dead fishes

By Terry Xu

In recent days, fish farmers off the coast of Pasir Ris have seen almost all their fish stocks die off. Death of the fish stock in alarming numbers started from 16 February and have persisted since.

The fish farmers have been working furiously for the past few weeks to salvage their fish farms, but the scene at the farms remains one of devastation, with a sea of dead fishes floating in the fishnets.

Many of the fish farmers have given up. Mr Philip Lim, a fish farmer and Chairman of Singapore Marine Aquaculture Cooperative lost $50,000 worth of his fish stock at his farm.

kelong 1979
Launch of commercial kelongs in 1979

The fish farmers were still recovering from the loss they incurred from the plankton bloom and oil spill incident last year. Mr Lim claims that the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) took no action to assist the fish farmers on taking preventive measures.

This was despite receiving a warning from Mr. Lim on 27 January this year. Mr Lim also said that apart from being nonchalant about the situation, AVA is also apathetic towards the plight of independent fish farmers.

Despite the massive losses incurred by fish farmers, they will still be expected to fulfill the quota of 17 tonnes fish product imposed upon by the AVA as a requirement to retain their license for fish farms.

Mr Lim recounted how the AVA still demanded the schedule of fish product fulfillment from the fish farmers, despite knowing that the some of the fish farmers had lost most, if not all, of their fish stocks in the February last year.

“It just took one night to wipe out the whole fish stock… even so, AVA still came to ask us for how much we will produce in April, June.” said Mr Lim.

In fact, this was the reason why Mr Lim brought a larger quantity of fishlings this year from overseas to rear, so as to meet the quota given.

The quota for the fish farms has remained unchanged since licensing began in 1979. The many changes in ecology and the environment since then have all influenced the sizes of fish stocks produced by fish farmers.

The percentage of the local demand provided by the fish farms has changed dramatically too. In the past, local fish farms and fishermen provided up to 70% of the fish supply. Today, that has dwindled down to just 5%.

There is also no protection for the local fish farmers. The AVA explained to the fish farmers that the reason behind this is Singapore’s emphasis on free trade.

“This is why industrial fishing companies come in and move out within a few years; it is just not profitable in the eyes of the big companies.” said Mr Lim.

After a similar incident last year, Minister of State for Defence and National Development, Dr Mohamad Maliki Bin Osman, spoke in Parliament about the revocation of fish farm licenses.

He said, “When we revoked licences recently, there were a lot of pleas from the fish farmers. We want to try to help the fish farmers. The first thing is to help them develop their systems as well as to be able to produce. Certainly, there are targets that have been set in place because we have very limited spaces. We have limited water and land spaces for farming activities. With the farmers, we have put in place opportunities for them to improve other productivity levels.”

“Yes, in a worst case scenario, we will revoke licenses for those who have failed to comply with the regulations we put in place, including those who fail to produce the kind of quantity that is required. The way to go right now is to help them. We want to help the farmers because this is their livelihood. We want to try to be sympathetic even for those who have recently suffered the mass fish deaths.”

Mr Maliki also stated, “So as much as we want to try to make them comply, we will take a very calibrated approach to support them. For those who have failed over several years and they have not been taking part in productivity movements, certainly we will look at the worst case scenario of revoking their licenses.”

“They don’t even bother to give some allowance for us, say one or two years to recover from our losses,” said Mr Lim. He stated that this is especially true for fish farmers who are not in the good books of the AVA. “I tried to plea for other farmers last year, but AVA did not care.”

“For many of the fish farmers, they are from the pioneer generation and all they know is how to fish. They cannot survive on land and get a job.” “We are being abused for many years… we are paid to be a slave, to give them production,” said Mr Lim on the AVA’s attitude towards fish farmers.

TOC has written to AVA for their response on Monday and will provide the AVA’s reply once we receive them.

[vimeo id=”120996399″ align=”center” mode=”normal”]
Subscribe
Notify of
68 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

警局外纵火 蒙面男子遭逮

昨晚(13日)11时许,明地迷亚一带陶纳路(Towner Road)组屋底层的邻里警察局外有人纵火、墙壁遭涂鸦,一名30岁蒙面男子随即被逮捕。 当地居民反映当时出现嘈杂声,一名男子对着火堆里投入燃烧罐,一度传来轻微爆炸声。甚至于附近墙上还有“ISIS”字眼的涂鸦,也能听到男子在叫嚷。 民防部队很快赶到扑灭火势,尽管事件中无人受伤,不过警方已逮捕有关男子调查。

陆续有学员怒斥遭一教练非礼! 瑜伽教室急灭火

本地瑜伽教室Trust Yoga爆出学生遭非礼丑闻,涉及一名瑜伽教练。虽然瑜伽教室尽快站出来“灭火”,甚至指涉案教练已寻求法律途径解决,但是在8月26日,再次有网民分享被非礼经过,甚至爆出涉案教练,还指教室管理层的处理方式非常让人不满。 自本月初有学生做出指控后,陆续有人挺身而出,分享他们在该瑜伽教室经历过的性侵事件。 瑜伽教室回应有关揭秘事件时表示,当局会根据学生的反馈和要求,跟新中心内的安全系统和标准作业程序。 一受害者于7月31日在推特上发帖,细说她于7月11日在Trust Yoga瑜伽教室上课时,遭涉案教官打了她的左臀部,抚摸她的私处和胯下约三秒。她当时正在倒立,即在进行一种将心脏高于头部的瑜伽动作时,遭到该教官如此对待。 据称,她事后曾向工作人员投诉,然而却被告知该教官并非首次这么做。而受害者的推特账户在之后,就转为仅供私人参阅。 受害者表示,她和父亲于12日回到瑜伽教室,和教师经营者商讨。但是,经营者表示首次听闻有关事件,并且会采取严厉行动。 惟,在8月2日,受害者在Instagram限时动态中分享到,涉案教练仍然被安排在8月3日至9日的一周瑜伽课程中。 瑜伽教室增设CCTV Trust Yoga瑜伽教室于8月3日在脸书发声明,表示当局已知晓有关的非礼案指控,涉案教官也同意在当局进行内部调查期间停工休假。…

Seniors and students prefer cheaper transportation fares; working adults opt for reliability, says NUS study on public transport

According to a study done by the National University of Singapore (NUS)…