The following is the content of an email sent to the People’s Association (PA) by Mr Andrew Loh. The email, sent on 03 April 2015, asks the PA about the online posting by an alleged grassroots leader which had threatened to do physical violence on a 16-year old boy who had criticised the late Lee Kuan Yew and the Christian religion.

jasontan

The email:

Dear sir / ma’am,

I am not sure if you are aware of the incident where a reported grassroots leader from the Telok Blangah area is said to have made a public threat of physical violence against a 16-year old boy who had created and posted an online video about Lee Kuan Yew and the Christian religion.

The grassroots leader, one Jason Tan, posted on Facebook the following threat:

“For me, I would cut his dick and put in his mouth for blemish Jesus Christ”.

Pls see here:

http://www.tremeritus.com/…/grassroots-leader-threatens-to…/

http://www.tremeritus.com/…/investigations-on-filipino-edz…/

http://www.tremeritus.com/…/grassroots-leader-removes-face…/

Such a threat or remarks by a grassroots leader, and directed at a young boy of 16, is a cause of deep concern to the public. This is especially so when such a community leader is in a position of influence and authority.

To date, however, there have been no reaction from the People’s Association which, I believe, appoints all grassroots leaders to their positions.

I would therefore like to ask:

1. Is the PA aware of the incident and the threat made by Mr Tan?

2. Can the PA confirm that Mr Tan is indeed a grassroots leader under the PA?

3. What action has the PA taken with regards to this incident, if indeed any action has been taken?

3. If no action has been taken so far, will the PA be doing so? If not, could you explain why?

4. Would the PA be issuing a statement on the incident, especially to remind all grassroots leaders that such threats of physical violence are unacceptable?

5. Will the PA be getting in touch with the family of the 16-year old boy and the boy himself to assure them that Mr Tan’s conduct is not condoned by the PA?

I look forward to your prompt reply.

Thank you.

Regards,
Andrew Loh

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

马政府将废除反假新闻法

我国政府为拟定反假新闻法,设立国会特委会,于今年三月召开“网络蓄意散播假消息”听证会,收集媒体、专业人士和民间意见,打算透过立法管制网络散布的假消息。 不过,邻国马来西亚的新政府,显然有不同的决定:决意要在来临7月的国会中,辩论废除甫诞生两个月的《2018年反假新闻法令》,理由是该法令定义过于模糊,也违反了宪法赋予人民言论自由的精神。 马国通讯与多媒体部长哥宾星向媒体证实会在来临的国会提成废除反假新闻法动议。 (视频来源:STAR TV) “我们(希盟)已经达成共识,决定废除反假新闻法,法令本身有问题,没有经过仔细探讨就通过。”同时,他承诺会重新检讨所有与假新闻相关的法令,或者针对假新闻另外拟定新的法令。 早前,行动党资深领袖林吉祥曾建议媒体自行拟定反假新闻法,引起坊间猜疑,不过他已澄清,本身是针对社交媒体如巫统枪手等时常作出不实指控,为此建议媒体、律师公会和公民团体去检视和提出解决方案。 他曾抨击反假新闻法是纳吉掩饰一马公司弊案的工具,借以堵住任何对该案件提出质疑的人士。 《2018年反假新闻法令》甫在今年4月通过,不过随着国阵政府失去政权,希盟上台后,要落实的百日承诺之一就是废除反假新闻法。 前首相纳吉是在今年进行第14届全国大选前,在国会通过反假新闻法,强调该法“不箝制新闻自由”,呼吁媒体勿过于担心。 假新闻法含糊不清 该法令阐明,任何制造、提供、转发或刊登假新闻者,或出版任何含有假新闻的刊物,可被判最高刑罚监禁6年、或罚款50万令吉或两者兼施。…

MDA's problematic corporate governance continues

~By: Ng Yi Shu and additional reporting by Ravi Philemon~ A recent…

Mission of public education is to facilitate social mobility

by Singaporean Sophist I refer to the article “MM Lee: Family backgrounds…

Conversations on mandatory death penalty must be based on facts

~by: Ravi Philemon~ On 1 February 2012, I wrote an article for…