election department

The Elections Department has announced through a press release on Monday (2 Feburary) that the registers of electors is to be updated no later than 30 April.

This revision was directed by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong through the permanent secretary of the Prime Minister Office.

The last update to the registers was in March last year.

In order to qualify as an elector, a person has to be a Singapore Citizen and 21 years old and above as of 1 February, and not disqualified as an elector under any written law.

In addition, the person must have a Singapore residential address registered with the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority as of 1 February so that his or her name can be entered or retained in the register for a constituency.

The Elections Department will be providing more details on how Singaporeans can check the registers in the later part of February.

notice to electoral

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Diplomatic row between SG and UK after 24 strokes of caning for Briton found guilty of repeated drug offences

A diplomatic row between longtime allies Singapore and the United Kingdom (UK)…

Prison Run 2019 participant slams Yellow Ribbon Project Singapore for their “hypocritical” take on anti-death penalty

On Thursday (12 September), Mohammad Nafiz Kamarudin, founder of non-profit organisation Happy…

Amos Yee assaulted right outside of state court

Amos Yee, the teenager who is being charged with harassment, and with deliberately wounding…

“捍卫自由律师团”提告尚穆根 遭马国高庭撤销

马国高庭撤销当地人权律师组织“捍卫自由律师团”,对我国内政部长尚穆根提出的告诉。此前,尚穆根曾援引援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),下令更正有关“捍卫自由律师团”的一篇文章。 今年1月16日,“捍卫自由律师团”发表一则声明,指责樟宜监狱以残酷和不合法方式处决囚犯。 内政部驳斥相关内容,并强调政府不遗余力确保执法严格遵守法律程序,而执刑也都有监狱长或一名医生在场等。尚穆根更于22日援引 《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法令》,对该组织发出更正指令,并称文章内容不属实驳斥相关内容。 1月24日,“捍卫自由律师团”入禀法庭,要求马国法院裁决,尚穆根无法用防假消息法,对身在马国的“捍卫自由律师团”采取行动。该组织认为,此举如同把欺压性质的打假新闻法令,也对马国的言论伸出触角。 新加坡内政部今日(1日)也发布文告,该组织虽然提告尚穆根,但后续却未向他发出诉讼令状。反观该法庭文件也过期,而“捍卫自由律师团”也停止更新相关申请。有鉴于此,马国高庭上周一(21日)撤销了相关告诉。 文告指出,“捍卫自由律师团”曾指出将会提供证据证明,但却尚未有任何行动,基于该组织并未采取后续法律行动,因此足以证明目前所采取的法律行动是毫无根据的。