By Ariffin Sha
On 23 December, Wendy Cheng (also known as Xiaxue), a local well-known blogger published a blogpost which sent a lot of people on the internet on a frenzy. Hashtags like #FaithinGushCloud and #FaithinXiaXue started making their rounds around Twitter feeds and Facebook walls.
The post, titled The Big Gushcloud Exposé, ran up to more than 5,000 words and a whole lot of other external links, numbers and charts, the singular purpose which was to say, “Gushcloud cannot be trusted as a blogger endorsement platform”.
In it, Xiaxue provided “evidence” from her investigation to accuse Gushcloud of faking the reach figures of its bloggers and partaking in other unethical tactics.
Here is a concise summary that covers a quick background, the five allegations Xiaxue made against Gushcloud, and the response by Gushcloud and its co-founder Althea Lim.
Why do we bother? Because an expose is always fun to read, especially one that digs up the figures. Also, the case gives us an interesting perspective on how advertising through bloggers work (or doesn’t work).
Background Information
GClogo
Gushcloud is a popular social media marketing agency in Singapore which helps advertisers reach out to their target audience through its 10,000 social media influencers.’
Its main rival is Nuffnang. Xiaxue is a shareholder in Nuffnang and has been with the company since its infancy. The owner of Nuffnang, Ming, is a close friend of Xiaxue.
Xiaxue claims to have gone undercover by creating a fake company, SG Private Trainers. She pretended to work with Gushcloud with the intention of collecting evidence of Gushcloud’s unethical behaviour. She also claims to have collected evidence for almost one year before releasing it in her blogpost.
Allegation 1: Inflated earnings

Gushcloud's Financial Report for 2012
Gushcloud’s Financial Report for 2012 which was posted by Xiaxue
Gushcloud has been reported in November 2012 to have a monthly revenue of $170,000, up from just $25,000 in February 2012. Xiaxue claimed that these earnings were inflated – such earnings would have accumulated to $590,000 for 2012, but Gushcloud’s financial report states that its total revenue for 2012 was only $396,005.
Allegation 2: Astroturfing
The e-mail sent to Gushcloud using 'SG Private Trainers'
Image of the e-mail sent to Gushcloud using ‘SG Private Trainers’ by Xiaxue
Using SG Private Trainers, Xiaxue engaged the services of Gushcloud. She bought an Instagram ad for $300 where she wanted Yilin, one of the bloggers manged by Gushcloud, to promote her the company’s services without revealing the fact that it was an advertisement.
Such a practice is called ad masking, or astroturfing.
Although Gushcloud did not give explicit assurance that it would mask the ad, Yilin’s post on instagram suggested that it was done as such.
Yilin's post on Instagram
Yilin’s post on Instagram
Allegation 3: Inflated page views
jackiecharthahageddit
Xiaxue also bought banner ads from three blogs under Gushcloud, which she then tracked for the amount of views her banner ads receive daily. She claims that the number of views her banner ads received was substantially lower than what Gushcloud and/or the bloggers themselves claim their number of daily page views to be.
Allegation 4: Fake subscribers and viewers on YouTube
While admitting in her blog post that there is no concrete way to proof that YouTube views and subscribers are fake, Xiaxue attempted to prove that Gushcloud was doing this by tracking the exact number of views, subscribers and likes of a YouTube channel under the Gushcloud network called Babe of All Trades, at 11 am every day.

graph compare

According to Xiaxue’s blogpost, she wrote that more often than not, a YouTube video would have an initial spike of views for the first few days after its release, which then tapers off in the weeks or months that follow. If plotted on a graph, the views will increase steadily and sharply before eventually plateauing off. Xiaxue then plotted a graph to compare one of her videos with one from Babe of All Trades.
3
Xiaxue also noted a uniform increase of 10 likes everyday on another episode as further evidence of Gushcloud buying views.
To note, these are not the official statistics from YouTube and is in no way provide substantial proof that Gushcloud bought fake likes, views and subsribers. Gushcloud’s co-founder and CEO, Mr Vincent Ha had also previously denied such claims.
Allegation 5: Irregular financial reports
Xiaxue ended by accusing Gushcloud for being financially unsound and almost running on deficits. She suggested that they are unable to pay their vendors and influencers, and backed it up with a “qualified opinion” for the 2012 financial reports and Gushcloud’s balance sheets.
Xiaxue ended her post by advising GushCloud influencers to withdraw their money, terminate their contract and publicly announce that they are no longer associated with them. She even offered legal advice to those who are in need of it by asking them to e-mail her.
Gushcloud responds
3
Four hours after Xiaxue’s post, Gushcloud announced that it is exploring legal options on Xiaxue’s post. In an Instagram post, it asserted that the article was inaccurate. It also said that it believed that the blogpost was calculated to disparage and injure its reputation. It also attempted to rally its supporters with the hashtag #FaithinGushCloud.
Gushcloud’s co-founder, Ms Althea Lim also penned a personal statement to Xiaxue, refuting the allegations to be “far from the truth”. She also questioned Xiaxue’s ulterior motives, reminding readers that she is a stakeholder and/or a shareholder in Nuffnang, Gushcloud’s rival.
Ms Lim also refuted the allegation of bought YouTube views, by posting two pictures of statistics from YouTube’s Google Analytics.

The number of Pageviews for the video
The number of Pageviews for the video
The geographical analysis of viewers
The geographical analysis of viewers
The peaks indicate spikes in video views. Ms Lim also noted the spikes on weekends. She also noted that the tell-tale sign of bought views, with hits from countries like Russia and Afghanistan that occur as a sudden spike on a single day for a specific video, did not happen with Babe of All Trades. Also, 87% of views for it’s videos come from Singapore and Malaysia.
Before ending her statement, she noted that Xiaxue says ‘standing up to bullies is the right thing to do.” Ms Lim went on to accuse Xiaxue of using ‘bullying antics,’ not only against Gushcloud in her latest post but against many. She also accused Xiaxue of being a liar and challenged Xiaxue to sue her if she believed that she was wrong to say so.
Gushcloud has also released an official statement, which we have covered in a separate article.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

LTA and e2i signs MoU to develop local rail industry workforce, rail industry looking to increase engineers by 50%

Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan said that rail companies are looking to…

职总富食客:官网小贩申请表格不适用旧机场路小贩

针对老顾客为旧机场路小贩打抱不平,职总富食客也打破沉默,向媒体澄清,小贩们签租约时,管理公司都有解释条款,合约中注意事项也是中英对照,确保小贩了解工作人员解释的内同才签约。 职总富食客告诉媒体,旧的清洁承包商合约在2017年下旬到期,而新承包商在2018年1月才开始服务。 依循小贩协会要求,管理层依据不同种类摊位的碗碟使用量,征收不同的餐桌清洁费: 糕点/点心档:374元 饮料/甜品档:513元 熟食档:588元 至于Gary Ho提到,小贩被要求为小贩中心公共空间投保,职总富食客则解释,这是环境局的要求,要小贩担负公共责任保险,为第三方在遇到火灾、食物中毒等意外下提供保障。不过,职总富食客也强调这个保险并不是强制性的,小贩也可接洽其他保险公司。 针对小贩营业时间,职总富食客表示,没有制定最低营业时间,也没有规定小贩每星期可休息几天。要暂时休业则只需通知管理层就可。 网络申请表格不适用旧机场路小贩 职总富食客也进一步解释,从该合作社官网下载的小贩申请表格,并不适用在旧机场路小贩中心。 该合作社表示,将和小贩协会紧密合作,确保租约内容透明,征聘的承包商也符合小贩们的实际需求。…

总理调高退休、重新雇佣年龄 淡马亚揶揄形同鼓励“工作致死”

今早,《联合早报》以《承前启后  克服天地局限》为题,报导总理李显龙的国庆群众大会演讲。总理阐述将在2021年起,逐步提高年长雇员公积金缴交率、未来100年气候暖化问题以及政府将确保学前教育费减低。 针对总理的国庆群众大会演说,新加坡民主党很快就录制视频回应,该党主席淡马亚揶揄调高退休和重新雇佣年龄,形同鼓励“工作致死”。 他说,国人原本期待总理能提出强而有力的建议,应对当前瞬息变幻社会和地缘政治的挑战,但不幸的是国人再次失望。 他表示,总理声称国人要工作到70岁, 但是根据新加坡移民关卡局2018年的统计,因主要死亡原因去世,华裔的死亡年龄中位数(median)为78.3巴仙、巫裔71巴仙以及印裔68.7巴仙。 淡马亚反问,总理也没有拿出理据,能够证明新加坡人难道真得并无意享受退休生活?没有探讨国人究竟愿不愿意花时间享受他们奋斗的果实、含饴弄孙、去做义工或者是有闲暇时间去旅行、玩玩麻将等等。 “反之,我们的总理和部长们坚持要我们一直工作到70岁。” 淡马亚说,曾经询问过前任人力部长,是否放心让一个已年届70岁的脑科医生做手术?还是乘搭由70岁老司机驾驶的公共巴士?但是该部长坚称,这些年长雇员可以接受在培训。 但是,淡马亚曾询问这些巴士司机和脑科医生,他们不认为自己到了那岁数还能再学习新事物,他们更希望能领取足以填补公积金的退休津贴。 教育方面,李显龙指政府目前在学前教育上每年10亿元的投资,下来几年将翻一倍。李总理指出,政府也将确保至少80%的学前教育学额由政府资助,与住房和医药一样给予高比率津贴。 不过,淡马亚指出,这反而让人想起新加坡人常说的自嘲谚语:“给你个鸡翅,拿走你整只鸡”。…

Site survey video: TOC visits Pasir Ris ONE

Members of parliament continue to call for the scrapping of the Design,…