No Musical Instruments

The following is a Facebook page posting by Mr Mohan, also known as “King Chola Hercules”, who says he was one of the three men arrested for the scuffle during a Thaipusam procession in Serangoon Road on Tuesday.

In his note, which he said was “to let the public know my point of view” about the incident, Mr Mohan says the accusation that the three arrested were drunk was not true, and that the claim that they were the ones playing the musical instruments was also untrue.

Here is Mr Mohan’s Facebook posting in full:

Dear everyone,

For the past three days, there had been various reports, news & articles with regards to the 3 men arrested for the incident that happened at Thaipusam 2015. I am one of the 3 men who were arrested at the incident. This post would be my part of the story, not to justify what I have done, but to let the public know my point of view.

My cousin brother was one of the kavadi bearers in Thaipusam. The first time we were approached was at the Perumal temple by the temple officials. They ordered the “Urumi group” boys who were playing the “Thavil(indian traditional instrument)” to stop playing the music. We seeked their cooperation and understanding to allow the boys to play the thavil while he was piercing the 108 spikes, this was so that he can be distracted from the pain.

My brother was carrying a traditional kavadi which weighed roughly about 100kg, therefore he needed to be distracted from the pain as well as the piercings. However, the temple officials were adamant about not letting the urumi boys play while he was piercing. When we asked why they could not let the boys play, they replied that these were regulations set by the SPF, and that they were merely following SPF’s orders. We then abided to their rules and regulations and asked the Urumi boys to stop the music.

We then left the Perumal temple, and started the holy procession in a very solemn manner. The urumi group we hired did not play any music as they were sent off by the higher officials and were not allowed to follow my brother’s kavadi. However, as we approached Kitchener Road, the urumi group boys joined us again. They were playing music for us and followed us till Desker Road.

At Desker Road, the urumi boys were then pulled aside again, aggressively this time, by the temple officials . My cousin brother who observed the situation went in to mediate as those urumi boys were engaged and paid by us. He questioned those who pulled the boys away on why they were being pulled away, and that these boys were engaged by us. He argued with them asking why weren’t we allowed to play the Urumi & Thavil which are traditional indian instruments. It was emphasized in the media that we were the one playing the instruments at the procession.

However, the truth is, we paid and hired a urumi group to play music for my brother’s kavadi. There were about 15 to 20 temple officials and blue uniformed (unable to identify whether they were police or certis cisco in the chaotic situation) men who were involved in the argument. Suddenly, there were a group of guys (about 20-30 guys) who barged in and started manhandling us, trying to push us away from the urumi group. I noticed that my cousin brother was manhandled, being pulled by his tshirt to and fro to a corner, and i also saw his wife was running behind him, trying to pull the husband away from them. A group of men were pushing me and trying to bring me to the ground violently.

At the point of time, I noticed my sister-in-law being pushed to the ground, that was when I got agitated and aggravated and I rushed towards my sister in law. From my point of view, the person who pushed my sister in law was wearing a white tshirt. I broke free from the group of men, and I punched him, thats when10 men pinned me down on the road aggressively, suffocating me. They kneed and backheeled me on my face, and said “you dare to punch a police officer”. That was when I realised this group of men were police officers. We were then brought back to the station.

It was stated in all the reports and media news that “3 men were arrested and they smelled strongly of alcohol”. I would like to clarify this statement because this is not the truth at all. I do not consume alcohol AT ALL. There were tonnes of other people at that chaotic situation, & the alcohol smell could have came from anyone at all. So it was wrong for them to have accused us of being drunk and creating nuisance. How could media like “Channel NewsAsia, Vasantham Tamil News, Straits times etc” publish in their news that I was drunk and creating nuisance. Under what basis or what proof did they release this news? Was the conclusion that we were drunk based on the report giving by the SPF?

Secondly, how can a policeman (whose identity was later revealed) push a woman down to the ground? Isn’t it a violent act against a woman (under the woman’s charter)?Why is it that in all the media, this action of the police force was not justified? In my point of view, this is not the behaviour of a police officer, but it is more of a rowdy act. My nephew and niece who witnessed the whole incident were traumatised and could not stop crying. In that chaotic situation, it did not hit my mind that it was a police officer who behaved such.

Also in the statement provided by Minister S ISWARAN in the article “S ISWARAN: PLEASE DON’T OVERREACT ABOUT THE THAIPUSAM INCIDENT posted on 5 Feb 2015 in “The Real Singapore”, “He acknowledged that three people were arrested at the Thaipusam procession on Tuesday for playing drums.” My question to you is Sir, How could you have acknowledge a statement which was not true? We were not drummers or we were not playing the instruments. All instruments were played by the Urumi group we hired.

Thirdly, the root cause to all this chaos was the playing of traditional indian instruments, such as Urumi and Thavil. Being the organizers of Thaipusam, the Hindu Endowment Board should stand up for the Indians and justify the playing of indian traditional instruments for a holy procession. I voiced out to the officials that if Lion Dance are allowed for chinese events and kompangs are allowed for malay events, why aren’t Indians allowed to play our traditional instruments. I did not mean it as a racial remark, but just as a comparison. But I was labelled a racist, giving racist remarks, which is again a false accusation.

In summary, this is my point of view. I am not here to justify my actions, but just to create awareness amongst the public who had been giving different stories everyday. It is NOT TRUE that I was drunk during this chaos as mentioned in all the official news reports. In my opinion, I feel Hindu Endowment Board is not deemed fit to represent us, Indians. They do not know what are our needs, and I believe they could have handled the situation better, and giving us proper explanations when we questioned them, and not pushing the blame to the police and the Govt.

It is heartwarming to see people from the public coming forward to give their opinion and feedback about the whole situation. I believe they are entitled to their freedom of the speech and should not be questioned or interrogated by any of the higher officials

Thank you for taking the time to read through this post.

Regards,
Mohan.

Subscribe
Notify of
45 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Family of otters spotted trying to cross road in Central Business District during morning rush hour

Why did the otters cross the road? To get to the otter…

王乙康:防大专校园传染,限制学生之间接触与交流

为防止武汉冠状病毒的传染,本地高等学府限制学生之间的接触与交流,确保校园能够继续运作。 日前,本地大学已取消50人以上的大型讲堂课和活动,并改以线上教学。 教育部长王乙康今日(26日)在国会答复官委议员伊萨德(Mohamed Irshad)的提问。后者询问政府目前采取什么行动控制局势,以及高等学府师生扮演的角色等。 他表示课程仍照常继续,但出席人数缩小,高等学府会确保出席讲堂课、辅导课和活动的学生人数不超过50人。 另外,各所高等学府也会在现有课程中推出涵盖冠状病毒内容的全面防卫教材。 两周前,王乙康接受媒体采访时曾表示,尽管当前新型冠状病毒疫情逐渐增加,但暂无计划停课。 王乙康表示,工艺教育学院将率先在本月推出全面防卫教材,而理工学院则会在4月推出相关教材。至于大学则会选择在适当时候再推出。

调查统计:约千人仍露宿街头 近六成受访者有工作

仍有1000人在新加坡流落街头,大部分均为50岁以上在职的人,而且有31巴仙接受社工采访的街友反映,他们已露宿长达六年或更久,其中有四名街友已超过20年。 据国立大学法学院周五公布的调查发现,目前狮城流落街头者仍有约千人,大部分街友的分布不均,在市区、勿洛和加冷的组屋底层 和商业大楼。 统计显示,被发现在市区露宿的街友为241人;其次是勿洛和加冷,个别为74和55人;其余则分别散布在皇后区、榜鹅、武吉班让、三巴旺。 “尽管许多社会议题已逐渐被关注,但新加坡的街友人口一直被忽视,因此以系统和较透明度的方式计算街友人口,能够为我们提供更适合的政策和服务给街友”。 李光耀公共政策學院助理教授黄国和表示,这并非是首次以计算街友人口为主的一项调查。2017年3月,他以时间点统计街友人口,并在5小时内发现了180名街友,而且在最后的统计时,共发现了921至1050 街友。 令人意外的是,其中六成的人表示自己正在就业,如清洁工或兼职,不到一半的人固定月入560元至3000元不等。其余则表示是获得每周20元至600元不等。此外,其中35人表示自己是有组屋或租屋,但由于各种理由如家庭冲突、与租客相处不佳或不想给亲人带来不便等,才会开始流浪。 在调查过程中,有88名街友愿意接受背景调查。当中可得知尽管大部分没有固定收入,但有三成的人透露自己获得了公众援助、公积金或家人的支持,每月会有平均80元至570元的收入。 建议取消租赁组屋合租需求 黄国和称,目前社会给予街友的服务仍然有限,鉴于街友的隐蔽特性,必须扩大外展服务,将街友联系起来。 他也建议,建屋局应改善租赁祖屋计划的条件与空间规定,例如取消共同租凭的要求。…

Yong Vui Kong: MARUAH sends appeal to the President

Please see below for an appeal letter from MARUAH to President S.R.…