flag

In a social experiment to see how Singaporeans and the public would react, 22-year old student Ben Matchap placed an A4-sized copy of the Singapore flag on the ground at a busy public pathway in Dhoby Ghaut.

Matchap, a student at Lasalle and a parkour enthusiast, then had his friends help him record the scene from different angles as people walked where the flag was.

In the video recording, which Matchap said was about 10 to 15 minutes of the total time the flag was left on the ground, no one picked up the flag, although one man did stop, but only to take a photo of it on his electronic device.

Singaporeans’ respect (or lack of) for the flag was also a matter of public controversy after the National Day Parade celebrations.

The flags were seen left behind on the ground and even in rubbish bins, along with other trash, as The New Paper reported:

flagtnp4

 

flagtnp3

flagtnp

flagstnp2

Here are a few more examples of how shabbily the flag was treated: “Police investigating toppled Singapore flags”.

As Singapore celebrates its 50th year of independence, how much do Singaporeans really feel about the country?

This, arguably, may be reflected in how much they respect or how they treat the national flag.

The Online Citizen (TOC) asked Matchap about the experiment and how he feels about what he saw.

The Online Citizen (TOC): What is the motivation behind the video/experiment?

Ben Matchap (BM): Amidst all the hoohah about Amos Yee being disrespectful I noticed that Singaporeans become very patriotic whenever someone has something negative to say about us, whether it is warranted or not, like in the case of Amos Yee and Stephanie Koh.

I wanted to see just how patriotic Singaporeans are. Would anyone pick up the flag? Would they avoid it? Would they just not care?

 TOC: Can you tell us some details of the experiment – like, how long did you leave the flag on the floor, where did this experiment take place, how many people do you think walked past it?

BM: So we did this for about 10-15 mins. It was an A4-sized flag. I wanted it to be noticeable yet avoidable. I had a few friends help me record it from another angle. I am guessing about 50 people walked past it.

TOC: What do you think the results say about our attitude towards the flag?

BM: I think Singaporeans just don’t care enough. Some of them saw it and avoided it, but no one bothered to pick it up. I think the flag and our pledge are taken lightly by Singaporeans.

We sing the songs, say the pledge and wave the flag. But most of the time we are just going through the motion. No one wanted to make a conscious decision to remove the flag from the sidewalk.

TOC: What do you hope this video will do?

BM: I hope this video will stir up a discussion about what it means to be Singaporean and make us question ourselves a little more.

TOC: Some people may feel you are denigrating the flag by doing this social experiment. What would you say to them?

BM: Yes I did put the flag on the floor. But people could have picked it up. I guess it’s a pretentious artistic reference to how when people put us Singaporeans down we scream bloody murder instead of “picking ourselves up” and responding in a dignified manner.

TOC: What does the flag mean to you personally?

BM: It is a symbol of our nation. An idea. How accurate it is though is up for question.

TOC: Why do you hope for Singaporeans to treat the flag with more respect?

BM: I only hope for Singaporeans to be more aware of what they are doing. No action is still action. I want Singaporeans to know that they CAN make a difference and that they have an active part to play in shaping Singapore.

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

未优先起用本地员工 350家公司遭列入人力部观察名单

人力部长杨莉明指出,政府有一份公平考量框架的观察名单,其中仍有350家公司,因为未公平录用本地雇员,仍保留在名单中。 杨莉明在昨日参与国会拨款委员会辩论部门开支预算,她指出,政府是在2014年8月出台这份观察名单,旨在加强以国人为主的劳动力核心,并确保企业在招聘时更公平、优先录用国人。 列入名单的大多数企业来自行政与支援服务、教育、资讯通信、专业服务和批发贸易领域。 名单中有行政、教育、通讯和专业服务企业 企业若被列入政府观察名单,意味着人力部将更为严密第审查该企业的就业准证申请。 外籍专才如经理、高管人员等,只有获得人力部发出的就业准证,才能来我国工作。自2016年以来,人力部约拒绝或抽回共2300份就业准证的申请。 杨莉明透露,名单原有610家公司。其中260家公司因人事作业有改善,而从名单上除名。 她指出,人力部也透过劳资政三方联盟(TAFEP),来鼓励企业改善他们的人事作业,例如仍在名单中的企业,至少聘请了3千800名本地PMET专才。 她举例,2017年6月,有一家建筑和工程公司被列入观察名单,但又无意和三方联盟合作,增加聘请本地员工,即便该公司多次上诉,甚至找议员帮忙,人力部也不批他们的就业准证申请。 最终,公司发现没有任何捷径,只好寻求劳动发展局,招聘来自技职学院或大专的实习生,一年半来录取了超过14名国人。 他也向议员们重申,三方联盟的举措旨在确保本地专才的权益获得保护,那些有公平聘用本地劳工的雇主无需担心。至于那些可能借助子公司或其他相关业务,来申请就业准证者,人力部也有能力禁止所有相关企业子业务的申请。

Shouldn’t MINDEF be more transparent about servicemen deaths?

Joel Tan investigates the sudden deaths of NSmen.

五房式组屋也可参与屋契回购计划

针对总理李显龙在国庆群众大会发表的政策,国家发展部长黄循财在昨日也作出回应,表示该部探讨推出短期计划,例如在屋契回购计划下,让住户可出售部分屋契套现,但仍积蓄住在现有组屋。 黄循财在题为《提前规划下阶段公共住房政策》的博文中,指出李显龙在国庆群众大会提出规划性提升旧租屋,意即翻新或重新规划旧组屋市镇,都是数十年推行的长期计划。 黄循财赞许我国公共住宅政策取得成功,多年来提供国人优质房屋。当前,针对现有人口年龄变化和建筑物屋龄增涨,当局也计划把公共住宅政策推向新阶段。 国家发展部则顺应现有发展,推出短期计划,特别是协助乐龄住户为他们的组屋解锁更多价值。 “今天,许多年长住户选择出租部分房间来增加收入。一些则选择卖掉现有组屋,在乐龄安居花红下该住较小型住宅。” 提升旧组屋在转售市场价值 对此,黄循财说当局正寻求如何提升旧组屋在转售市场的流通性。 当局将于公积金局局探讨,改善一些机制,提供更多弹性给想购买屋契年龄短组屋的买家。与此同时,确保他们有足够的退休金。 当前,我们可用公积金购买旧组屋,不过为了确保买家购买终身房屋,同时不影响个人退休积蓄,为此仍有设定某些限制。 住户也可出售部分屋契套现,但同时还是能积蓄住在现有组屋。 黄循财认为,屋契回购计划过去只针对四房式组屋和小型组屋。然而, 一些长者希望能在原有组屋终老,或是希望子孙来探望时,能在更宽敞的空间与家人团聚。…

Preventable Deaths at Traffic Junctions

~ By David L K See ~ I refer to Straits Times…