Chinatown 1955
Chinatown 1955
Chinatown 1955

By Min Cheong

Some time ago, my father let me in on an exchange that took place between him and Lee Kuan Yew – a story I found fascinating for a myriad of reasons.

It was 1978, and Dad was a Captain in the Armed Forces. He was asked by the Permanent Secretary of Defence of that era, George Bogaars, to deliver a suitcase to LKY, who at that time was based in Harvard University.

After a flight and a train ride, my dad met LKY and presented the briefcase to him. The inspection of the document contained inside was almost cursory, but the conversation which ensued was much more intriguing and of consequence.

He invited my dad to take a walk with him in the varsity gardens, and sought his opinion on a matter of national security. After pondering over the issue for a while and coming to a difficult but necessary decision, he handed my dad two orange frisbees, saying, “Please give this to my sons”.

It was a story that to me was intimately revealing; epitomising LKY as an iconic statesman faced with profound challenges in the position and responsibilities he had taken on, as well as a man who was constantly preoccupied with love, concern and affection for his family. It changed the regard I held him in; compelling me to see him as a multifaceted person, not too different from the rest of us beneath style and status.

On another occasion, my dad shared his experience helping to establish the Air Force from – well, one could say – the ground up. He was tasked with scouring the boneyard in Arizona (Davis Monthan Air Base) for military aircraft we could use to get our Air Force up and running.

He returned upon selecting a batch of Skyhawks, and told me that Dr Goh Keng Swee was rather pleased, to say the least. After one particular meeting, Dr Goh left the conference room clutching a model of the Skyhawk, stating, “My Air Force!” with palpable pride and passion.

The civil servants of yesteryear were collectively the soul of Singapore. Their dedication, conviction, zeal, and – on many occasions – their absolute refusal to be sycophants, breathed life into the nation and fire from its belly.

I’ve told close friends how much my dad’s anecdotes have influenced my socio-political views; how deep my connection to this country has become (which is why I engage in such heated debates on policy with those around me – and I don’t often agree with the establishment), and how much more enchanted with our real national historical narrative I am as a result.

This is also why I was glad that in his eulogy, PM Lee heralded the contributions of his father and his father’s team – because my prevailing sentiment all throughout the week was that much as we have shown respect and demonstrated gratitude to LKY, we have in our somewhat unenlightened reverence of the man cast a light so bright on his legacy (perhaps a version that doesn’t truly embody all his deeds, at that) that many others who have contributed so significantly to our nation have had to contend with lying in the shadows.

So in his passing, while we mourn the loss of a leader who was – whether we agree with his policies or not – a visionary, force to have been reckoned with and formidable strategist, it’s as good a time as any to begin delving deeper into history to find our place in the world as Singaporeans.

Ask questions, such as – who was Albert Winsemius, how did he shape the nation-state, why did he never feature in our textbooks, and why is the only tribute to him a small lane in the Sunset Way estate that leads to a refuse dump?

Search for stories, because they’re all around us – in our architecture, landscape, cuisine, culture, geopolitical environment, political milieu, and most powerfully and heartwarmingly, in our collective experience and individual endeavours.

Because LKY’s team wasn’t just comprised of his Cabinet ministers and the civil service at large – it was a team of every single Singaporean who empowered themselves to make Singapore what it is now.

This is what our national rhetoric should be.

Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

More questions for Dr Ong

TOC sends email to Dr Ong Seh Hong about his loan from Ren Ci.

Celebrities leave Singapore because of kids' education

By Yasmeen Banu Nadya Hutagalung, the 39-year old host of Asia’s Next…

WP’s chief Pritam Singh remembers 90-year-old ardent supporter of the party after his passing

Singapore’s Workers’ Party (WP) chief and Leader of the Opposition (LO) took…

削首相权力 赋权国会遴选总稽查司

马来西亚反贪内阁特别委员会,于本月13日议决,将削弱首相权力,把遴选和委任稽查司和反贪污委员会的权限,交给国会遴选委员会。 首相敦马哈迪说,未来首相将不再干预总稽查司的遴选,政府和首相署也无权过问总稽查署事务,不论惩处、解雇、降职和该署财政预算,都是由国会遴选委员会定夺。 希盟政府为推动反贪改革,成立反贪内阁特委会。该委会是在13日举行第三次会议,并由首相敦马召开新闻发布会。 议员部长需呈报财产 敦马称,会议上也讨论加紧强化政府结构,削减官员贪污的几率。 针对申报财产进展,敦马指出当局将准备表格,让国会议员和部长直到如何呈报。 目前,该国总稽查署直接由首相署管辖。总稽查司人选是由首相建议给最高元首核准。削弱首相权力,包括限制首相任期至两届,也是希盟政府的竞选承诺。 不过,总稽查署任命涉及宪法规章,意味着希盟政府需在国会获得三分二议决,争取反对党议员的支持,才能通过修宪,将有关权限交给国会。 纳吉首相署形同“小内阁” 在前首相拿督斯里纳吉执政期间,权力集中于首相署,首相纳吉还兼任财政部长,同时首相署旗下政府部长过于庞大,拥有10名正部长和三名副部长,掌管事务几乎包山包海,例如:宗教事务、掌管首相署经济策划局、掌管司法事务、核能与小贩事务、中小企业与新村事务、国民团结事务和国会事务等等。 其中,掌管国会事务的首相署部长阿莎丽娜,也曾被前任下议院院长丹斯里班迪卡谴责越权;至于马国知名时事评论员黄进发博士也曾批评纳吉内阁“满朝皆部长”,透过委派官职分配权力蛋糕,来酬佣支持者,稳固派系势力。 同时,首相署旗下掌管太多机构,与其他部门权限重叠,例如交通部却无法管制火车、巴士乃至德士,因为主管单位乃是首相署旗下的陆路交通委员会(SPAD)。…