Mr Khan Osman Sulaiman

osman Sulaiman

Osman Sulaiman, activist and member of opposition party, National Solidarity Party has shared online, a police report which he made about him being tracked by suspicious individuals.

In his note, he shares that he have been followed by a black Toyota car for a few times and that he confirmed that it was indeed shadowing his movement after some deliberate actions to test it out.

In another incident, he shares that 3 different vehicles were used to follow him around.

This is in fact, the second attempt by Osman to make a report. The first time, the police officer also did not want to record his statement but instead asking him to call and speak to the officer. So this time round, he told them that he wanted it on record.

He deducted that it might be due to his involvement in the Gaza solidarity event at Hong Lim Park which had attracted the attention of authorities.

[youtube id=”BVg4PE1YcHM” align=”center” mode=”normal”]

Osman at Hong Lim Park for the event, “In Solidarity with Gaza”

Osman shares of his experience, of how it affected him and what made him make the police report.

Initially, I was very much fearful. But the fears quickly turned to being annoyed. What have I done to deserve being followed like a criminal? Was it my political background? Or was it for being outspoken on Palestinian issues. Either way, there’s nothing criminal for doing both. In fact, by them doing this, it strengthened my resolve to continue and do what is right within the laws of the land.

“The police didnt classify anything. But i believe its harassment and endangering my life as the natural reaction for someone being followed is to shake them off. In doing so, it was a dangerous situation as these officers wouldnt let me out of sight.

The latest incident i didnt get to note down the vehicle number as it was totally new vehicle that followed me.” said Osman.

It is not uncommon for activists, members of opposition parties and people involved in civil societies to be followed by authorities in Singapore.

As seen in the video below, activist and former Singapore Democratic Party candidate, Vincent Wijeysingha was followed by plain clothes policemen after taking part in a candlelight vigil at Little India for Sakthivel Kumaravelu who died from a traffic accident.

[youtube id=”UPF2yjBAr10″ align=”center” mode=”normal”]

 

Below is Osman’s facebook note in full

Some of you may have known from my previous posting that i was followed by people whom I believe to be the police. Whether it’s the ISD or the CID, it doesn’t matter. What matters more is the reason why I was being followed.

A few friends were kind enough to msg me personally and ask if there’s anything serious. They were concern of my well being. Some had thought that I was just imagining things. No I wasn’t. I am very clear on this.

Prior to yesterday’s incident, I had always been followed by a black Toyota Mark X, bearing the number plate SJW3696H. I only realized that I was being shadowed sometime after my GAZA event at Hong Lim Park. I don’t know how many times exactly I was being followed but I can say for sure I was shadowed at least 4 times by this same vehicle on different days.

On why I was certain that it wasn’t just my imagination:

I made a few manoeuvres which doesn’t make sense if one is driving normally. I made 2 consecutive U-turns. I slowed down to a crawling pace. I accelerated at will. I parked by the side of the road. I wasted a couple of dollars to enter and exit from a shopping centre car park. All the time, the vehicle followed my route.

The last time I saw the black Toyota Mark X was on 31 Dec 2014 when I attended SDP’s event at Thomson. Yesterday’s incident involved 3 different vehicles. 2 cars and one bike. It was surprising that they would actually deploy such manpower over an individual like me.

Initially, I was very much fearful. But the fears quickly turned to being annoyed. What have I done to deserve being followed like a criminal? Was it my political background? Or was it for being outspoken on Palestinian issues. Either way, there’s nothing criminal for doing both. In fact, by them doing this, it strengthened my resolve to continue and do what is right within the laws of the land.

I have made a police report about the incident yesterday. As a citizen, I have every right to know why am I under such scrutiny. What suspicions have they got to encroach on the rights of an individual and compromise my privacy.

I wish to understand this from their points of view and meet with these officers to get a clearer picture. They are not going to silence me by these cheap tactics. I will soon write in to MHA and request for an audience with the appropriate officers. If need be, I shall camp outside their office as this involve my safety.

osman police report

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The Geopolitics of Asian Cyberspace

  This article is taken from FEER. By Ronald Deibert What happens…

黄循财:需在居民立场取得平衡 黄国光称不放弃争取组屋合法养猫

义顺集选区议员黄国光昨日(7日)表示,不会放弃争取组屋内合法养猫。 国家发展部长黄循财在本月6日透过书面答复议员提问,指政府必须在养宠物的居民与拒养宠物的居民之间取得平衡,不负责任放养宠物可能有碍社区整洁,严重可能造成邻里不睦。 他指可能“有碍整洁”的情况,包括宠物脱毛、宠物在公共场所随意大小便、以及喂养流浪猫等。 黄循财也指出,尽管这些不负责任行为很有可能会出现,但也不排除组屋内仍有爱猫、且愿意为居民居住环境着想的居民。因此建屋局将会与国家公园管理局,以及兽医服务持续检讨和改善宠物所有权政策。 随后,黄国光于脸书上发文表示,尽管此次争取不成功,但仍未能阻止他持续推行组屋内养猫的想法。 “看起来,对于建屋局而言,组屋内养猫仍然不行,但我会持续坚持下去,为组屋养猫持续发声。” 义顺集选区议员黄国光多年来关注动物相关议题,也是动保团体Animal Concerns Research and Education Society(简称ACRES)的创始人兼首席执行官。…

恐步入历史 网民吁为传统冰淇淋摊留生路

乌节路的冰淇淋摊为该街道上的一大特色,但是随着年迈摊主逐渐老去,这类摊位可能也将迈入历史的遗迹。网民大感惋惜,并展开网上请愿书,期盼能够为此行业寻得一线生机。 昨日(26日),《亚洲新闻台》报导传统冰淇淋摊贩的困境,因为受到执照条例的限制,这类“古早味”将有可能销声匿迹。据新加坡食品局指出,这些街头小贩所持有的执照都只属于摊主个人的,不能够转让给其他人,包括亲友。 全国仅13街头摊贩 环境和水源部长马善高曾于2016年的国会上指出,我国在1994年发放了一批街头小贩执照,之后就再也没有发放了,旨在控制街头小贩数量,并且让类似行业逐渐被淘汰掉,转而进入正轨的场所营业。 当局指出,全国只有13名可在任何“公共场所”贩卖冰淇淋的街头摊贩,其中就有七人在乌节路摆摊。 经营了冰淇淋摊贩已54年的詹爷爷(71岁),在1965年开始成为摊贩后,曾在乌节路诗家董建筑外驻以及义安城外摆摊。据报导, 若类似的摊贩“消失”了实属可惜,毕竟也算是本土特色之一,而且是否还会有人,为保留类似传统摊贩而努力,也不得而知。 曾被中国美食节目《十二道锋味》介绍的詹爷爷,客户来自全球各地,包括有印尼、中国、泰国和菲律宾,而之前也有前泰国首相他信亲临他的摊位。 为了笼络年轻顾客,詹爷爷的儿子也为他设立脸书页面。 但是,也有摊贩表示将会在两三年内,随着年龄增长而退休。 其中卖冰的陈阿福(译音)以及陈永陵都表示,随着科技的进步,更多舒适方便的购物商场出现,摊贩生意将随着时间消失。 保留传统…

网传照片指警员为达标检查回教学生 警方斥散播叫消息

网传有公共交通保安指挥处(TransCom)警员为了“达到限额(quota)”,就对两名回教学校(Madrasah)学生进行检查一事,遭到警方反驳,指贴出有关文章的网友非常不负责任,散播假信息之余,更涉嫌挑起各族群之间矛盾。 昨日在警方脸书上帖文,针对此事件作出澄清,指当时的警员只是向两名学生讲解于7月2日推出的通勤者守望计划(Riders-On-Watch)。 文中,警方表示两名学生也参与了有关计划,与其他志愿者协助维持本地的公共交通网络安全。 通勤者守望计划主要是让民众、公共交通使用者成为防范罪案的志愿者,透过警民合作来巩固地铁站等公共交通地点的安全。 民众也可上网到警察部队网站,询问“ask Jamie”以了解计划详情,并且扫描QR码进行登记。 校方吁民尊重学生隐私 阿马亚里夫回教学校(Madrasah Al-Ma’arif Al-Islamiah)昨晚也在脸书上帖文,对部分网民传播该校学生照片并作出断章取义的文章感到震惊。 该校也呼吁民众尊重学生隐私,不要继续传播相关照片或作出猜测。