国会2020财案辩论时,工人党秘书长毕丹星重申该党反对调涨消费税的立场,并呼吁政府应更透明地公开财政数字。 毕丹星在致词中也申诉,过去之所以该党都在质询储备金的数额,乃是为了能探讨储备如何更好地改善低收入国民的处境。但在上一次财案,王瑞杰对为什么不能披露储备金,做了冗长答复。 他当时以《商业时报》的一篇报导,引述人民希望对储备金有更广泛的讨论。他认为这种要求更多透明度的呼声,未来几年都还会延续下去。更何况这也与官方“群策群力,共创未来”的精神相呼应,由国人担起责任,共同探索财政解决方案。 毕丹星重申,消费税时会直接冲击中低收入百姓、甚至那些退休、乐龄人士的税赋。 回溯2018年,工人党在国会调涨消费税,正是因为缺乏有关其他替代收入来源的信息。财长曾表示,一个人未必需要掌握所有信息才能作出决定。但是,今年财案的声明和明年不调高消费税的决定,很显然政府仍需依靠预估收入与指出才能做出判断。 “政府会公开这些预估(数据),好让新加坡老百姓也能批判地判断,到底有没有调涨消费税的必要?” 他说,相信这种开放资讯,有助对我国财政权衡课题有更实质性的对话和理解。 不公开储备金是为保护国家 去年2月,在国会总结2019财案辩论时,王瑞杰指出这些储备可作为战略防御,阻止那些有心破坏新加坡和新加坡利益的群体。此举能够预防犹如货币投机或其他类似的攻击。 当时毕丹星同样也询问有关新加坡储备金的数据,以便人们能够更清楚了解预算案的政策权衡时,王瑞杰表示他“被误导了”。 “我们的储备金,包括新加坡金融管理局(MAS)、新加坡政府投资公司(GIC),以及淡马锡控股公司的资产。金融管理局和淡马锡控股的规模是公共资讯,只有政府投资公司的部分没有透露,那是因为一旦有了相关的数据,我国的储备金基本一览无遗。”