ida

Nisha Padmanabhan is an employee of the Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) of Singapore, a statutory board under the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI).

She was hired as an Applications Consultant by the IDA in 2014.

Ms Nisha, an Indian-born Singapore citizen who apparently has been working in Singapore since 2006, has a Bachelor’s degree “from a reputable university”, according to the IDA.

She was hired by the IDA because of her “extensive past work experience and good track record”, besides her degree.

Ms Nisha, however, is being accused of also possessing a fake Masters’ degree.

On 6 April, one Sam Tan posted a link to a discussion thread on the SG Talk forum about fake degrees being used by foreigners in Singapore on the IDA Facebook page, asking for the stat board to respond. (See here.)

The thread in the forum had claimed that Ms Nisha had received a Masters’ degree from “South Pacific University”, a known degree mill which churns out fake academic degrees.

The non-existent South Pacific University, supposedly based in Hawaii, has been closed down by a US court order in 2002. (See here.)

On 7 April, Mr Tan again posted on the IDA page again.

“I wrote about recently about an employee at your esteemed office with a dubious degree,” he said.

He asked for the outcome of any investigations by the IDA into the matter. (See here.)

One week later, on 14 April, the IDA posted the following response to Mr Tan’s query:

“Thank you for your patience. We have investigated and would like to share that Nisha Padmanabhan, a Singapore citizen who joined IDA in 2014, has a Bachelor’s degree from a reputable university and was recruited because of this Bachelor degree, extensive past work experience and good track record. Nisha pursued an MBA out of personal interest, and it was not a relevant certificate for her position in IDA though she was open about the fact that she had obtained it.

“Her MBA from Southern Pacific University was not a factor that contributed to her employment at IDA.

“In fact, 93.5% of all IDA staff that were hired at the level of Applications Consultant were based on their Bachelor’s degree.

“We would like to share that Nisha has been a committed team member and contributed in her role as an Applications Consultant for the past year. We would also like to take this chance to share that IDA selects employees based on a holistic set of criteria which includes their educational qualifications, work experience, individual career aspirations and personality traits.”

In brief, the IDA seems to be saying that Ms Nisha’s alleged fake Masters’ degree was inconsequential to the decision to hire her at the IDA.

The IDA’s explanation, however, did not seem convincing to some members of the public.

Ms Liu Ching Man posted her response to IDA: “So are you saying she had hid the fact that she ‘had’ this questionable MBA from 2006 at the point of recruitment into IDA in 2014, ie you condone false declaration of qualifications? Or are you saying that your HR knowingly accepted the questionable qualifications in her resume at the point of employment because the MBA was irrelevant to her position ie your organization condones a questionable qualification as long as its not relevant to the job?”

Mr Yeo Kee Wee saw it as a matter of integrity.

“This is a matter of personal integrity and how IDA portrays itself to Singapore and the world,” he posted. “So, it is ok for IDA to accept this kind of conduct from their employees?”

Ms Sarah Wong said:

“IDA, this is a matter of public interest. How IDA evaluate your potential candidates is irrelevant to the issue. The issue is your employee has publicly declared obtaining a degree from an institution that has recently been surfaced to be of dubious nature. If that is proven to be true and henceforth, the public would need to be assured that our public institutions are not staffed with personnel with questionable conduct and integrity. Please look into this matter again.”

In 2013, the problem of foreigners using fake degrees to obtain work passes in Singapore was in the spotlight after the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) charged 25 foreigners “for furnishing false information to the Controller of Work Passes by submitting forged academic certificates to obtain work passes.” (See here.)

20 of the 25 were sentenced to four weeks’ imprisonment, while five were fined $5,000.

The MOM said then that it would “also take action against errant employers and employment agents if they have abetted such acts.”

Also in 2013, the law was amended to stiffen the penalties for such offences.

The forging of educational certificates is now a standalone offence where a guilty person may be jailed for two years and fined $20,000.

Previously, the maximum penalty was a year in jail and a $15,000 fine.

MOM said that the “fraudulent submission of forged academic certificates to by-pass work pass eligibility criteria is a deliberate attempt to mislead the Controller [of Work Passes].”

“MOM will not condone such acts of false declaration, and will take severe actions against offenders,” it said.

Subscribe
Notify of
220 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

选举期间谁行使《防假消息法》? 各部门常任秘书代行

若国会解散,各部门部长将卸任,届时谁行使《防假消息法》权益? 根据昨日(8日)发布的其中一篇政府宪报,阐述若选举期间,由16政府部门的常任秘书代行。 在《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》下,若选举令状发出,部长停止职权,惟他们的职权可由其他权职者代行,包括高级公务员。 防假消息法是在2019年10月25日宪报。去年4月1日,《防假消息法》正式提呈国会,并在5月8日,经过两天的激辩,晚上10时20分结束前,以72票赞成,九票反对,三票弃权三读通过 2019年6月3日,该法提呈予哈莉玛总统批准。 5月8日的第105次国会会议,《防假消息法》在国会引起朝野激烈辩论,工人党议员表态反对,相续对《防假消息法》提出观点,其中也包括质疑何以新法赋予部长取缔假信息的权力,以及为何绕过司法审讯,由部长先行裁决假消息并采取行动。 人民行动党72议员投下赞成票,工人党的六名议员:毕丹星、林瑞莲、刘程强、方荣发、陈硕茂和费沙,三名非选区议员:贝理安、吴佩松和陈立峰则投下反对票。 《防假消息法》备受争议 该法自提呈国会以来即备受争议,不仅政界人士,包括国内外学术界、媒体、公民组织等都已对该法提出质疑。

High Court approves AGC’s proceeding against Li Shengwu; Li contests AGC’s claims and notes its double standards

The High Court granted approval for the Attorney General’s Chambers to carry…

【选举】新党、新人到新选区仍平均得票四成 陈清木:继续深耕出战选区

新加坡前进党秘书长陈清木医生,在召开记者会时表示,不会对此次选举结果感到挫折,反之仍会再接再厉,也会继续深耕出战的选区。 他表示,作为一个新成立政党,尽管所有新人都在上阵选区落败,然而该党平均在各个选区获得的选民支持率约为40巴仙,这意味着该党带来一定影响。