scene of accident

Help!!! Calling for eye witnesses! A car collided with my motorbike headon as it drove against the traffic. I received a letter from Traffic Police saying that it is unable to “conclusively determine who is the party responsible for the accident”.

A desperate cry for help to testify as witness by Ms Tong who was unfortunately knocked down in her motorbike by a car which was travelling in the wrong lane of traffic.

On 5 January, 2015 at around 4.15 to 4.30 pm, Ms Tong was turning right in her motorbike along Ubi Avenue 3 outside Colourscan Building when a white car knocked into her bike as it went against the traffic. Ms Tong said that the car was trying to overtake other stationary cars waiting for the red light. It was said that there was a long line of cars stuck in a traffic jam on the stretch of road during the time of accident.

Ms Tong suffered injuries from the accident and had to sew 3 stitches on her leg and the bone on her knee shifted a bit so there is some fluids in the knee as a result. The injuries would probably take another 4-6 weeks to heal.

The reason why Ms Tong is calling for witnesses to testify for her case is because the traffic police has informed her that they are unable to determine the party responsible for the accident based on the evidence collected from the investigation.

letter from Traffic police
Letter from the Traffic Police

The investigator in charge of the investigation told Ms Tong that it is usual for the Traffic police to take no further actions if there is lack of evidence. And added that if the Traffic Police was to pursue the case in court , there is no substantial evidence to prove that the driver is the cause of the accident.

According to Ms Tong, even when the investigator was asked about the photo showing that the car drove against traffic. The photo was taken by a 3rd party bystander.

The investigator replied saying that the photo only shows the aftermath of the accident and maybe the car had swerved to the right to avoid her motorbike.

front damage of the car
Dent on the license plate, showing the point of impact

Ms Tong said to him that it is impossible to swerve as it is a two way traffic road.

However, the investigator insisted that both sides are saying two different accounts and since there is no close circuit television monitoring the road, he cannot decide who is right or wrong.

He said that based on his exp and investigation precedents, the evidence that she has, is not a strong evidence, and even if she was to sue the driver, she would lose the case.

combined damage to bike
Damage to Ms Tong’s bike

The driver who had knocked Ms Tong said to her that if he had not swerved from the extreme right of the correct lane he was on, he would have hit her head on.

Ms Tong explains to TOC that she needs eye witnesses for this as she plans to pursue this matter further with the Traffic Police as she does not understand why no further action is taken when the car had clearly committed a traffic offence.

“As a motorbike rider, I’m feel that I’ve been marginalised by the traffic law in Singapore based on the result of this investigation.”

Ms Tong also said that she has since been losing sleep as she remembers in slow motion how she was flung off from her bike from the head on collision with the car.

Her lawyer is now dealing with claims – bike repairs and injury.

TOC has written to the Traffic Police on Saturday and has not received a response on the matter.

Members of public who might have witnessed the accident may write in to TOC at [email protected] for us to relay the message to Ms Tong.

accident site imposed
Superimposed photo of the accident and the actual site.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

扩大太阳能板安装范围 放眼2030满足35万户用电需求

随着全球对化石原料污染意识提高,为朝低碳的未来迈进,我国放眼在2030年,扩大太阳能板安装范围,其太阳能发电能力提高至少七倍以上,并将目前260兆峰瓦水平提高到2千兆峰瓦。 这一目标将可能在2030年满足约35万户家庭的常年用电需求。 太阳能源是目前我国可行的环保再生能源,但由于我国国土面积较小,云层覆盖以及遮蔽造成吸收阳光的不均等问题,因此若要将太阳能成为国家主要供电来源并非易事。 目前太阳能于我国能源总量仅占1巴仙,其余95巴仙则是来自天然气、石油以及煤炭等。由于天然气能够产生更少的温室气体,对自然环境的伤害较小,因此早在2000年间,我国已从石油转向使用天然气,透过邻国印尼或马来西亚,以及世界各地的进口天然气,并逐渐发展成为我国主要能源供应。 尽管天然气被誉为是最清洁的化石燃料,但仍会排放碳排放量,破坏大气层,因此它并不是最环保的选择。 我国贸工部长陈振声表示,为降低我国碳排放,欲将太阳能发电比重提升至4巴仙,减轻对气候的影响。 陈振声称,在这10年期间,太阳能板的安装数量已从30处增加至逾3000处,但仍面对土地制约,因此诸如组屋、学校、国防等公共建筑,以及私人工商建筑的屋顶、未被征用的闲置空地、蓄水池、甚至是岸外水域,都有可能是政府安装太阳能板的范围。 当局也探讨在建筑物侧面或是路面装太阳能板的可行性。 此外,陈振声也表示,我国未来将会接入到区域电网,增加其能源安全性。陈振声也表示我国将投入更多研究在能源储存系统。 除了太阳能能源,各国亦正研发更具实惠的低碳科技。据了解,中国目前正在研究更多其他低碳科技,致力于研制出更实惠的低碳科技选项,如研究使用“绿色氢气”为燃料的可能性,以及碳捕集與封存科技(Carbon Capture and…

川金峰会期间5韩请愿者被捕 新国严法对外籍一视同仁

五名南韩妇女在本月11日晚,前往金正恩下榻的瑞吉酒店附近请愿,被新加坡警方以制造混乱,和多番不听取警方警告,援引《公共秩序法》逮捕。 新加坡警方声明,这批请愿者是在东陵路和那森路交接处,于晚上9时10分被捕。她们的请愿地点正好靠近朝鲜领导人金正恩一行下榻的瑞吉酒店。 据《海峡时报》报导,警方曾劝阻和警告他们,不能在以上管制地区示威请愿,惟后者不愿给予合作,开始吵嚷大声喊叫。鉴于对方持续引发骚动且屡劝不听,警方才实施逮捕。 《2009年公共秩序法案》规定,户外公众游行与集会必需在活动前的至少14天,通知警方跟获得警察许可,否则视为非法。只有室内集会可在无需警方许可下,能自由进行。 仿效伦敦海德公园,新加坡演说者角落是本国唯一不需警方许可,可自由使用、供民众集会的地方。但是,任何人在演说者角落举行活动/请愿之前,还得在国家公园局通过在线方式注册自己的个人信息,该地区周边也有许多闭路监控设备,形同变相的监视。 再者,即使只有一人举着牌子请愿或为任何政治原因(比如,抗议公积金)而静坐,该法也视为非法集会。至于至少5000人参加的公开活动,和上万人参加的私人活动,主办单位必须在活动前的至少28天,通知警方。 近期发生的5名韩籍请愿者被捕事件,显示新国《公共秩序法》对待本国与外籍人士都一视同仁。若外籍人士前来声援或参与本国的人权或社会议题请愿,都有可能被对付。 新、台、马集会比较 在马来西亚举办集会,也需向警察申请准证,警方有权不批准任何地点、时间主题不适合的集会,或会要求主办方更改地点。 马来西亚经历4次干净选举联盟集会以及其他大大小小和平请愿运动,集会者态度已日趋成熟,惟每次的集会都需与警方斡旋、角力。 为了确保集会者安全,也不得随意越过警方防线以及遵守已订立的解散时间,大部分集会者都懂得表现克制,尽量避免留学冲突。 前朝政府在推出《2012年和平集会法令》,企图进一步管制民间发起的集会权利,不过马国上诉庭在2014年一项标志性裁决,捍卫马国人民的集会权利。…

人力部移民关卡局称 拉美斯学历未造假

移民与关卡局及人力部声称,他们已审视Eight Riversuites公寓住户拉美斯(Ramesh Erramalli)的个人资历,表示未找到任何佐证可证明拉美斯学历造假的指控。 此前,有网民爆料质疑拉美斯的学历可能造假,要求当局调查。 为了10元的隔夜停车费,拉美斯在本月26日和保安人员起争执,甚至一度出言不逊,,无礼表示自己花大钱(150万元)买下公寓,自己不是住组屋单位,却要为了停车费被为难。 他和保安阿叔口角的视频被人拍下,并在本地社交媒体迅速疯传,顿时成为当月“网红”。有网民起底拉美斯的个人资历,质疑他的学历背景“不够料”,为何会被录用成为高薪高管。 至于拉美斯的雇主,新加坡全球金融服务公司摩根大通(J.P. Morgan)发出邮件,呼吁员工提高个人素质,包括尊重他人及自重。 上周,内政部则宣称,来自印度的拉美斯,是透过亲属计划(Family Ties Programme),在妻子保荐下获得我国公民权。 人力部在文告中称,从2015年至2019年9月,约有3700外籍人士,因为在申请就业准证提呈造假学历,而被禁止到新加坡工作。其中83人则对学历作出虚假声明。…

疏忽驾驶酿死伤意外 德士司机被判入狱八周

去年在前往新加坡国立大学的金文泰十字路口右转,酿一死三伤意外的德士司机叶国华,今天(8月2日)被判监禁八星期,且吊销驾照五年。 55岁的叶国华承认疏忽驾驶行为造成他人死亡的指控,以及对三名幸存者造成严重伤害的指控。 意外发生在2018年4月19日晚上,家英联邦大道西部和金文泰路交界处。 当时被告在红绿灯右转箭头未亮灯前擅自右转,与迎面而来的汽车相撞。当时迎面而来的驾驶者为21岁的Ng Li Ning,车速为每小时92-97公立之间,无法及时避开被告的车辆。 两车相撞导致国大生,19岁的王楷婷(Kathy Ong)部分身体被抛出车窗外,后来因为多处受伤而在就医时不治身亡。 其他三名乘客受伤,身体多处裂痕、脊柱骨折以及创伤性脑损伤。 指被告意识到风险仍右转 辩方当时指是对面车子的司机一直在超速驾驶,但是首席地方法官Victor Yeo驳回有关观点,并指另一名司机的行为并非此案的缓解因素。…