By Singapore Anti-Death Penalty Campaign, Chong Kai Xiong, Rachel Zeng

Image from Zaobao, provided by Singapore Police Force
Image from Zaobao, provided by Singapore Police Force

Muhammad bin Kadar, 39, was executed on 17 April 2015. He received the death sentence for killing a 69-year-old woman during a robbery in the victim’s flat that occurred in May 2005.

Muhammad had a low IQ of 76 and was under the influence of Dormicum when he entered the flat of Mdm Tham Weng Kuen and repeatedly attacked her with a knife and later a chopper from her kitchen. The victim later died of blood loss from the profuse wounds she suffered.

In 2009, Muhammad was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by the High Court. His appeal for diminished responsibility rejected by the Appellate Court in 201 1 . After amendments to the mandatory death penalty regime were introduced in late 201 2, Muhammad applied for a re-sentence. The apex court determined that he had caused death with the “intention to kill” and upheld the death penalty. The final appeal for presidential clemency was rejected a week before Muhammad’s execution.

We at the Singapore Anti-Death Penalty Campaign (SADPC) believe that Muhammad’s death sentence should have been commuted in view of his low IQ and the influence of Dormicum. The defence psychiatrist had stated that the drug likely led to a “major reduction in self-control and regulation” of Muhammad’s actions and that the intention to silence the victim was likely to have formed under the disinhibitory effects of Dormicum. So while Muhammad had planned to forcefully rob Mdm Tham and consumed Dormicum to embolden himself, the fatal attack was not premeditated and very much an afterthought influenced by the drug.

The death penalty is often and instinctively put forward as an effective deterrent of crime. Yet in the circumstances, we find great difficulty in seeing how this tragedy could have been prevented by the threat of execution given Muhammad’s state of mind. Muhammad was a part-time odd job labourer with a history of substance abuse who was desperate for money to feed his drug habit. With a low IQ and only primary school education, Muhammad was socio- economically vulnerable to substance abuse and attendant problems. Imposing the death penalty in cases like these has the opposite effect of justice by disproportionately punishing the marginalised.

Media reports on the case have highlighted and even headlined the brutal manner of the murder. The SADPC maintains our opposition to the death sentence even for such cases. The death penalty is an ethically questionable choice of punishment as it shares the intentionality and instrumentality of violence with every act of murder. Judicial executions are in effect the most premeditated of all murders, even if they are aimed at achieving peace and security. We reject the death penalty because justice requires the congruence of means and ends.

SADPC continues to call for the abolition of the death penalty. We urge the country to look deeper into the roots of crime and find more humane and holistic ways to rehabilitate and reintegrate people like Muhammad. We strongly believe every person deserves a chance at atonement by contributing back to society.

Subscribe
Notify of
25 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

It’s not that Singaporeans want foreigners, it’s the quality of foreign talents needed: KF Seetoh

It is not that Singaporeans want foreigners, it is the quality of…

本月中起调整部分公交服务 网友深感不满抨击“没顾及人民”

在本月16日开始,公共巴士服务将出现调整,700和700A公交路线将停止服务,171公交路线的服务范围也缩减,从义顺公交站启程,绕过武吉班让地铁站;而972公交服务路线也改道,转而服务武吉知马/杜尼安路(Dunearn Road)、纽顿地铁站以及史各士路(Scotts Road)。 新加坡SMRT集团于周一(8日3日)作出以上公布时,遭到不少市民和通勤者的批评,认为有关更动未免过于突然,令人措手不及。 针对民众的反应,陆路交通管理局昨日(8月4日)在脸书上帖文解释,有关的公交服务调整,是基于相关路线的巴士乘客人数急剧下降,以及需要审慎使用公帑。 “对我们来说是个艰难的决定,因为我们正面对艰难的困境,既要平衡公交服务的可行性,更要合理性使用公帑。” 据当局指出,自第二阶段的滨海市区线(Downtown Line,简称DTL)在2015年12月开放后,与该地铁路线平行的公交服务载客量就大幅度减少。 在DTL第二阶段开放后的首年,171公交路线的载客量就下降了三成,而700公交路线的载客量更下降超过一半。 陆交局透露,当局每年都拨款以维持171路线和700路线的公交服务,700路线的每年公交服务补贴就高达500万元。 “若这是该区唯一的公共交通,我们可以表示有关的公共支出是合理的。但是,鉴于DTL已经成为替代方案,我们需要审视开支,因此必须对地方上的服务进行调整。” 当局也指出,自2016年以来就一直和基层顾问进行磋商,以探索能够满足居民需求,并更加善用公帑的方法。2017年2月推介的973公交服务路线就是有关磋商的成果。…

市民吁C级病房备空调 卫生部回复:去住A或B1病房!

市民莉莉(译名,Lily Ong)于日前投函《海峡时报》,申诉本地医院的津贴病房缺乏空调设备。卫生部在数日后复函,对有关的空调课题给出理由,并且表示已采取数项措施,以便解决。但是有关的理由和现实写照一对比,反而令人感到不能理解了。“难道医院的美观,比病患的舒适程度来得重要吗?” 莉莉在信中表达意见,提到C级病房的住院患者,仿佛笼罩在闷热氛围中,只因为没有空调。 信中写道,她发现很多C级病房的患者都是年长者,因此她建议应在病房内安装空调设备。她认为,在这个炎热潮湿的国家,以及受到全区暖化影响的现在,空调已然是个基本必需品。 她也指出,新加坡国际事务研究所预测,今年我国还会面对严重烟霾问题,但医院还让患者躺在敞开的窗户旁边,岂非令病患曝露在空气污染引起的健康隐忧? 莉莉的信函引起了卫生部的关注。卫生部的回函于上周(6月8日)在《海时》刊出。 为病患提供可负担病房 卫生部政策及基础设施规划主任Low Chian Siong,在回函中写道,“想住有空调设备病房的病患,可选择入住A级或B1级病房”。 他在信件中阐述了我国公立医院,为患者提供了安全、可负担和有效医疗护理,并且为了提供病患可负担的补贴病房,有关病房的设计旨在满足患者的基本需求。 已采取数项降温措施…

The Dolphin Project makes proposal to RWS over dolphins

The following is a letter from Mr Richard O’Barry to Resorts World…