HDB representative
HDB officer speaking to flat buyers at Fernvale Link

 

The Housing and Development Board (HDB) said in a statement on 23 February that it will not be able to accede to the request by flat buyers affected by the Seng Kang columbarium incident to cancel their Built-To-Order flat bookings with a full refund of payment.

It also said flat buyers who wish to cancel their application before signing the Agreement for Lease will have the paid option fee forfeited, while cancelling the application after the signing of the agreement will result in flat owners forfeiting the 5 per cent of purchase price of the booked flat.

HDB said that as of 9 February, it had received a total of 95 requests from BTO flat buyers out of the 4,000 units located near the three BTO projects at Fernvale Link to cancel their bookings with refund.

Earlier in December 2014, many of the Fernvale Lea’s future residents were alarmed to know from news that their estate or soon-to-be-completed homes are to be situated next to a Chinese temple, which would house a columbarium within its premises.

This led to the Member of Parliament of Sengkang West, Dr Lam Pin Min to hold a dialogue session with the affected residents to answer their questions. But Dr Lam was subsequently lambasted by residents and netizens for taking side on the URA, HDB and Life Corporation Pte Ltd, the commercial entity which subsidiary company, Eternal Pure Land Pte Ltd won the tender.

Minister of National Development, Khaw Boon Wan said earlier in Parliament on 29 January that the site was not meant for a commercial columbarium and that the ministry had assumed that the commercial entity was a religious one. He said that his ministry will ensure the tender site at Sengkang is restored to the original plan of a Chinese temple.

letter from HDB cancel flat2
Letter from HDB to flat owners

HDB said these flat buyers will have till 27 February to inform the housing board of their final decision on the cancellation of their flat application.

Some buyers have already since said that they will be collecting their keys as HDB has refused their request.

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PM Lee comes under fire for controversial remarks

After creating controversy last month by describing some Singaporeans as “a disgrace…

LTA steps up action against evasion of toll payment and fees at Woodlands

Land Transport Authority LTA issued a press release on Monday (July 25)…

疫情曝露退休人士收入不足问题 民主党倡议设基本收入制

民主党认为,当前的冠病19疫情,也曝露了年长者、退休人士面对的显著问题,以及年轻打工一族的财务负担。该党呼吁冠病疫情后,让年长者过上有保障的生活尤为重要。 在最新的文告中,民主党献议应让65岁或以上的新加坡公民,确保80巴仙低收入阶层,至少能获得基本500元收入。 2019年5月,光耀公共政策学院(LKYSPP)曾发表一项研究报告,指出65岁及以上的单身男性或女性,每月的生活消费至少需要1千379元。 而2019年家庭支出调查显示,居住在组屋内的退休家庭,每月平均收入均需1千522元,但其中平均280元是出自公积金,其余则需仰赖子女或亲人。 对此,民主党认为,这也无形中也加重这些年长者子女的经济负担。再者遗憾的是,现有公积金政策也未能解决退休人士收入不足的问题。 该党倡议”年长者退休收入计划“(RISE),认为需透过立法保障退休阶层的收入稳定。这是因为当前的”建国一代“、”立国一代“等配套都是临时性的,并不是长远的退休规划。 民主党指出,上述退休收入也是现金支付,有别于当前的建国一代、立国一代配套,透过为健保储蓄等方式套现。再者,退休人士手上有固定收入,也能减轻在职子女为年迈父母提供经济支持的压力。

洞察行动党政策疏漏、勇于发声者 都被对付

源自作者人权律师张素兰 本周二(22日),我和数位友人一同在金文泰警局外,等候《新叙事》创办人覃炳鑫。他日前因涉嫌在未经授权下发布与选举相关的付费广告而助理选举官通报,警方随后也传唤他。我们无法得知何时被举报。 根据本月18日选举局的声明(选举过了的两个月后),大选期间,脸书接到通知需撤下五个与选举相关的“付费广告”。这些广告费共花了341元。覃炳鑫说,这些广告只是为了推广其中的帖文,包括一视频内有性感的声音重复“自由裁量权”(discretion)。 然而,总理公署似乎仍不满足于撤下五个付费广告。在他们获得压倒性胜利后的两个月(即93席位中赢得83席),现在开始向覃炳鑫追责。 张素兰:大选大获全胜,为何仍“赶尽杀绝”? 为何人民行动党表现地如此不合常理和充满报复性,耗费公帑调查这类琐事。即使所有的“广告”被法院认定为非法选举活动(这是不太可能的),对选举又有何用?人民行动党不能滥用纳税人的钱来满足他们的自大。 大部分的人甚至都没见过或听说过这些所谓的“广告”。我必须承认,其中一视频在选举期间出现,确实提及“自由裁量权”一词,而且是个精准的讽刺。但我也必须说,我并没有见过其余四个广告,即使我也是一名《新叙事》的订阅者。 即使如此,人民行动党在大选中的压倒性胜利,足以证明广告并未对结果有任何影响,其影响甚至是微乎其微,那为什么总理公署不让事情就这么算了? 我只得出一个结论。 这是行动党身上不幸和令人悲伤的特征。他致力于保障自身的利益和生存,不顾国人权益,即便他们希望享有一些基本人权如言论自由。行动党希望不惜一切代价维护权力。 因此,众所周知,他们被戏称为“霸凌者”。人民行动党必须确保所有能够看见他们政策漏洞,或是勇敢发声的人,都遭到对付(put down)。这是新加坡的悲哀。为什么我们的政府必须要肆意破坏这些有才能的新加坡人?…