NSP in Tampines
Mr Tan Lam Siong (centre) meeting residents in Tampines (image – NSP Facebook page)

While supporting a number of the initiatives from Budget 2015, the National Solidarity Party (NSP) called for the government to make several improvements to ensure that the elderly receive assistance urgently, reduce overall cost of living rather than provide subsidies, and focus on base issues such as rentals for businesses and social costs of policies.

The NSP welcomes the measures to provide greater financial support and assistance to the elderly, families and the working class,” wrote NSP’s secretary-general Tan Lam Siong in a statement issued to media. “However, it has certain reservations and sentiments about some of the measures and the overall impact of the budget.”

Mr Tan called for the payouts for the Silver Support Scheme, which represent a lifeline to many of the poorest
elderly, to “take effect without any delay” instead of kicking on only at the first quarter of next year, for payouts to be made every month instead of every three months, and for means-testing to be done away with.

While applauding the increase in income taxes for top earners as a positive step towards income redistribution, NSP also asked the government to address the real issues that affect the costs of living for lower and middle income groups.

“Whilst top-ups, rebates, waivers and concessions are good as they always provide a welcomed reprieve for the ordinary citizen, they are often treated as government “hand-outs”. By their very nature, government handouts are not permanent and are invariably subject to conditions. Further, government handouts often invite public suspicions of the motivations behind them, especially in or approaching an election year.”

“NSP believes that the need for government handouts would be greatly diminished if substantive measures are taken to effectively lower the cost of living such as reducing indirect taxes like the Goods and Services Tax. In this vein, the increase in petrol duty is a completely misguided. Such a move unwittingly adds to the woes of the lower income group that the budget seeks to help.”

Another measure proposed was to assist local businesses by lowering rental, which the government can take the lead with as it can “lower rent substantially for properties that are owned by the government or
government-linked companies”, which Mr Tan said will help to save jobs for low and middle-income
families.

NSP highlighted areas of expenditure which it deemed excessive and have also led to a greater deficit in Budget 2015, such as  investments in Changi Airport, national defence, the SG50 National Day parade, SouthEast Asian Games and the Asean Para Games.

“As a matter of principle in spending taxpayers’ monies, NSP would like to urge the government to exercise greater frugality whenever possible and to curb wastages and excesses so that more funds can be channelled to help lower the cost of living for the low and middle income groups and to provide a stronger social safety network
for those in need.”

Mr Tan also called for changes to the transportation system to help low- and middle-income earners, such as reducing the cost of Certificate of Entitlements (COE) for motorcycles, and removing evening Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) charges to encourage families to have dinners together.

NSP also called for the government to implement education policies that pursue knowledge for the love of knowledge, including a a thorough review of scholarships and bursaries given to foreign students.

“Overall, the budget demonstrates a greater sensitivity on the part of the government to the needs of the elderly and the working class. However, the measures only reach out to their needs on a superficial level and do not address the substantive causes of their predicaments.”

“NSP hopes that government budgets will take into greater consideration the social costs and impact on the people. The ‘opposition effect’ may or may not have contributed to a greater leaning towards social welfare for Singaporeans. Whatever it may be, greater economic success for Singapore should not mean even higher costs of living. It should bring about not only a better standard of living but also a higher quality of life for our people.”

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

接保护令和停止发布令 网友申诉遭下雪对付

网红“下雪”郑彦彦再出招,网友在推文上指收到下雪(郑彦彦)代表律师的文件,指下雪已成功申请了“加速保护令”(Expedited Protection Order)。 署名 @elouease的网友于昨午(9月24日)在推特帖文,分享以上事件。然而,他并没有叙说更多的详情,仅指出他作为一名没有法律经验的21岁学生,在面对这么多的文件和法庭命令,并不是一件令人愉快的经历。 数天后,网友再次接到另一份文件,指下雪已经成功对他申请了“临时停止发布令”(Interim Stop Publication Order)。 网友之后委托了图莱辛甘律师事务所(Eugene Thuraisingam LLP),以解决这两个问题。他在帖文中也指出,很感谢图莱辛甘为他无偿辩护。…

The orchid Singapore has named after David Cameron is the colour of a rival party

Singapore has long had the practice of naming cross-bred orchids after celebrities…

经两日朝野激辩 72票赞成9票反对 国会通过《防假消息法》

经过两天的激辩,国会在昨日晚上10时20分结束前,以72票赞成,九票反对,三票弃权,三读通过《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》。 人民行动党72议员投下赞成票,工人党的六名议员:毕丹星、林瑞莲、刘程强、方荣发、陈硕茂和费沙,三名非选区议员:贝理安、吴佩松和陈立峰则投下反对票。 至于先前一再呼吁《防假消息法》需进行修改的三名官委议员:特斯拉副教授、王丽婷和郭秀钦,则在他们对法案修改的建议未被采纳后,在三读时投弃权票。 多位议员在两日的辩论,相续对《防假消息法》提出观点,其中也包括质疑何以新法赋予部长取缔假信息的权力,以及为何绕过司法审讯,由部长先行裁决假消息并采取行动。 在进行辩论总结时,尚穆根则强调假消息可能在短时间内迅速传播,威胁社会安全或引起经济动荡。 至于授权不同部长的原因是,一些假消息课题可能涉及不同部门或专业领域,为此让有关部门部长直接作出决定。他们也必须为他们的决定面对挑战和质疑。 回应刘程强“先斩后奏” :“头没断,手还在” 有议员建议将假信息的取缔权交给第三方,尚穆根表示,这么做是将政府应对假信息后果的职责,以及取缔假信息的权力分割开来,会削弱执行效率。 昨日刘程强以“先斩后奏”,比喻法案赋予部长的先行独断权,尚穆根则回应,即便部长发出更正指示,发帖者原文都还在“头没断,手还在”,还能继续用键盘打字、也能作出上诉。 刘程强则回应,假设部长认为某涉事者涉传播假消息,部长可直接做决定,可以发出更正或撤下文章的指示,部长已经先行做决定,为何不算“先斩后奏”? “涉事者虽然之后可以到法庭申诉,但事实就是,他得先遵从部长的命令。”…

ICA: Expect longer waiting time at the checkpoints on Thursday to Tuesday

Traffic through the Tuas and Woodlands checkpoints is expected to build up…