lien foundation book launch
Image from Lien Centre for Social Innovation

 

Singapore, 20 March 2015 (Friday) – The Lien Centre for Social Innovation (LCSI) has published the first handbook covering literature on poverty, inequality and unmet social needs in Singapore. The launch took place on 17 March and featured a panel of speakers whose work is cited in the handbook.

Entitled, “A Handbook on Inequality, Poverty and Unmet Social Needs in Singapore”, the report is the first of its kind to be released in Singapore; it compiles information from a variety of sources  to present current data, analyses and debates regarding inequality and poverty in Singapore.

The handbook also provides an overview of publicly available information on existing social assistance policies and future policy options.

This publication presents the information from a neutral perspective, citing the sources of all arguments so that the reader has both a starting point to engage with these topics, and the information to pursue areas of interest further.

Dr Tan Chi Chiu, Chairman of the Lien Centre for Social Innovation, said, “There is growing public awareness and increasing government action to address the diverse needs of the diverse group of low-income Singaporeans. LCSI’s new handbook on domestic poverty, inequality and unmet social needs responds to calls from our partners and collaborators including Voluntary Welfare Organisations (VWOs), teachers, students, civil servants and community members for an accessible guide to the current context and debates.”

At a time when poverty, inequality and unmet social needs are hot topics of both global and domestic discussion, this handbook, written specifically for a Singaporean audience, is a timely contribution to the conversation. The handbook presents the framework of domestic debates and summarised information from key thinkers.

Key contributions of this handbook are an overview of existing literature on the following topics:
• Current estimates of inequality, absolute poverty and relative poverty in Singapore as well as discussions of the relevance of these indicators in the domestic context.
• Hypothesised causes of inequality and poverty in Singapore.
• The intersection between poverty and race, and poverty and gender in Singapore.
• Existing social assistance policies and programmes including CPF, Workfare, Public Assistance, and housing provided through the HDB.
• Suggested avenues for reform from various academic sources.

The authors of the handbook conclude that efforts to address poverty, inequality and unmet social needs in Singapore would be greatly enhanced by:
(a) the development of locally relevant and nuanced monetary and non-monetary measures of poverty that are made publicly available; and
(b) more sharing of disaggregated data from government studies and surveys.

These steps would enable academics, VWOs and the public at large become more aware of the issues related to poverty and inequality in Singapore, and be placed in a better position to weigh in on debates and solutions.

Mr Jonathan Chang, Centre Director of Lien Centre for Social Innovation, remarked, “This ground-breaking publication has been more than three years in the making, as we wanted to be sure that we found as much relevant material and spoke to as many people as we could to satisfy ourselves that we are presenting a balanced picture that represents different viewpoints.”

“Usually reports like this present one side or viewpoint. By taking the fresh approach of reviewing all the literature and policy information, the Lien Centre for Social Innovation has, I think, made possible more effective co-creation of responses whereby the community and government can work better together,” concluded Mr Tim Oei, Board Member of Lien Centre for Social Innovation, and Chief Executive Officer of AWWA.

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MDA: Abnormalizing the normal?

by Joshua Chiang “Homosexuality will eventually be accepted. It’s already accepted in…

文物局同意重设 四官方语言+日语解说樟宜二战纪念碑

我国前外交部长杨荣文,上月底在“新加坡透视”(Singapore Perspectives)论坛上发表讲话时说,他日前带印尼前外长马蒂到樟宜海滩,原本想向他介绍日据时期发生的“肃清大屠杀”历史,却发现原先有四种官方语文和日语的纪念碑,被只有英语的纪念碑取代。 杨荣文认为,这形同“刻意削砍掉我们的文化基因,否定我们自身的强项和宝贵遗产”,文化同质化的新加坡,将会是“非常不有趣”的新加坡。 他也指出,除了四语外加上日文解说,是因为让日本人知道这段历史,也是重要的。 杨荣文的反映也获得各家媒体跟进报导,《海时》在本月也18日的报导指出,在国内36个重要纪念碑、旅游景点和公共机构,至少有40巴仙并没有展示所有四大官方语言:中文、英语、马来语和淡米尔语。 对此本地语言历史学者陈丹枫,也认为坚持在公共地点使用四大官方语言的告示,乃是因为语言触及狮城所有国人的生活,也是确保我国不会失去多元语言特色的有效方法之一。 “当全球许多国家的语言也越趋多样化,我国应当反思是否值得反其道而行,走向语言同质化。” 显然国家文物局也听到了杨荣文等人的反映,在上周五于脸书回应,感谢杨荣文对樟宜海滩历史纪念碑的反馈。 “二战史是新加坡历史的重要部分。有鉴于他的显著意义,我们认同杨荣文先生的观点,这些历史景点纪念碑,都应以四大官方语言注释,加上日语,让国人和游客都能更好地了解、反思新加坡曾经经历过的那段战时历史。” 文物局也表示,会重新设计并树立有上述五种语言的纪念碑,以其在内容意义的呈现和方便阅读等实际考量取得平衡。与此同时,也寻求借助科技等其他方法,方便访客们获得更多有关这些历史景点的资讯。

Challenge of Attorney General’s discretion dismissed in capital offence case

~by: Ashok N~ The case of Ramalingam Ravinthran v Attorney-General (A-G) drew…

Changi Airport shuts a runway after spotting drone

After sighting an unauthorised drone at the vicinity of Changi Airport, a…