indoor stadium

Most of those who took part in a poll by the Straits Times have graded the Sports Hub’s performance in its first six months as below par.

The Hub, supposed to be Singapore’s new icon to the world, has been graded a “F-“ by 28 per cent of those polled, while 21 per cent gave it a “C-“.

13 per cent gave it a “C”, and another 13 per cent a “F”.

ST Poll results as at 7am, Wed 14 Jan 2015
ST Poll results as at 7am, Wed 14 Jan 2015

The current level of dissatisfaction with the performance of the Sports Hub from the public, however, seems to be in contrast to that of the Hub’s management.

According to the Straits Times, the management has judged the Hub’s “current state” to be a “A- or B+.”

The newspaper criticised this and said that “[the] first rule of sport is humility” and that the “Sports Hub’s senior management have perhaps forgotten” this by patting itself on the back with a more flattering performance grade.

The 35ha hub, built at a cost of more than S$1 billion, has seen infrastructural shortcomings since opening in June last year.

These include leaky roofs, cracked ceilings, poor lighting, and the atrocious condition of the centrepiece of the hub – the National Stadium pitch, which has been roundly criticised not only by Singaporeans but also by international teams which played on it.

The Online Citizen has a run-down of these incidents. Read them here: “Sports Hub vows to fix pitch by March”.

Some have questioned if the poor management has done irreparable damage to Singapore’s reputation as a country of efficiency, and to its ambitions to be a sporting centre of the region and the world.

The hub’s management had had to spend a further S$1.5 million to buy new artificial grass to replace the old one at the National Stadium which had failed to grow properly.

And on Tuesday, the management vowed to fix the problems of the leaky roof.

Given the series of rather serious incidents, questions are being raised about who should take responsibility for them.

[3rd, right] MCCY Minister Wong; Devalaud [extreme right] [Photo: Straits Times]
[3rd, right] MCCY Minister Wong; Devalaud [extreme right][Photo: Straits Times]
Philippe Collin Delavaud is the chief executive officer of Sports Hub Pte Ltd, the company responsible for financing, developing and operating the landmark sports centre.

The Sports Hub is also under the purview of the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY), headed by Lawrence Wong.

You can vote on the Straits Times poll here: “How would you rate the performance of the Sports Hub in its first six months?”

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

黄循财:未来再无分流制 转型科目编班全面计划

教育部长兼财政部第二部长黄循财表示,未來将会移除分流制(streaming),在中学全面实施科目编班全面计划(Full Subject-based Banding)。 黄循财于今日(4日)在脸书上发文表示,要从分流制转换到科目编班全面计划的确是非常重大的工程,尤其是对于教学和课程安排上。 前教育部长王乙康,是在去年3月作出宣布,本地中学生的普通和快捷源流之区分,将在2024年结束,正式宰了落实近40年的分流制“圣牛”。 他也指出,日前曾到访试点中学立德中学(Riverside Secondary School),其中有许多来自不同背景的中一学生,他们除了共同学习品格与公民教育课程(CCE),其他科目如英语、数学或科学都会根据他们的学科群分组学习。 经视察后,黄循财表示,其效果确实非常正面,从教师中反馈中可得知学生能够根据自己的节奏,并在没有任何偏见底下安心学习,加强自己的强项,同时也能够在小班课程建立稳固的同侪关系。 “有一位老师告诉我,在年头(疫情爆发前),学生参与了为期一周的培训课程,他们一同生活在一起,有助于建立稳固的友谊,让他们进入下一个课程。在科目比较强的同学能够协助较为弱的同学,而且每个人都有自己的学习节奏,又不附带任何标签学习,亦能够融入班级中。” 基于种种可见的好处,黄循财表示,将决定在明年推广新的教育改革,逐步改善学校的教育制度。 科目编班计划是在2014年推出,当时有12所中学试行,让普通源流学生从中一起就根据个人强项修读程度较高的科目。计划取得良好成效,去年已扩大到所有提供普通源流的中学,但学生目前可选的科目只限于英文、母语、数学和科学。…

诉求有尊严的年长者护理服务

昨日,一名网民分享,岳父疑在疗养院未获妥善照料,以致病情恶化,即使向卫生部申诉要求调查,两年后也未有结果。 此事在社交媒体引起广泛回响。在我国将迈向人口老龄化,我们的乐龄群体,是否能享有妥善、可负担乃至有尊严的长期护理照顾,一直都是国民关心的课题。 这名网民王光祥的岳父不幸在今年8月离世,留下的不仅是亲人的思念,还有高昂医疗开销。 事实上,两个月前,也有报导指一名女儿入禀法庭,向救世军安乐之家疗养院索赔10万元。诉方指其百岁母亲在居住该疗养院的六年期间,身上多处受伤、无故跌倒,甚至让母亲下身只穿纸尿片坐在床上,不顾其尊严。 目前,住疗养院每月的开销预计介于1千200元至3千500元之间,中位数成本也在2千400元,也要依据长者的状况而定。 使用疗养院服务的年长者逾万人。在2020年,预计我国65岁以上人口将突破61万,到了2030年预计达到90万。显而易见,包括疗养院、居家或中心式看护等的长期护理服务的提升刻不容缓。 在本月10日,卫生部长颜金勇,在国会透过书面回答工人党非选区医院吴佩松,曾提及疗养院的看护服务,是针对那些需要更多照顾需求的体弱年长者,故此不适合拿疗养院的看护成本与居家看护对比。 他建议那些面对财务困难的民众,可联系医疗社工洽谈,或者动用保健基金(medifund)。 1700人参与居家个人看护计划 此外,目前有1千700明乐龄人士,参与居家个人看护(HPC)服务。他们接受日常起居的辅助,如沐浴和饮食,以及打扫起居、添购日用品,也陪老人进行锻炼身心活动。   居家个人看护服务在津贴前,收费平均为每小时23元,也取决于受照顾年长者的需求。符合条件者能获得80巴仙的津贴。若年长者有需求,居家看护服务提供者也能提供社区和财务支援。…

Tharman says to give SGs hope and career advancement while Prof Koh cautions more driving grab

In a speech live-streamed on the People’s Action Party’s (PAP) Facebook page…

“Sacking” of the Lions – start of slow and painful transition

by Damon Yeo Of late, our national football team seemed to have…