By Humanitarian Organization for Migration Economics (H.O.M.E.)

Thirty year old Khairul has been working in Singapore since 2009. The oldest son in the household, he left his home in Bangladesh and came to Singapore in hopes of making money to support his family. He has one older sister and three younger brothers. On the 30th of April in 2014, Khairul arrived in Singapore to start a new job. Khairul’s work involved the installation of smoke detectors. He worked from May to July in 2014. To his dismay, he was not paid his salary. He was owed approximately $3,900.

khairul

On the 1st of August 2014, he lodged a complaint with Ministry of Manpower (MOM). His case was brought to the Labour Court. These legal proceedings continued all the way until the 6th of January 2015. These five months were hard for Khairul. Since his work permit had been cancelled, he was issued a special pass and not allowed to work in Singapore.

Unfortunately, Khairul’s case at the Labour Court was dismissed on the 6th of January 2015. His employer had produced signed salary vouchers and witnesses who claimed that they had seen Khairul receive his salary. Claiming the salary vouchers had been forged and witnesses pressured into submitting false statements, Khairul decided to study the possibility of filing an appeal to the High Court.

The law entitles a worker to file an appeal to the High Court within 2 weeks upon the judgment issued by the Labour Court. For Khairul, this would be on the 20th of January 2015. Within these two weeks, Khairul had to seek advice on the matter and find a legal representative who would submit the appeal on his behalf. He told his employer of his intentions to file an appeal.

Despite that, his employer bought an airplane ticket for Khairul to return home on the 14th of January. A special pass expiring on that date was also issued by MOM. Without a work permit or a special pass permitting his stay in Singapore, he would have to leave Singapore and be unable to file his appeal to the High Court. In effect, the window for his appeal submission had been halved.

HOME assisted him to request an extension of his stay in Singapore to MOM, so that he would have sufficient time to consider an appeal to the High Court; but this request was rejected. Even though he has the right to file an appeal, he could not do so because the Ministry of Manpower did not legalise his stay in Singapore and insisted he depart the country . No reason was given.

With his hands tied and still desiring to submit an appeal, Khairul remained in Singapore. As a result of overstaying his special pass, Khairul was fined $100. HOME assisted him to procure the financial resources to find his own way back home. He was unable to file an appeal with the High Court.

This article was first published on HOME’s blog

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Kwong Wai Shiu – 100 years old but will it survive?

One hundred years ago, in 1910, a group of Cantonese merchants founded…

贝理安对话行动党支持者 承诺对选民会一视同仁

工人党阿裕尼集选区候任议员贝理安,分享近日在实龙岗走访时,与人民行动党支持者对话,并表示最大的危险并非是两党间的竞争,而是新加坡人出于政治冷漠,因缺乏知情、恐惧而一直选择同一政党。 贝理安于昨日(26日)在脸书上发文分享近日在走访实龙岗时遇到人民行动党支持者,该名支持者也表达自己的心声,指不愿见新加坡陷入冲突和对抗中。 贝理安也非常耐心向他阐述自己的政治信念。 “首先,我认同她的政治信念和诚实,若能够拥有自己的政治理念是一件好事,这是身为一名公民最重要的角色。” 随后,他也强调,冷漠才是新加坡最大的危机,因此他也呼吁新加坡人应该能够拥有自己对政治的理念,投向自己认为对新加坡最有效的政党。 “工人党和人民行动党面临最大的危机不是对手,而是新加坡人对政治冷漠,这种冷漠能够导致人民在冷漠、恐惧和惰性下,无法做出谨慎、知情的选择,而只选择某一党。” 其次,贝理安也强调工人党的政治理念,工人党的宗旨是将新加坡人摆在首位,而不是为了反对而反对的政党。 他说,“我们非常珍惜新加坡的民主团结和和谐的决心。我们力求提高政府的透明度和问责制;对政府未来的所有可能性进行审查,防止政府滥权;向执政党提供替代性政策;建立替代性方案取代一党执政,确保新加坡能够持续得到保障,就算人民行动党失败了。” 最后,贝理安也向该名支持者承诺,工人党将会对选民一视同仁,无论是持有不同政治信念的支持者。 他也指出,“当时我们确实花了一些时间交流,我也鼓励他如果有什么需要,可以随时联络我。女士,我希望你正在阅读这篇帖文,希望我们能够持续保持联络,祝你身体健康。” 工人党在今年的大选中,以59.93巴仙对40.07打败人民行动党,守住阿裕尼集选区。

Stop the wayang, just return our CPF!

More twist and turns have appeared in the CPF Life scheme. Ng E Jay.

YOG volunteer questions sincerity of YOG committee

The following is a letter to TOC by Amanda Lee, a volunteer…