YangYin
YangYin

Former tour guide Yang Yin, currently facing potentially more than 300 charges in relation to the case of 87 year-old multimillionaire widow, Mdm Chung Khin Chun, is currently claiming S$1.1m worth of Mdm’s Chung’s money as his, and is demanding access to an allowance of $12,000.

Mr Yang, 40, claims that the S$1.1m, currently residing in four of bank accounts, was a gift from Chung and belongs to him.

He also argued that Mdm Chung, who was suffering from dementia, did not have the mental capacity to change a will from one where she left him everything to one in which most of her wealth will go to charity.

Mr Yang had previously told the courts that he was merely holding on to the money, but now changed to claim it as he was “not proficient in English” when making his first statement.

In addition, Mr Yang is also asking for access to a monthly fee of S$12,000, which was meant to be for his personal and legal expenses.

In August 2014, the High Court ordered a freeze on Yang’s assets, with the exception of the monthly allowance.

However, Mr Yang’s lawyer, Joseph Liow, told media before a pre-trial conference yesterday that his client could not withdraw the money from his bank accounts.

Mr Yang had sent letters to the lawyers of Mdm Hedy Mok askign to withdraw the fund. Mdm Mok is Mdm Chung’s niece, who had sued Mr Yang for damages and alleged breach of duties under the Lasting Power of Attorney granted earlier to him by Mdm Chung.

However, Mdm Mok’s lawyers told him that he is not allowed to make the withdrawals.

“They have not honoured it,” said Mr Liow to media, adding that a court application was filed on Monday for the freeze of funds to be lifted or for Mr Yang to be granted access to his allowance.

Mr Yang claimed that his current expenses are paid of by loans from family and friends in China and that these funds have been exhausted.

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SDP says they have parental consent for child in their video, questions if PAP does the same for photos it posts on their FB page

Three weeks ago, the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) released a video to…

看不见的“廉价”客工 拿命为新加坡的繁荣拼搏

新加坡大量引进廉价劳工,至2017年12月,外籍劳工总数约为136万人,绝大多数从事“肮脏、劳累和危险”的3D职业,填补了劳力结构上的空缺,也降低工资成本,对经济增长扮演重要角色。 本国劳工受到劳工法令等保障权益,但是我国客工遭剥削问题长期引来人权组织诟病,他们被招工代理征收昂贵中介费导致债务缠身、拖欠薪资、扣留护照甚至暴力和性侵事件,都藏在新加坡经济繁荣的表象下。 客工并不在劳工法令保护范围,也不受工时限制局限,甚至有雇主假冠客工“经理”虚名,实则规避付加班费的责任。普遍这些客工教育程度不高,加上雇主往往扣留护照或克扣薪资加以挟持,使得客工唯有容忍唯命是从。 2016年6月,孟加拉籍移工拉曼就为了遵守上司的指令,让自己遭受无可挽回的代价。当时,他被指示清理双溪登雅一处蓄水缸,入口沙井非常狭小,拉曼也反映缸中有异味,但是被上司斥责在找借口不想做,拉曼唯有硬着头皮接下任务。 拉曼和同事携带卤素灯下井,就在拉曼打开卤素灯时,不幸发生了,卤素灯电源与缸中气体产生反应,引起爆炸。拉曼的同事被震出外面,但是困在缸里的拉曼顿时被火海包围,造成73巴仙严重烧伤,昏迷3个月。 阿曼经历一系列手术,重建他的眼、鼻和耳朵,移工经济人道组织(HOME)为他众筹得1万5千新元。 社区行动网络(CAN)负责人、社运分子范国瀚在其脸书揭露,当拉曼准备出院时,他的同事曾有意说出真相,却被老板勒令回家,这是企图掩盖事实的一贯做法。 再者,执法单位对知情者的保护极少,出头帮受害者,往往会被雇主施以其他形式的惩罚,例如更多的工作量、被革职等等。 受害客工索偿,却被要求测谎 “人资部在询问拉曼时,似乎把拉曼被当作骗子般,即使他经历严重身心灵创伤,都是他自己造成的错。”人资部甚至要对他进行测谎,相信是为了确认他不是为了骗取工伤救济金。对待本地劳工肯定不会动用测谎仪。 范国瀚感叹,本地政府、救济组织在回应客工争取权益时,往往抱有“假定弱势者想欺诈体制”的防卫心态,可是从不关心这些客工的想法。 即使“福利诈欺”在新加坡的个案并不显著,但有者仍捍卫对客工抱持怀疑态度,可避免“资源被浪费”和维持体制公平,是务实的做法。当这些真正面对困境的客工伸出手求救时,往往是这种“务实”态度形成阶级对立的歧视,让这些客工的声音被忽视。…

COI report a wasted opportunity: Workfair Singapore

By Howard Lee Workfair Singapore (WS), a group of civil society volunteers championing…