EIU logoSingapore remains the most expensive city to live in, says the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) in its 2015 Worldwide Cost of Living Report, which means the city state has topped the EIU charts for the past two years.

The EIU study compares the cost of more than 160 services and products including food, clothing and utility bills.

Singapore was found to be 11% more expensive than New York for basic groceries, and its prices for clothes was noted to be “50% higher than New York”, the EIU reported.

“Most significantly, Singapore’s complex Certificate of Entitlement system makes car prices excessive, with Singaporean transport costs almost three times higher than in New York.”

Nevertheless, the EIU noted that Zurich and Geneva might actually be more expensive than Singapore to live in, had it factored in the recent increase in the value of the Swiss franc after Switzerland unpegged its currency from the Euro.

The other cities to top the charts were Paris, Oslo, Zurich and Sydney – meaning the ranking remains the same since last year, which the EIU described as unusual given worldwide drops in oil prices.

The Worldwide Cost of Living is a twice yearly Economist Intelligence Unit survey that compares more than 400 individual prices across 160 products and services. These include food, drink, clothing, household supplies and personal care items, home rents, transport, utility bills, private schools, domestic help and recreational costs.

The survey itself is a purpose-built internet tool designed to help human resources and finance managers calculate cost-of-living allowances and build compensation packages for expatriates and business travellers.

Subscribe
Notify of
46 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Government to pass $280 million in GST Vouchers – Cash Special Payment in November 2017

Ministry of Finance (MOF) has announced that about 1.37 million Singaporeans are eligible for $280…

Ofo faces suspension by LTA for unable to reduce deployed bicycles and managing QR code parking system

Chinese bike-sharing operator Ofo has breached multiple regulatory requirements set by the…

Malaysia’s Transport Ministry “prepared to release letters” regarding ILS, says Minister Anthony Loke

Singapore’s Transport Ministry (MOT) has been criticised by its Malaysian counterpart for…

留澳物理治疗师刚回国 拒戴口罩妇面四控状

曾于周日(5月3日)在顺福熟食中心,因拒绝戴口罩而和民众起争执的40岁妇女,今天(5月5日)在法庭面对四项控状,分别是违反冠状病毒19(临时措施)法令的三项控状,以及一项公共滋扰罪。 被告峇任婕(Paramjeet Kaur)上周日(5月3日)到顺福熟食中心用餐,被一名豆干小贩的女儿提醒戴口罩后,反应激烈骂对方多管闲事而起争执。 警方受询时证实接获民众投报,指有人在顺福熟食中心没戴口罩而和他人起争执。警方于昨晚9时,依据违反阻断措施法令和造成公共自然的罪名,将被告逮捕归案,还押至今。 据被告母亲表示,女儿是本地出生长大,一直到20岁从理工学院毕业后,到澳大利亚深造,并担任物理治疗师。去年才返回我国。 然而,一旦违反了阻断措施法令,罚款将不超过1万元,或监禁不超过六个月,或两者兼施;若公共滋扰罪成,则有可能面对不超过2000元的罚款。 被告今午是通过视像系统“出庭”面控,穿着黑色上衣并戴着蓝色口罩,但是在审讯过程中,她多次把口罩拉下。 她在庭上并未表明是否认罪,但是控方要求将被告还押到心理卫生学院两周,已进行心理评估。法官同意控方要求,将案件展延道5月19日过堂。 峇任婕曾于4月14日早上9时25分,在顺福熟食中心内享用糯米饭时,因没戴口罩被警员提醒,岂止她反而拿起手机反拍。 她的举动被旁人拍下后,上传到社交媒体上,引起网民谴责。