Nominated Member of Parliament Chia Yong Yong has ruffled some feathers with her remarks in Parliament – where she said she is “not entirely sure” if Singaporeans’ Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings belong to Singaporeans, or that they are “private money”.

Lest there be any doubt that CPF monies are indeed Singaporeans’ or CPF members’ money, here are 10 reasons to dispel such doubts.

1. Because Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-jin said so:

cpf

2. Because Government’s Factually website says so. And it must thus be a fact:

cpffact

3. Because the Ministry of Finance says so:

MOF CPF

4. Because the CPF Act says so. CPF Board is only the trustee and not the owner of the funds.

cpftrustee

5. Because WP MP Png Eng Huat says so.

pehcpf

6. Because NTUC chief Lim Swee Say says so:

lss

7. Because NMP Chia’s views are faulty:

cyy

If you deposit your money with the bank, the bank too “tops up” your savings with interests, but this does not mean your money has suddenly become the bank’s. It is still your money.

8. Because even when you are no longer around, your CPF funds will be distributed to your next of kins or your nominees.

cpfboard

9. Because newspapers say CPF is “Your CPF” and you decide what payout you want:

CPF Basic Retirement Sum

10. Because thousands of Singaporeans went to Hong Lim Park to ask for their CPF money to be returned to them.

returncpf

Let’s hope that settles it and no one will cast doubt on the ownership of CPF monies again!

Subscribe
Notify of
64 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NSP Malay Bureau’s 1st Anniversary celebration

~by: Ravi Philemon~ The National Solidarity Party’s (NSP) Malay Bureau today celebrated…

How much of my salary should I invest?

By SingSaver  Many Singaporeans want to know how much of their salary should…

It is sad and unbecoming that some people have chosen to cast aspersions on Pritam Singh’s intentions, says Dr Tan Cheng Bock

Leader of the Opposition (LO) Pritam Singh from the Workers’ Party (WP)…

马国媒体指百名马劳露宿街头 人力部强调雇主需提供住宿

上月22日,邻国马来西亚英语媒体《新海峡时报》(The New Straits Times)发表一篇文章《在新加坡的马来西亚籍街友》(Homeless Malaysians in Singapore)。 文章形容,一些马劳因疫情影响,新马边境关闭,有者被迫在公园长凳露宿、在公厕洗澡,甚至有时要饿肚子来节约开支。文章采访一名34岁名为沙鲁丁的男子,他告知记者,超过百名马劳无法负担房租而无家可归。作为家中唯一赚钱养家糊口的人,他们也不敢轻易放弃工作,再者返马隔离住宿开销逾2千令吉(约700新元)。 对于上述文章,人力部在昨日(3日)发表文告,指出该部在上月23及27日,联系了报导中的沙鲁丁以了解详情,但后者无法给出他们具体的姓名和联系方式,也承认未直接和员工交谈,以确认是否真的没有居所。 文告也指沙鲁丁澄清,并未告知《新海峡时报》“逾百名马劳露宿”,也不认识任何没有住所的马劳。 文告解释,狮城政府有跨机构的工作团队,由社会和家庭发展部、警察部队、人力部等组成。团队都会在全岛进行例行检查,若有街友都会转介到相关机构提供协助。 官员们在上月26日进行例行检查,到全国多处巡视至深夜,包括沙鲁丁列出的地点,但未找到有任何工作准证持有者露宿街头。…