injuries from scuffle
Facial injuries by Mr Lim after the police pinned him down on the floor. Bandages by paramedics called to scene.

A man has claimed that he was injured by a group of plainclothes police officers after he flipped the identification card of one officer who was taking down details from him.

Mr Lim Chin Huat, 40, a businessman has filed a police report on Saturday, 4 April, against the group of officers after sustaining multiple injuries from their actions.

Complaint’s story of what happened – The details below are similar to the police report submitted by Mr Lim. 

According to Mr Lim, he was drinking with a group of about 8 friends at a pub, “Yang Gui Fei”, located at Level 3 of Hotel Rendezvous on Thursday, 2 April, when a group of about 8 plainclothes police officers entered the place at 1.30 am in the early morning of Friday to conduct spot check.

The officers had their ID tags over their necks but they were turned inwards, said Mr Lim

When 2 or 3 of the police officers came to their table and asked for their identity cards, Mr Lim tried to ascertain the identity of the police officers who were conducting the spot-check but the officers refused to identify themselves.

However, Mr Lim still cooperated and surrendered his identification card to to the police officers despite not being shown the ID cards.

The police officers then started asking Mr Lim’s group for their contact numbers after they had recorded the details from their NRICs. While doing this, one of the officers kept pointing at Mr Lim, which led Mr Lim to ask for his name once again.

The police officer mumbled his name which Mr Lim could not decipher clearly. Mr Lim then asked the police officer to write down his name for him but the officer refused to do so. Instead he told Mr Lim to write it down himself if he wanted to.

Mr Lim asked for a piece of paper from the office, who had a stack of papers in front of him, but the officer declined to give any to Mr Lim. Mr Lim thus had no choice but to take a serviette to write the name down.

According to Mr Lim, he reached out and turned the name tag of the police officer around to see the officer’s name. At this point, the police officer’s colleagues shouted at Mr Lim, saying that he was not allowed to touch the ID.

Mr Lim said that he quickly apologised and said that he was not aware that he was not allowed to do this.

According to what Mr Lim recalled, the officers made obvious eye contact with each other and started restraining his arms, without any warning given and he was unaware why they were doing that. There were also no instructions given by the police officers to him of what to do next, whether he should squat down or place his hands anywhere.

The police officers proceeded to pin him down to the floor and Mr Lim landed on his right-cheek. Mr Lim’s arms were pushed to the back and had his hands handcuffed.

According to Mr Lim, the officers surrounded him and applied heavy force to his arms and kept shouting, “Don’t move!”, even though he was not moving at all.

While he did not struggle during the arrest, the police officers slammed their knee cap on his face repeatedly, and as a result, Mr Lim bled profusely from his head.

Only when someone shouted, “Bleeding already!”, did the officers stop what they were doing to Mr Lim. The person who shouted is believed to be a bystander.

The police officers then held Mr Lim tightly on his arm and forced his head to be lowered. They then held Mr Lim up forcefully to stand up and dragged him out of the pub and into a lift. Mr Lim’s friends who were with him were denied access to the lift to accompany Mr Lim.

As they were heading towards the police car, one of the officers slammed Mr Lim’s head onto the car bonnet (see the below photo).

pinned to the bonnet
In the video below, Mr Lim’s friends recorded the scene where the police officers wanted to put him into the police car but he refused to do so as he does not trust the officers anymore. Mr Lim called out to his friends to call his lawyer and said he wanted to go to the hospital instead.

[youtube id=”0uy_B-E6VWE” align=”center” mode=”normal”]

According to Mr Lim, he told the paramedics who arrived at the scene with the ambulance that he was beaten by the police, but Mr Lim said he understands that the paramedics were powerless to do anything outside of their job scope.

Injuries sustained from the incident

Photos of the injuries substained during the scuffle with the police officers.

The hospital discharge record show that Mr Lim suffered injuries to his head and had a fracture to his nasal bone.

hospital results

Although his arm was fractured, the hospital did not include this in the report as they said that it would only be available in a detailed medical report which is available to investigators.

fractured arm

Mr Lim said in Chinese, “The police cannot be trusted, there is no justice.”

“The police does not follow proper procedure”

He added, “This is not what I expected the police to be.”

He also said that the police did not show any concern when he was bleeding.

Mr Lim is believed to have been charged by the police for disorderly behavior by speaking loudly in public and for assaulting a police officer for tugging at the lanyard of the officer, which Mr Lim denies.

TOC has written to the Singapore Police Force on the matter and will include their response if or when they reply.

Writer’s note – On the point about presenting two sides of the story, out of all the enquiries which TOC has sent so far to the SPF, most are left unanswered even after several months and even if the police do reply, they would say that the information requested is private or ask TOC to read from what has been published.

Subscribe
Notify of
80 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Job security an increasing priority for job seekers in Singapore, according to JobStreet study

Job security (11.4%) has crept up to become one of the top…

有好多星期的“不眠之夜” 梁文辉:维文理应更早厘清“合力追踪”数据事宜

周一(4日),内政部政务部长陈国明在国会答复议员质询时表示,刑事诉讼法赋予警方权力,可获取任何数据,包括合力追踪便携器的数据,随即引发一阵议论。 事缘在去年6月5日,外交部长维文曾在国会表示,合力追踪数据仅限于防疫追踪用途。在去年6月9日,在抗疫跨部门工作小组的记者会上,也回应坊间对于“合力追踪”侵犯隐私的质疑,解释这款配备仅记录的蓝牙近距离接触数据,无全球定位芯片、也不具备互联网通信功能,为此不可能未经用户许可就外泄。 内政部兼律政部长尚穆根与维文,则在本月5日在国会作出进一步澄清,指警方只有在追踪重大罪案时,才能动用“合力追踪”数据。 主管智慧国计划的维文坦言,在得知刑事诉讼法也适用于“合力追踪”数据,确实曾“睡不着觉”,“我在想:是否要说服我的内阁同僚修法?但经过深思熟虑、讨论和质询了朝野内外人士的意见,我想目前这样我们做得很好,能确保新加坡的安全,也能应对当前危机。” 新加坡前进党非选区议员梁文辉,此前也在国会针对此课题质询维文。他对此事发表后续评论,“先礼后兵”强调本身仍持续相信部长维文和政府的诚信,也无理由去怀疑部长维文的说法。 后者称本身未想到刑事诉讼法(Criminal Procedure Code),可用于索取“合力追踪”数据,并认为应坦诚澄清,因此感谢国会同僚提出这道询问。 但梁文辉也指出,若维文实属“真诚”疏忽(‘genuine’ oversight),那么他应更早和直接地公开这资讯。“他有“好多个星期”的不眠之夜、去思索或询问他的内阁同僚,以改善法令。” 不过,与其主动向公众坦诚,似乎要等到内政部政务部长答复国会议员提问,维文才在隔日出来澄清。 透明度要全面、及时…

SMRT: Commuters to expect 10 mins additional travelling time from Boon Lay to Jurong East due to track fault

Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT) has tweeted that its passengers of East-West…

Record 42 imported COVID-19 cases detected since circuit breaker with 60% from India

The Ministry of Health (MOH) reported that as of yesterday (10 Jan),…