ravi and roy

The court has ruled that Roy Ngerng to pay S$29,000 in total for legal fees and filing cost to PM Lee’s lawyer for summary judgment ruling on the defamation suit between Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Roy Ngerng.

Mr Ngerng, is being sued by Mr Lee in his personal capacity for a series of articles which had accused Mr Lee of “criminal misappropriation” of Singaporeans’ Central Provident Fund (CPF) monies, said Mr Lee’s lawyers, by comparing the management of CPF monies by the Government Investment Corporation of Singapore – or GIC Pte Ltd – with the corruption trial of leaders of the City Harvest Church.

The High Court had allowed summary judgement against Blogger, Roy Ngerng Yi Ling on 7 November last year.

In the closed-door court hearing on Monday (12 January) to determine the costs on the summary judgement, Lawyer Davinder Singh S.C. had initially asked the Court to award $49,027.61 which include for filing fees.

The lawyers representing Mr Ngerng had offered S$13,000 instead.

Davinder Singh argued that their lawyers have done “additional” work because they had to research where the articles by Roy Ngerng were republished, and had to prove that people downloaded and accessed the article, so that they could show the extent of damage that was done.

He also said that Roy Ngerng had made the matter “unnecessarily complicated” because Roy knew he was wrong but made the prime minister to prove that he is not, so there was also “additional” work that the legal team had to do.

The PM’s lawyers added that in their application for an injunction to stop Mr Ngerng from publishing or disseminating allegations that Mr Lee is guilty of criminal misappropriation of the monies paid by Singaporeans to the Central Provident Funds, or any words or images to the same effect.

The lawyer argued that as Mr Ngerng was not willing to accept the injunction, the legal team had to do “additional” work to prove that Mr Ngerng should be given an injunction from speaking on the matter.

M Ravi, representing lawyer for Roy Ngerng defended by saying that Ngerng had not submitted any frivolous defense and therefore should be charged with the standard rate.

Justice Lee Seiu Kin ultimately ruled that the total costs to be paid by Mr Ngerng to the the lawyers of PM Lee be fixed at S$20,000 for the summary judgement with an additional $9,000 for filing costs.

[youtube id=”ymRzIQ99Rnc” align=”center” mode=”normal”]

M Ravi said to reporters that his team is very gratified on the outcome of the hearing. “I must say that the judge was extremely fair in the assessment of the case as well as the delivery of his judgement.”

Assessment of damages to be held over 4 days

Hearing of the assessment of damages for the defamation is expected to take place over 4 continuous days in late June, with cross examination of all witnesses in open Court.

PM Lee is said to be taking the stand as a witness in court as the court did not approve the request by Davinder Singh to have witnesses not to turn up in court.

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

网传假文告《海时》误报 马希盟秘书处澄清:没针对努鲁言论发声明

马来西亚公正党有“烈火莫熄”公主之称的努鲁依莎,在政坛抛下震撼弹,直言对希盟政府改革缓慢感到失望,也表明来届选举将不参选。 努鲁伊莎是安华长女,已担任了三届国会议员。但是他在去年12月12月辞去公正党副主席和槟城州主席职务后,再于昨天宣布辞去国会公共账目委员会成员一职。 努鲁伊莎此前接受《海峡时报》专访,曾坦言对现有政局的忧虑,人民日渐走向两极化,尤其是在希盟执政后,大马政治逐渐分裂成自由派和右派,中庸派无立足之地。 对于不再参选她并未透露原因,但相信是对希盟执政后的发生的种种事件感到不满。 网传假文告称希盟续支持敦马领导 不过,昨日网络流传一则“希盟秘书处”的文告,指希盟盟党秘书针对努鲁伊莎接受新加坡媒体访问,其中所提及对马国政局的言论发表声明。 假文告内容提及,希盟秘书处关注努鲁在访谈中提及,希盟执政一年仍“混乱和充满挑战”,希盟虽然欢迎党内人士和支持者的批评,不过这些意见也必须有建设性。 该文告也强调将继续支持敦马的领导。署名处包括秘书长赛夫丁、公正党总秘书拿督斯里赛夫丁、土团党总秘书慕克力、诚信党总秘书安努亚达希和行动党组织秘书陆兆福名字的文告。 据了解,当地英语和马来媒体都率先在新闻网站报导了此声明,我国英媒《海峡时报》也有跟进。 对此,希盟总秘书赛夫丁则在昨日于推特发表简短声明,指出:“有关希盟秘书处于今日发出的文告,我谨此通知有关文告无效。就目前为止,我们未发表任何声明。” 再者,文告中的职称也有误,把土团党署理主席拿督慕克力列为该党总秘书。 Berkaitan…

AHPETC to directly manage TC, rebuts Gov’t allegations in letter to residents

The Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC), run by the Workers’ Party, “will…

MOM refutes claims by Laura over its slow response to her emails for help; withdraws mention of her real name

The claim that no one from the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) replied…