By Ariffin Sha
On 23 December, Wendy Cheng (also known as Xiaxue), a local well-known blogger published a blogpost which sent a lot of people on the internet on a frenzy. Hashtags like #FaithinGushCloud and #FaithinXiaXue started making their rounds around Twitter feeds and Facebook walls.
The post, titled The Big Gushcloud Exposé, ran up to more than 5,000 words and a whole lot of other external links, numbers and charts, the singular purpose which was to say, “Gushcloud cannot be trusted as a blogger endorsement platform”.
In it, Xiaxue provided “evidence” from her investigation to accuse Gushcloud of faking the reach figures of its bloggers and partaking in other unethical tactics.
Here is a concise summary that covers a quick background, the five allegations Xiaxue made against Gushcloud, and the response by Gushcloud and its co-founder Althea Lim.
Why do we bother? Because an expose is always fun to read, especially one that digs up the figures. Also, the case gives us an interesting perspective on how advertising through bloggers work (or doesn’t work).
Background Information
GClogo
Gushcloud is a popular social media marketing agency in Singapore which helps advertisers reach out to their target audience through its 10,000 social media influencers.’
Its main rival is Nuffnang. Xiaxue is a shareholder in Nuffnang and has been with the company since its infancy. The owner of Nuffnang, Ming, is a close friend of Xiaxue.
Xiaxue claims to have gone undercover by creating a fake company, SG Private Trainers. She pretended to work with Gushcloud with the intention of collecting evidence of Gushcloud’s unethical behaviour. She also claims to have collected evidence for almost one year before releasing it in her blogpost.
Allegation 1: Inflated earnings

Gushcloud's Financial Report for 2012
Gushcloud’s Financial Report for 2012 which was posted by Xiaxue
Gushcloud has been reported in November 2012 to have a monthly revenue of $170,000, up from just $25,000 in February 2012. Xiaxue claimed that these earnings were inflated – such earnings would have accumulated to $590,000 for 2012, but Gushcloud’s financial report states that its total revenue for 2012 was only $396,005.
Allegation 2: Astroturfing
The e-mail sent to Gushcloud using 'SG Private Trainers'
Image of the e-mail sent to Gushcloud using ‘SG Private Trainers’ by Xiaxue
Using SG Private Trainers, Xiaxue engaged the services of Gushcloud. She bought an Instagram ad for $300 where she wanted Yilin, one of the bloggers manged by Gushcloud, to promote her the company’s services without revealing the fact that it was an advertisement.
Such a practice is called ad masking, or astroturfing.
Although Gushcloud did not give explicit assurance that it would mask the ad, Yilin’s post on instagram suggested that it was done as such.
Yilin's post on Instagram
Yilin’s post on Instagram
Allegation 3: Inflated page views
jackiecharthahageddit
Xiaxue also bought banner ads from three blogs under Gushcloud, which she then tracked for the amount of views her banner ads receive daily. She claims that the number of views her banner ads received was substantially lower than what Gushcloud and/or the bloggers themselves claim their number of daily page views to be.
Allegation 4: Fake subscribers and viewers on YouTube
While admitting in her blog post that there is no concrete way to proof that YouTube views and subscribers are fake, Xiaxue attempted to prove that Gushcloud was doing this by tracking the exact number of views, subscribers and likes of a YouTube channel under the Gushcloud network called Babe of All Trades, at 11 am every day.

graph compare

According to Xiaxue’s blogpost, she wrote that more often than not, a YouTube video would have an initial spike of views for the first few days after its release, which then tapers off in the weeks or months that follow. If plotted on a graph, the views will increase steadily and sharply before eventually plateauing off. Xiaxue then plotted a graph to compare one of her videos with one from Babe of All Trades.
3
Xiaxue also noted a uniform increase of 10 likes everyday on another episode as further evidence of Gushcloud buying views.
To note, these are not the official statistics from YouTube and is in no way provide substantial proof that Gushcloud bought fake likes, views and subsribers. Gushcloud’s co-founder and CEO, Mr Vincent Ha had also previously denied such claims.
Allegation 5: Irregular financial reports
Xiaxue ended by accusing Gushcloud for being financially unsound and almost running on deficits. She suggested that they are unable to pay their vendors and influencers, and backed it up with a “qualified opinion” for the 2012 financial reports and Gushcloud’s balance sheets.
Xiaxue ended her post by advising GushCloud influencers to withdraw their money, terminate their contract and publicly announce that they are no longer associated with them. She even offered legal advice to those who are in need of it by asking them to e-mail her.
Gushcloud responds
3
Four hours after Xiaxue’s post, Gushcloud announced that it is exploring legal options on Xiaxue’s post. In an Instagram post, it asserted that the article was inaccurate. It also said that it believed that the blogpost was calculated to disparage and injure its reputation. It also attempted to rally its supporters with the hashtag #FaithinGushCloud.
Gushcloud’s co-founder, Ms Althea Lim also penned a personal statement to Xiaxue, refuting the allegations to be “far from the truth”. She also questioned Xiaxue’s ulterior motives, reminding readers that she is a stakeholder and/or a shareholder in Nuffnang, Gushcloud’s rival.
Ms Lim also refuted the allegation of bought YouTube views, by posting two pictures of statistics from YouTube’s Google Analytics.

The number of Pageviews for the video
The number of Pageviews for the video
The geographical analysis of viewers
The geographical analysis of viewers
The peaks indicate spikes in video views. Ms Lim also noted the spikes on weekends. She also noted that the tell-tale sign of bought views, with hits from countries like Russia and Afghanistan that occur as a sudden spike on a single day for a specific video, did not happen with Babe of All Trades. Also, 87% of views for it’s videos come from Singapore and Malaysia.
Before ending her statement, she noted that Xiaxue says ‘standing up to bullies is the right thing to do.” Ms Lim went on to accuse Xiaxue of using ‘bullying antics,’ not only against Gushcloud in her latest post but against many. She also accused Xiaxue of being a liar and challenged Xiaxue to sue her if she believed that she was wrong to say so.
Gushcloud has also released an official statement, which we have covered in a separate article.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

India-Singapore air travel bubble arrangement is not as “Singaporeans understand it to be”: CAAS

The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) on Thursday (28 Jan) shed…

点评张志贤演说 梁文辉称外交政策也朝错误方向发展

昨日(11日),国务资政兼国家安全统筹部长张志贤,发表“冠病后时代保障新加坡未来”演说。对于国际局势,他认为冠病扰乱国际体系,中美竞争加剧、全球供应链中断。但他认为,各国不应因冠病渐行渐远;需要新的国际协议,逐步恢复跨境交流、往来,各国需维持合作与贸易关系。 但前进党秘书长梁文辉点评,除了我们的国内政策外,我们的外交政策也朝着错误的方向发展。 他指出,作为全球化超级推动者,我们政府实施很多异常政策。当其他国家因工业转移而蒙受失业,我们仍邀请外国人来接管我们的工作。 当其他国家正考虑如何对全球性资本征税的时候,我们却削减了税收(个人税,遗产税,利息收入免税等)还张开双臂吸引资本。这些政策都严重破坏了我们的社会经济结构和职业道德。 全球化“已消亡” 梁文辉认为,外交部门必须意识到,从苏联解体到现在的原始形式的全球化已经“死亡”。 还在维护全球化体系,终将徒劳无功。 全球化造成的社会和经济破坏至少需要一代人才能解决。关键的一环是对以牺牲国内就业为代价,在全球范围内自由流动获取暴利的全球性资本征税。这不会很快实现,因为国际金融家们的游说势力太大了。 也许外交部应该告诉世界,我们理解当前反全球化浪潮,并且提出有助纠正全球化问题的想法。 “我们还应该再迈出一步,摆脱我们的新重商主义国家形象 - 这是一个只关心贸易并从中牟利的国家。利润(黄金,贸易盈余或外汇储备)的积累是最终动机。亚当·史密斯(Adam…

女子涉企图自杀和蓄意伤害警方被捕

一名34岁女子涉嫌企图自杀与蓄意伤害警方,目前已被警方逮捕。 公民记者网站《Stomp》报道,该自杀事件由网民 Yan long拍摄下来,发生在周日(29日)下午,马林台(Marine Terrace) 第15座组屋。 根据视频显示,当时已有民防部队人员在组屋楼下铺设气垫,网民也指出民防部队也将周围封锁。 警方随后也回复Stomp的询问,证实在当日下午2点37分左右接获通报,便立马去到现场处理。 警方发言人也表示,该名那女子因涉嫌自杀与蓄意伤害公务员执勤,而遭到警方逮捕,并在意识清醒的状态下,被送往樟宜综合医院。目前案件仍在侦办中。 国会5月通过废除企图自杀罪 今年5月,国会通过废除企图自杀罪,但教唆他人自杀罪则仍然有罪,最高刑罚将长达10年;而教唆未成年或缺乏心智能力者自杀或企图自杀的刑罚更高。 内政部兼卫生部高级政务次长安宁·阿敏强调,尽管废除企图自杀罪,但唆使他人依然属于犯罪行为,而且修法案还加强了唆使自杀的刑罚,包括安乐死的行为。

The end of 100 years “‘real’ affordable healthcare” under this present Parliament?

Parliament debates removing century-old law by sending to Select Committee 1st time since…