Crowd sings the national anthem at Speakers’ Corner protest.
Ngerng addresses a crowd of thousands
Ngerng addresses a crowd of thousands
By Gangasudhan
Singapore has predominately been based on ‘old power’ from independence into the 21st century, where a top-down, wealth-driven structure dictates the way things are done for the entire population on the island. This is not unique to Singapore though, and many corporations and nations alike still adhere to such a paradigm.
However, many places around the world have seen the horizon change with the advent of people-driven, bottom-up movements coordinated using social media. For example, the January 2011 mass protests that led to President Mubarak stepping down started from a YouTube video blog by Asmaa Mahfouz, followed by the mobilization of people through Facebook. Similarly, the Occupy Wall Street movement – as well as the many other iterations of this peaceful protest strategy, has been primarily coordinated through social media.
But Singapore has strongly held onto the status quo that was established early in our post-independence history. In spite of all the rhetorical grandstanding using fashionable terminology such as “light touch” in regulating internet discourse and enacting token policy changes such as creating the Speakers’ Corner in Hong Lim Park as a “free speech platform” in 2000, the government is still pretty much an old power institution that couldn’t handle a prominent blogger, mrbrown, being light-heartedly critical of the government in a mainstream print newspaper – arguably getting him fired from his columnist role at TODAY in 2006.
Protesters expressing their displeasure about CPF
Protesters expressing their displeasure about CPF
The time is now for New Power
New power in Singapore has been emerging since at least the turn of the century but it has been a slow and painful process for the most part – and some would argue, still very much is. The government has tried continually to clamp down on ‘dissent’ – as it sees new power as being – by prosecuting ‘instigators’ under sedition charges, creating incredible hoops to jump through before being granted a highly-restrictive licence to “news websites” (which are conveniently defined by the state machinery), or taking critics to court under the open-ended caveat of defamation.
But new power has shown time and again that its energy cannot be subdued forever, especially in recent times – perhaps, much to the disappointment of the government. From being described as ‘unhappy people’ and the ‘vocal minority’, we are regularly blanket-labeled as just ‘netizens’.
However, the reality is that new power has begun to impact the policy decisions and general administration of the country.
sim lim square todayIn the Sim Lim Square saga where unscrupulous practices of a number of electronic shops came to light, the excuses of the old power mechanism could not outwit or outlast the raw energy of the collective, forcing Ministers to backtrack on their initial pragmatic course of ‘allowing due process to prevail’. When new power transformed online criticism and condemnation into physical activism, the authorities were suddenly empowered to shut down the offending stores and seize the equipment used in the commission of the offence.
Earlier in the year, when the National Library Board (NLB) tried to act as Singapore’s moral guardian and remove three books depicting same-sex families (or, against its ‘strong pro family stance’, according to the library), the online condemnation also similarly turned into physical activism of peaceful protest in the form of a book-reading event. Eventually, with the negative publicity not abating, NLB reversed its decision to pulp the books altogether and instead, moved two of them to the adult section.
Let's Read Together NLB 1 Andrew Loh
“Let’s Read!” event at the National Library (image – Andrew Loh)
And who can forget the civil suit by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong against blogger Roy Ngerng with regard to the latter’s assertions regarding how Central Provident Fund (CPF) monies are channeled into investment by the government. The online support for the blogger translated into over $100,000 in funds raised to help the blogger defend himself in the civil suit and pay for any potential damages, and sparked a fervent and ceaseless discussion on the matter that reached parliamentary proceedings. 10 questions were raised from 7 members of parliament regarding the CPF – including the statistics on CPF members’ use of their funds for housing, the withdrawal age and minimum sum requirements.
Out with the old, in with the new
These are just a few examples of how new power is changing the face of the Singapore landscape, especially in politics. If you thought the impact of online campaigning in the last general election was remarkable, wait till the next one comes along, riding the wave of new power. The impact will be very much more significant and game-changing than the old-school establishment is anticipating.
If the Singapore government continues to invest most of its energy in finding ways to ‘fix’ new power to fit into its old power model, it will end badly for its future.
Instead, it needs to embrace new power wholeheartedly (i.e. not merely the facade of cooperation served by lip-service) and work with it to form a whole new kind of relationship if it intends to survive the next bout of elections. It needs to recognize and reconcile with the fact that new power’s raw energy is just too unbridled to be contained – but it can be harnessed, with genuine sincerity.


For an overview of what the terms old power and new power mean, watch activist Jeremy Heimans’ Ted Talk, What New Power Looks Like.
[iframe id=”https://embed-ssl.ted.com/talks/jeremy_heimans_what_new_power_looks_like.html” align=”center” mode=”normal”]

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

牛车水中秋节嫦娥像惹争议 网民讥:后羿假扮

一年一度的中秋节即将来临,我国各地亦纷纷布置一番迎接佳节,但牛车水一带的布置竟惹争议。 位于裕华国货外的十字路口处达四五层楼高的中秋装饰,其中最惹人争议便是达两层楼高的“嫦娥人像”,让公众摸不着头脑。 该“嫦娥人像”身穿蓝绿衣,手挽粉红色水袖。尽管扎了发髻,脸上刻画着炯炯有神的双眼及细眉,还有挺拔的鼻梁及樱桃般的小嘴,但却显男子气概,看不出一点女性气质。这尊带有“中性气质”的嫦娥似乎也很不被接受,许多网友纷纷狠批更像是“人妖”。 照片曝光后,引起网友吐槽,嫦娥人像并没有女性气质,反而更像是后羿附体 还有部分网民吐槽人像更像是长得中性的女子,并调侃说是东方不败    部分网友则斥责当局的审美观,认为牛车水地区是旅游观光区,若以不达水平的工艺显现出来,只会让人笑掉大牙,等于是对大众的侮辱,甚至质疑当局及筹备委员是否偷工减料。

印尼政府查封20家涉林火外企 九家与狮城有关联

印尼环境与森林部声称,至少20家外国企业涉嫌印尼烧森林引发林火,其中有九家为来自或办公处设在新加坡的公司,以及六家马来西亚公司。 根据印尼媒体《Tempo.co》报导,最新调查指出,共有64家企业涉嫌引发林火,其中20家为外国企业,涉及与新加坡与马来西亚有关联的公司,主要在印尼经营棕榈树种植与木材种植园,大多位于西加里曼丹省、廖内省、中加里曼丹省、占碑省和南苏门答腊省。 印尼环境和林业部执法组主任萨尼周二(1日)指出,该企业的土地目前已被查封,将进一步调查是否涉嫌蓄意违法烧森林。 他也强调,当局并不会因为企业的背景而有所偏颇,绝对会一视同仁。 “无论是谁,只要犯下违法焚烧森林的罪行,均需为此负责。“他说。 任萨尼也强调,涉嫌焚烧森林的公司将会绳之以法,他们可以透过地点、时间以及地区追踪与鉴证土地情况到公司。他也呼吁相关的地方政府,加强监管这些企业,防止林火问题重演。 此前,印尼环境议题新闻网站Foresthints发表文章揭发至少三家办公处设在新加坡的种植公司,被点名涉嫌导致引起林火。其中一家Hutan Ketapang Industri,是Sampoerna Agri Resources的旗下公司。 至于另外两家,为亚洲纸浆纸品公司(Asia…

【选举】西海岸集选区或迎来三角战?

昨日(15日),新加坡革新党(Reform Party)宣布第一批准候选人。尽管没有说明这些准候选人将在哪一区上阵,不过其中三人曾在上届选举,随该党秘书长肯尼斯一同攻打西海岸集选区。 上届选举,肯尼斯率领朱来成、诺莱尼·尤纳斯以及苏源顺,对垒前贸工部长林勋强率领的行动党团队,后者以78.6巴仙高得票率胜选。目前该选区由通讯与新闻部长易华仁领导。 至于前进党上周五(12日)也公布将随该党秘书长陈清木医生,一同竞逐西海岸的团队。肯尼斯则表示,他们之间仍在合作,也希望避免三角战局面。 今年3月,选区范围检讨委员会报告,原本是四人集选区的西海岸,已扩大为五人集选区。与东海岸集选区一样,过去都是兵家必争之地。 早前,前进党就已大阵仗访西海岸,引起各界揣测该党有意强攻此区。根据选区范围委会划分,该区扩大为五人集选区后,也纳入丰加北单选区,和蔡厝港集选区的一部分。 据知革新党除了西海岸选区,也有意竞逐宏茂桥集选区(总理团队管理的选区)、拉丁马士单选区(现任议员陈振泉,选民2万5167人)和新增的杨厝港单选区(从宏茂桥划出,选民2万6046人)。 除了2011年和2015年征战西海岸选区,肯尼斯也曾在2013年的榜鹅东补选出战,这致使当时补选出现四角战战局,不过最终由工人党的李丽连击败许宝琨医生。肯尼斯仅得票353票,失按柜金。      

Honour in Singapore – Keepers of the “gates”

Honour in Singapore” is a mini series by TOC following the recent formation…